Menu

Home › Forums › Housing › LA Times Article re spotting the bottom.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 86 total)
1 2 3 4 5 6
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 17, 2009 at 5:10 PM #445934
    Eugene
    Participant

    http://profilewarehouse.sandag.org

    August 17, 2009 at 5:32 PM #446284
    sdcellar
    Participant

    That’s weird. I was wondering the same thing, so I went looking myself, but ended up at datawarehouse.sandag.org instead. The interesting thing is that there, they don’t have the non-inflation adjusted 2008 income; just in 1999 dollars.

    The odd part is the data warehouse side has 92130 income at $95,312 while profile warehouse has it at $99,604. Quite a discrepancy, seeing as they both come from sandag…

    I’m now left to wonder what we’ve got here. I certainly was thinking that the signficant increase between 2000 and 2008 seemed high. I loved the theory until I started digging deeper.

    August 17, 2009 at 5:32 PM #446535
    sdcellar
    Participant

    That’s weird. I was wondering the same thing, so I went looking myself, but ended up at datawarehouse.sandag.org instead. The interesting thing is that there, they don’t have the non-inflation adjusted 2008 income; just in 1999 dollars.

    The odd part is the data warehouse side has 92130 income at $95,312 while profile warehouse has it at $99,604. Quite a discrepancy, seeing as they both come from sandag…

    I’m now left to wonder what we’ve got here. I certainly was thinking that the signficant increase between 2000 and 2008 seemed high. I loved the theory until I started digging deeper.

    August 17, 2009 at 5:32 PM #445753
    sdcellar
    Participant

    That’s weird. I was wondering the same thing, so I went looking myself, but ended up at datawarehouse.sandag.org instead. The interesting thing is that there, they don’t have the non-inflation adjusted 2008 income; just in 1999 dollars.

    The odd part is the data warehouse side has 92130 income at $95,312 while profile warehouse has it at $99,604. Quite a discrepancy, seeing as they both come from sandag…

    I’m now left to wonder what we’ve got here. I certainly was thinking that the signficant increase between 2000 and 2008 seemed high. I loved the theory until I started digging deeper.

    August 17, 2009 at 5:32 PM #446356
    sdcellar
    Participant

    That’s weird. I was wondering the same thing, so I went looking myself, but ended up at datawarehouse.sandag.org instead. The interesting thing is that there, they don’t have the non-inflation adjusted 2008 income; just in 1999 dollars.

    The odd part is the data warehouse side has 92130 income at $95,312 while profile warehouse has it at $99,604. Quite a discrepancy, seeing as they both come from sandag…

    I’m now left to wonder what we’ve got here. I certainly was thinking that the signficant increase between 2000 and 2008 seemed high. I loved the theory until I started digging deeper.

    August 17, 2009 at 5:32 PM #445944
    sdcellar
    Participant

    That’s weird. I was wondering the same thing, so I went looking myself, but ended up at datawarehouse.sandag.org instead. The interesting thing is that there, they don’t have the non-inflation adjusted 2008 income; just in 1999 dollars.

    The odd part is the data warehouse side has 92130 income at $95,312 while profile warehouse has it at $99,604. Quite a discrepancy, seeing as they both come from sandag…

    I’m now left to wonder what we’ve got here. I certainly was thinking that the signficant increase between 2000 and 2008 seemed high. I loved the theory until I started digging deeper.

    August 17, 2009 at 5:45 PM #446289
    sdcellar
    Participant

    To put it in perspective:

    SANDAG source 2000 2008 Change
    Profile (1999 $) 94,508 99,604 +5.4%
    Profile (current) 94,508 134,488 +42.3%
    DW (1999 $) 94,509 95,312 +0.8%

    August 17, 2009 at 5:45 PM #446540
    sdcellar
    Participant

    To put it in perspective:

    SANDAG source 2000 2008 Change
    Profile (1999 $) 94,508 99,604 +5.4%
    Profile (current) 94,508 134,488 +42.3%
    DW (1999 $) 94,509 95,312 +0.8%

    August 17, 2009 at 5:45 PM #445758
    sdcellar
    Participant

    To put it in perspective:

    SANDAG source 2000 2008 Change
    Profile (1999 $) 94,508 99,604 +5.4%
    Profile (current) 94,508 134,488 +42.3%
    DW (1999 $) 94,509 95,312 +0.8%

    August 17, 2009 at 5:45 PM #445949
    sdcellar
    Participant

    To put it in perspective:

    SANDAG source 2000 2008 Change
    Profile (1999 $) 94,508 99,604 +5.4%
    Profile (current) 94,508 134,488 +42.3%
    DW (1999 $) 94,509 95,312 +0.8%

    August 17, 2009 at 5:45 PM #446360
    sdcellar
    Participant

    To put it in perspective:

    SANDAG source 2000 2008 Change
    Profile (1999 $) 94,508 99,604 +5.4%
    Profile (current) 94,508 134,488 +42.3%
    DW (1999 $) 94,509 95,312 +0.8%

    August 17, 2009 at 5:46 PM #446365
    an
    Participant

    [quote=Eugene]http://profilewarehouse.sandag.org[/quote]
    Thanks Eugene.

    August 17, 2009 at 5:46 PM #445763
    an
    Participant

    [quote=Eugene]http://profilewarehouse.sandag.org[/quote]
    Thanks Eugene.

    August 17, 2009 at 5:46 PM #445954
    an
    Participant

    [quote=Eugene]http://profilewarehouse.sandag.org[/quote]
    Thanks Eugene.

    August 17, 2009 at 5:46 PM #446294
    an
    Participant

    [quote=Eugene]http://profilewarehouse.sandag.org[/quote]
    Thanks Eugene.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 86 total)
1 2 3 4 5 6
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.