Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › legal pot coming soon!
- This topic has 630 replies, 44 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by sdduuuude.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 25, 2009 at 4:41 PM #355516February 25, 2009 at 4:42 PM #354939LAAFTERHOURSParticipant
[quote=afx114][quote=jpinpb]Drug dealers won’t allow it to be legalized. That would cut into their money – not to mention the taxes they’d have to pay. Thinking the wrong way about cops. Drug dealers make way too much money to ever have this legalized. [/quote]
Drug dealer’s can’t do anything to prevent the legalization of pot. But big pharma, tobacco, and alcohol can. They are the biggest lobbyists against the legalization of pot because it will directly affect their bottom line.
[/quote]I would think pharmaceuticals would love to legalize bud and sell it
February 25, 2009 at 4:42 PM #355248LAAFTERHOURSParticipant[quote=afx114][quote=jpinpb]Drug dealers won’t allow it to be legalized. That would cut into their money – not to mention the taxes they’d have to pay. Thinking the wrong way about cops. Drug dealers make way too much money to ever have this legalized. [/quote]
Drug dealer’s can’t do anything to prevent the legalization of pot. But big pharma, tobacco, and alcohol can. They are the biggest lobbyists against the legalization of pot because it will directly affect their bottom line.
[/quote]I would think pharmaceuticals would love to legalize bud and sell it
February 25, 2009 at 4:42 PM #355383LAAFTERHOURSParticipant[quote=afx114][quote=jpinpb]Drug dealers won’t allow it to be legalized. That would cut into their money – not to mention the taxes they’d have to pay. Thinking the wrong way about cops. Drug dealers make way too much money to ever have this legalized. [/quote]
Drug dealer’s can’t do anything to prevent the legalization of pot. But big pharma, tobacco, and alcohol can. They are the biggest lobbyists against the legalization of pot because it will directly affect their bottom line.
[/quote]I would think pharmaceuticals would love to legalize bud and sell it
February 25, 2009 at 4:42 PM #355411LAAFTERHOURSParticipant[quote=afx114][quote=jpinpb]Drug dealers won’t allow it to be legalized. That would cut into their money – not to mention the taxes they’d have to pay. Thinking the wrong way about cops. Drug dealers make way too much money to ever have this legalized. [/quote]
Drug dealer’s can’t do anything to prevent the legalization of pot. But big pharma, tobacco, and alcohol can. They are the biggest lobbyists against the legalization of pot because it will directly affect their bottom line.
[/quote]I would think pharmaceuticals would love to legalize bud and sell it
February 25, 2009 at 4:42 PM #355521LAAFTERHOURSParticipant[quote=afx114][quote=jpinpb]Drug dealers won’t allow it to be legalized. That would cut into their money – not to mention the taxes they’d have to pay. Thinking the wrong way about cops. Drug dealers make way too much money to ever have this legalized. [/quote]
Drug dealer’s can’t do anything to prevent the legalization of pot. But big pharma, tobacco, and alcohol can. They are the biggest lobbyists against the legalization of pot because it will directly affect their bottom line.
[/quote]I would think pharmaceuticals would love to legalize bud and sell it
February 25, 2009 at 4:43 PM #354945ArrayaParticipantI don’t have a problem with legalizing pot logically or fiscally, but how do you now tell your kids pot is okay but cocaine, LSD, speed, meth, and X are not?
See that’s the problem, we drilled it into their head that it is a “gate way” drug or dangerous as those other drugs when in actuality it is less harmful than most. We should not have bullshitted them in the first place. How many people die from tobacco? What kinds of problems arise from alcohol?
The roots of the socially ingrained stigma started in the 30s. Dupont had patented nylon and worked together with the Feds and the pulp and paper inustry to bring down hemp farmers. So they came out with propaganda films and pamphlets. They actually had one where it depicted white girls smoking it which would lead to seeking the “relations” of black men. lol
I’d say that pharmaceutical companies would be threatened by legalization because they know it could take a substantial bite out of the anti-depressant market, which is enormous in the US, as well.
The free market is a mythical beast.
February 25, 2009 at 4:43 PM #355253ArrayaParticipantI don’t have a problem with legalizing pot logically or fiscally, but how do you now tell your kids pot is okay but cocaine, LSD, speed, meth, and X are not?
See that’s the problem, we drilled it into their head that it is a “gate way” drug or dangerous as those other drugs when in actuality it is less harmful than most. We should not have bullshitted them in the first place. How many people die from tobacco? What kinds of problems arise from alcohol?
The roots of the socially ingrained stigma started in the 30s. Dupont had patented nylon and worked together with the Feds and the pulp and paper inustry to bring down hemp farmers. So they came out with propaganda films and pamphlets. They actually had one where it depicted white girls smoking it which would lead to seeking the “relations” of black men. lol
I’d say that pharmaceutical companies would be threatened by legalization because they know it could take a substantial bite out of the anti-depressant market, which is enormous in the US, as well.
The free market is a mythical beast.
February 25, 2009 at 4:43 PM #355388ArrayaParticipantI don’t have a problem with legalizing pot logically or fiscally, but how do you now tell your kids pot is okay but cocaine, LSD, speed, meth, and X are not?
See that’s the problem, we drilled it into their head that it is a “gate way” drug or dangerous as those other drugs when in actuality it is less harmful than most. We should not have bullshitted them in the first place. How many people die from tobacco? What kinds of problems arise from alcohol?
The roots of the socially ingrained stigma started in the 30s. Dupont had patented nylon and worked together with the Feds and the pulp and paper inustry to bring down hemp farmers. So they came out with propaganda films and pamphlets. They actually had one where it depicted white girls smoking it which would lead to seeking the “relations” of black men. lol
I’d say that pharmaceutical companies would be threatened by legalization because they know it could take a substantial bite out of the anti-depressant market, which is enormous in the US, as well.
The free market is a mythical beast.
February 25, 2009 at 4:43 PM #355417ArrayaParticipantI don’t have a problem with legalizing pot logically or fiscally, but how do you now tell your kids pot is okay but cocaine, LSD, speed, meth, and X are not?
See that’s the problem, we drilled it into their head that it is a “gate way” drug or dangerous as those other drugs when in actuality it is less harmful than most. We should not have bullshitted them in the first place. How many people die from tobacco? What kinds of problems arise from alcohol?
The roots of the socially ingrained stigma started in the 30s. Dupont had patented nylon and worked together with the Feds and the pulp and paper inustry to bring down hemp farmers. So they came out with propaganda films and pamphlets. They actually had one where it depicted white girls smoking it which would lead to seeking the “relations” of black men. lol
I’d say that pharmaceutical companies would be threatened by legalization because they know it could take a substantial bite out of the anti-depressant market, which is enormous in the US, as well.
The free market is a mythical beast.
February 25, 2009 at 4:43 PM #355526ArrayaParticipantI don’t have a problem with legalizing pot logically or fiscally, but how do you now tell your kids pot is okay but cocaine, LSD, speed, meth, and X are not?
See that’s the problem, we drilled it into their head that it is a “gate way” drug or dangerous as those other drugs when in actuality it is less harmful than most. We should not have bullshitted them in the first place. How many people die from tobacco? What kinds of problems arise from alcohol?
The roots of the socially ingrained stigma started in the 30s. Dupont had patented nylon and worked together with the Feds and the pulp and paper inustry to bring down hemp farmers. So they came out with propaganda films and pamphlets. They actually had one where it depicted white girls smoking it which would lead to seeking the “relations” of black men. lol
I’d say that pharmaceutical companies would be threatened by legalization because they know it could take a substantial bite out of the anti-depressant market, which is enormous in the US, as well.
The free market is a mythical beast.
February 25, 2009 at 4:44 PM #354929nostradamusParticipant[quote=afx114]Drug dealer’s can’t do anything to prevent the legalization of pot. But big pharma, tobacco, and alcohol can. They are the biggest lobbyists against the legalization of pot because it will directly affect their bottom line.[/quote]
No way. Stoned people are gonna crave things. Beer, twinkies, ding-dongs, cheetos, munchies, all that junk. If pot is legalized I’d go long on frito-lay and hershey’s.I agree with JP, the dealers can’t want the government involved in their business. I would think top dealers can easily afford to buy the votes of these low-level assemblymen.
Lastly I’m sure the church will have it’s say in this.
February 25, 2009 at 4:44 PM #355239nostradamusParticipant[quote=afx114]Drug dealer’s can’t do anything to prevent the legalization of pot. But big pharma, tobacco, and alcohol can. They are the biggest lobbyists against the legalization of pot because it will directly affect their bottom line.[/quote]
No way. Stoned people are gonna crave things. Beer, twinkies, ding-dongs, cheetos, munchies, all that junk. If pot is legalized I’d go long on frito-lay and hershey’s.I agree with JP, the dealers can’t want the government involved in their business. I would think top dealers can easily afford to buy the votes of these low-level assemblymen.
Lastly I’m sure the church will have it’s say in this.
February 25, 2009 at 4:44 PM #355373nostradamusParticipant[quote=afx114]Drug dealer’s can’t do anything to prevent the legalization of pot. But big pharma, tobacco, and alcohol can. They are the biggest lobbyists against the legalization of pot because it will directly affect their bottom line.[/quote]
No way. Stoned people are gonna crave things. Beer, twinkies, ding-dongs, cheetos, munchies, all that junk. If pot is legalized I’d go long on frito-lay and hershey’s.I agree with JP, the dealers can’t want the government involved in their business. I would think top dealers can easily afford to buy the votes of these low-level assemblymen.
Lastly I’m sure the church will have it’s say in this.
February 25, 2009 at 4:44 PM #355401nostradamusParticipant[quote=afx114]Drug dealer’s can’t do anything to prevent the legalization of pot. But big pharma, tobacco, and alcohol can. They are the biggest lobbyists against the legalization of pot because it will directly affect their bottom line.[/quote]
No way. Stoned people are gonna crave things. Beer, twinkies, ding-dongs, cheetos, munchies, all that junk. If pot is legalized I’d go long on frito-lay and hershey’s.I agree with JP, the dealers can’t want the government involved in their business. I would think top dealers can easily afford to buy the votes of these low-level assemblymen.
Lastly I’m sure the church will have it’s say in this.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.