- This topic has 85 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 2 months ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 17, 2009 at 5:46 PM #446545August 17, 2009 at 5:56 PM #446370anParticipant
[quote=sdcellar]To put it in perspective:
SANDAG source 2000 2008 Change
[/quote]
Profile (1999 $) 94,508 99,604 +5.4%
Profile (current) 94,508 134,488 +42.3%
DW (1999 $) 94,509 95,312 +0.8%
The only logical explanation I can think of is, they use different inflation number. here’s 92126’s #:
(1999 $) $60,349 $61,252 1.5%
(current $) $60,349 $82,704 37.0%
DW (1999 $) $60,350 $62,466 3.5%August 17, 2009 at 5:56 PM #445768anParticipant[quote=sdcellar]To put it in perspective:
SANDAG source 2000 2008 Change
[/quote]
Profile (1999 $) 94,508 99,604 +5.4%
Profile (current) 94,508 134,488 +42.3%
DW (1999 $) 94,509 95,312 +0.8%
The only logical explanation I can think of is, they use different inflation number. here’s 92126’s #:
(1999 $) $60,349 $61,252 1.5%
(current $) $60,349 $82,704 37.0%
DW (1999 $) $60,350 $62,466 3.5%August 17, 2009 at 5:56 PM #445959anParticipant[quote=sdcellar]To put it in perspective:
SANDAG source 2000 2008 Change
[/quote]
Profile (1999 $) 94,508 99,604 +5.4%
Profile (current) 94,508 134,488 +42.3%
DW (1999 $) 94,509 95,312 +0.8%
The only logical explanation I can think of is, they use different inflation number. here’s 92126’s #:
(1999 $) $60,349 $61,252 1.5%
(current $) $60,349 $82,704 37.0%
DW (1999 $) $60,350 $62,466 3.5%August 17, 2009 at 5:56 PM #446299anParticipant[quote=sdcellar]To put it in perspective:
SANDAG source 2000 2008 Change
[/quote]
Profile (1999 $) 94,508 99,604 +5.4%
Profile (current) 94,508 134,488 +42.3%
DW (1999 $) 94,509 95,312 +0.8%
The only logical explanation I can think of is, they use different inflation number. here’s 92126’s #:
(1999 $) $60,349 $61,252 1.5%
(current $) $60,349 $82,704 37.0%
DW (1999 $) $60,350 $62,466 3.5%August 17, 2009 at 5:56 PM #446550anParticipant[quote=sdcellar]To put it in perspective:
SANDAG source 2000 2008 Change
[/quote]
Profile (1999 $) 94,508 99,604 +5.4%
Profile (current) 94,508 134,488 +42.3%
DW (1999 $) 94,509 95,312 +0.8%
The only logical explanation I can think of is, they use different inflation number. here’s 92126’s #:
(1999 $) $60,349 $61,252 1.5%
(current $) $60,349 $82,704 37.0%
DW (1999 $) $60,350 $62,466 3.5%August 17, 2009 at 6:03 PM #446375briansd1GuestRemember that all else is not equal.
Debt level and unemployment will play a big part in the unraveling.
Supply of housing will also play a major role.
I’m betting that well-paying professional jobs will exit San Diego. There will not be enough jobs to support all the McMansions that were built in the last 10 years.
August 17, 2009 at 6:03 PM #445773briansd1GuestRemember that all else is not equal.
Debt level and unemployment will play a big part in the unraveling.
Supply of housing will also play a major role.
I’m betting that well-paying professional jobs will exit San Diego. There will not be enough jobs to support all the McMansions that were built in the last 10 years.
August 17, 2009 at 6:03 PM #445964briansd1GuestRemember that all else is not equal.
Debt level and unemployment will play a big part in the unraveling.
Supply of housing will also play a major role.
I’m betting that well-paying professional jobs will exit San Diego. There will not be enough jobs to support all the McMansions that were built in the last 10 years.
August 17, 2009 at 6:03 PM #446304briansd1GuestRemember that all else is not equal.
Debt level and unemployment will play a big part in the unraveling.
Supply of housing will also play a major role.
I’m betting that well-paying professional jobs will exit San Diego. There will not be enough jobs to support all the McMansions that were built in the last 10 years.
August 17, 2009 at 6:03 PM #446555briansd1GuestRemember that all else is not equal.
Debt level and unemployment will play a big part in the unraveling.
Supply of housing will also play a major role.
I’m betting that well-paying professional jobs will exit San Diego. There will not be enough jobs to support all the McMansions that were built in the last 10 years.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.