- This topic has 53 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 2 months ago by Bugs.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 14, 2007 at 10:36 PM #75514August 14, 2007 at 11:32 PM #75441NotCrankyParticipant
My posts were a bit snarcastic as well. I love Drunkle’s posts. I am glad I asked about your’s though I had it wrong.
As with housing prices I take a wait and see with the american “empire” fall. Of course there are problems but the respective courses and timelines I think nobody really knows.bsrsharma,
We have had plenty of socio-political & religious commentary post & they have proven not to go over very well. I think that’s why you got some pretty flippant responses(including mine) and that’s about it. Besides that, the last couple of weeks have been pretty interesting within the main themes of this blog.
Best wishes,August 14, 2007 at 11:32 PM #75562NotCrankyParticipantMy posts were a bit snarcastic as well. I love Drunkle’s posts. I am glad I asked about your’s though I had it wrong.
As with housing prices I take a wait and see with the american “empire” fall. Of course there are problems but the respective courses and timelines I think nobody really knows.bsrsharma,
We have had plenty of socio-political & religious commentary post & they have proven not to go over very well. I think that’s why you got some pretty flippant responses(including mine) and that’s about it. Besides that, the last couple of weeks have been pretty interesting within the main themes of this blog.
Best wishes,August 14, 2007 at 11:32 PM #75560NotCrankyParticipantMy posts were a bit snarcastic as well. I love Drunkle’s posts. I am glad I asked about your’s though I had it wrong.
As with housing prices I take a wait and see with the american “empire” fall. Of course there are problems but the respective courses and timelines I think nobody really knows.bsrsharma,
We have had plenty of socio-political & religious commentary post & they have proven not to go over very well. I think that’s why you got some pretty flippant responses(including mine) and that’s about it. Besides that, the last couple of weeks have been pretty interesting within the main themes of this blog.
Best wishes,August 15, 2007 at 12:58 AM #75462drunkleParticipantcheers rusty. i’ll send you a drunkle bob fan club tshirt as soon as i can find, make or buy another fan…
August 15, 2007 at 12:58 AM #75579drunkleParticipantcheers rusty. i’ll send you a drunkle bob fan club tshirt as soon as i can find, make or buy another fan…
August 15, 2007 at 12:58 AM #75584drunkleParticipantcheers rusty. i’ll send you a drunkle bob fan club tshirt as soon as i can find, make or buy another fan…
October 3, 2007 at 10:09 AM #86830bsrsharmaParticipantI hope these guys just want some publicity. I thought we had problems of British Empire not Soviets.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071003/ap_on_re_us/secessionist_movement
Secessionists meeting in Tennesse
By BILL POOVEY, Associated Press Writer
Wed Oct 3, 3:15 AM ETIn an unlikely marriage of desire to secede from the United States, two advocacy groups from opposite political traditions — New England and the South — are sitting down to talk.
Tired of foreign wars and what they consider right-wing courts, the Middlebury Institute wants liberal states like Vermont to be able to secede peacefully.
That sounds just fine to the League of the South, a conservative group that refuses to give up on Southern independence.
“We believe that an independent South, or Hawaii, Alaska, or Vermont would be better able to serve the interest of everybody, regardless of race or ethnicity,” said Michael Hill of Killen, Ala., president of the League of the South.
Separated by hundreds of miles and divergent political philosophies, the Middlebury Institute and the League of the South are hosting a two-day Secessionist Convention starting Wednesday in Chattanooga.
They expect to attract supporters from California, Alaska and Hawaii, inviting anyone who wants to dissolve the Union so states can save themselves from an overbearing federal government.
If allowed to go their own way, New Englanders “probably would allow abortion and have gun control,” Hill said, while Southerners “would probably crack down on illegal immigration harder than it is being now.”
The U.S. Constitution does not explicitly prohibit secession, but few people think it is politically viable.
Vermont, one of the nation’s most liberal states, has become a hotbed for liberal secessionists, a fringe movement that gained new traction because of the Iraq war, rising oil prices and the formation of several pro-secession groups.
Thomas Naylor, the founder of one of those groups, the Second Vermont Republic, said the friendly relationship with the League of the South doesn’t mean everyone shares all the same beliefs.
But Naylor, a retired Duke University professor, said the League of the South shares his group’s opposition to the federal government and the need to pursue secession.
“It doesn’t matter if our next president is Condoleeza (Rice) or Hillary (Clinton), it is going to be grim,” said Naylor, adding that there are secessionist movements in more than 25 states, including Hawaii, Alaska, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Texas.
The Middlebury Institute, based in Cold Spring, N.Y., was started in 2005. Its followers, disillusioned by the Iraq war and federal imperialism, share the idea of states becoming independent republics. They contend their movement is growing.
The first North American Separatist Convention was held last fall in Vermont, which, unlike most Southern states, supports civil unions. Voters there elected a socialist to the U.S. Senate.
Middlebury director Kirpatrick Sale said Hill offered to sponsor the second secessionist convention, but the co-sponsor arrangement was intended to show that “the folks up north regard you as legitimate colleagues.”
“It bothers me that people have wrongly declared them to be racists,” Sale said.
The League of the South says it is not racist, but proudly displays a Confederate Battle Flag on its banner.
Mark Potok, director of the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Intelligence Project, which monitors hate groups, said the League of the South “has been on our list close to a decade.”
“What is remarkable and really astounding about this situation is we see people and institutions who are supposedly on the progressive left rubbing shoulders with bona fide white supremacists,” Potok said.
Sale said the League of the South “has not done or said anything racist in its 14 years of existence,” and that the Southern Poverty Law Center is not credible.
“They call everybody racists,” Sale said. “There are, no doubt, racists in the League of the South, and there are, no doubt, racists everywhere.”
Harry Watson, director of the Center For the Study of the American South and a history professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, said it was a surprise to see The Middlebury Institute conferring with the League of the South, “an organization that’s associated with a cause that many of us associate with the preservation of slavery.”
He said the unlikely partnering “represents the far left and far right of American politics coming together.”
On the Net:
Middlebury Institute: http://middleburyinstitute.org/
League of the South: http://www.leagueofthesouth.net
Second Vermont Republic: http://www.vermontrepublic.org/
Southern Poverty Law Center: http://www.splcenter.org/index.jsp
Copyright © 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The information contained in the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.
October 3, 2007 at 10:26 AM #86831BugsParticipantI think Carlsbad, Encinitas, Solana Beach and Del Mar should suceed from San Diego County. That way we can have our own MLS and maintain our area as a safe haven from declining property values.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.