- This topic has 20 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 11 months ago by
jameswenn.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 26, 2009 at 6:57 PM #16402September 26, 2009 at 9:55 PM #461444
cantab
ParticipantThe article says 2.125 million for 2200 sqft in La Jolla, compared to 1.49 million in Palo Alto.
Like for like, Palo Alto is in fact more expensive than La Jolla. This is even true if you compare a view house in LJ with a non-view house in PA.
There is a lot of choice in LJ of houses with 2500 sqft under 1.5 million.
September 26, 2009 at 9:55 PM #462259ParticipantThe article says 2.125 million for 2200 sqft in La Jolla, compared to 1.49 million in Palo Alto.
Like for like, Palo Alto is in fact more expensive than La Jolla. This is even true if you compare a view house in LJ with a non-view house in PA.
There is a lot of choice in LJ of houses with 2500 sqft under 1.5 million.
September 26, 2009 at 9:55 PM #462055ParticipantThe article says 2.125 million for 2200 sqft in La Jolla, compared to 1.49 million in Palo Alto.
Like for like, Palo Alto is in fact more expensive than La Jolla. This is even true if you compare a view house in LJ with a non-view house in PA.
There is a lot of choice in LJ of houses with 2500 sqft under 1.5 million.
September 26, 2009 at 9:55 PM #461982ParticipantThe article says 2.125 million for 2200 sqft in La Jolla, compared to 1.49 million in Palo Alto.
Like for like, Palo Alto is in fact more expensive than La Jolla. This is even true if you compare a view house in LJ with a non-view house in PA.
There is a lot of choice in LJ of houses with 2500 sqft under 1.5 million.
September 26, 2009 at 9:55 PM #461639ParticipantThe article says 2.125 million for 2200 sqft in La Jolla, compared to 1.49 million in Palo Alto.
Like for like, Palo Alto is in fact more expensive than La Jolla. This is even true if you compare a view house in LJ with a non-view house in PA.
There is a lot of choice in LJ of houses with 2500 sqft under 1.5 million.
September 28, 2009 at 7:35 AM #461848sdduuuude
ParticipantCan’t get “like for like”.
Tough to find a home 2 blocks from the beach in Palo Alto.September 28, 2009 at 7:35 AM #461653ParticipantCan’t get “like for like”.
Tough to find a home 2 blocks from the beach in Palo Alto.September 28, 2009 at 7:35 AM #462191ParticipantCan’t get “like for like”.
Tough to find a home 2 blocks from the beach in Palo Alto.September 28, 2009 at 7:35 AM #462265ParticipantCan’t get “like for like”.
Tough to find a home 2 blocks from the beach in Palo Alto.September 28, 2009 at 7:35 AM #462470ParticipantCan’t get “like for like”.
Tough to find a home 2 blocks from the beach in Palo Alto.September 28, 2009 at 8:33 AM #461868pencilneck
ParticipantFirstly, its an interesting survey. It gives you a comparitive look at slightly above average homes in 300 markets by looking at “the prices charged for 2,200-square-foot, four-bedroom, two-and-one-half bath, single-family homes.”
Unfortunately, Coldwell Bankers took an interesting survey and sort of twisted it to made a good headline for their press release. And, of course, it worked. The press release was republished completey uncritically in a variety of places as so called news.
But La Jolla is not the most expensive neighborhood based on criteria that most people would use. The Coldwell Banker survey only demonstrated that La Jolla is the most expensive market for slightly above average houses. Which is interesting, but not much to get excited about. (newsflash- La Jolla and Beverly Hills are desireable locations! Read all about it!)
September 28, 2009 at 8:33 AM #461673ParticipantFirstly, its an interesting survey. It gives you a comparitive look at slightly above average homes in 300 markets by looking at “the prices charged for 2,200-square-foot, four-bedroom, two-and-one-half bath, single-family homes.”
Unfortunately, Coldwell Bankers took an interesting survey and sort of twisted it to made a good headline for their press release. And, of course, it worked. The press release was republished completey uncritically in a variety of places as so called news.
But La Jolla is not the most expensive neighborhood based on criteria that most people would use. The Coldwell Banker survey only demonstrated that La Jolla is the most expensive market for slightly above average houses. Which is interesting, but not much to get excited about. (newsflash- La Jolla and Beverly Hills are desireable locations! Read all about it!)
September 28, 2009 at 8:33 AM #462211ParticipantFirstly, its an interesting survey. It gives you a comparitive look at slightly above average homes in 300 markets by looking at “the prices charged for 2,200-square-foot, four-bedroom, two-and-one-half bath, single-family homes.”
Unfortunately, Coldwell Bankers took an interesting survey and sort of twisted it to made a good headline for their press release. And, of course, it worked. The press release was republished completey uncritically in a variety of places as so called news.
But La Jolla is not the most expensive neighborhood based on criteria that most people would use. The Coldwell Banker survey only demonstrated that La Jolla is the most expensive market for slightly above average houses. Which is interesting, but not much to get excited about. (newsflash- La Jolla and Beverly Hills are desireable locations! Read all about it!)
September 28, 2009 at 8:33 AM #462285ParticipantFirstly, its an interesting survey. It gives you a comparitive look at slightly above average homes in 300 markets by looking at “the prices charged for 2,200-square-foot, four-bedroom, two-and-one-half bath, single-family homes.”
Unfortunately, Coldwell Bankers took an interesting survey and sort of twisted it to made a good headline for their press release. And, of course, it worked. The press release was republished completey uncritically in a variety of places as so called news.
But La Jolla is not the most expensive neighborhood based on criteria that most people would use. The Coldwell Banker survey only demonstrated that La Jolla is the most expensive market for slightly above average houses. Which is interesting, but not much to get excited about. (newsflash- La Jolla and Beverly Hills are desireable locations! Read all about it!)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.