KPMG vs NEW CENTURY Subprime “CFO blew the whistle”

[Navydoc]

I read most posts too (although I must admit, I don’t have the strength to get through the gay marriage thread), but like atr, my financial knowledge isn’t nearly developed enough to comment on this.

It’s funny, few have more years of education and training as I have (4yrs college, 4 yrs med school, 4 yrs residency, 3 yrs fellowship), and you know what? I have yet to take a basic economics course. I went to respected universities, BS from Penn State, MD from Pitt, and this was not required. They made me take speech and writing classes, but no econ. Most doctors get their econ education from the school of hard knocks, and I am certainly no exception, but I think this situation is far from ideal.

[Raybyrnes]

Navydoc

Here’s an econ class for you. Spend less than you earn. From your threads you could already have an MBA and PHD in this concept.

Lot of theory to boil down to a very simple concept.

[Raybyrnes]

Navydoc

Here’s an econ class for you. Spend less than you earn. From your threads you could already have an MBA and PHD in this concept.

Lot of theory to boil down to a very simple concept.

[Raybyrnes]

Navydoc

Here’s an econ class for you. Spend less than you earn. From your threads you could already have an MBA and PHD in this concept.

Lot of theory to boil down to a very simple concept.

[Raybyrnes]

Navydoc

Here’s an econ class for you. Spend less than you earn. From your threads you could already have an MBA and PHD in this concept.

Lot of theory to boil down to a very simple concept.

[Raybyrnes]

Navydoc

Here’s an econ class for you. Spend less than you earn. From your threads you could already have an MBA and PHD in this concept.

Lot of theory to boil down to a very simple concept.

[sdduuuude]

I’m thrilled that a post like this doesn’t 1100 people posting. That means it didn’t get hijacked.

And it means a bunch of people who don’t know what they are talking about didn’t try to respond.

And there really isn’t all that much to say – you didn’t ask a question or opinion or prompt people to reply in any way. Unlike “anyone know a good chinese buffet” which is just begging for as many people to respond as possible

Sometimes subtle is just as good as popular.

[sdduuuude]

I’m thrilled that a post like this doesn’t 1100 people posting. That means it didn’t get hijacked.

And it means a bunch of people who don’t know what they are talking about didn’t try to respond.

And there really isn’t all that much to say – you didn’t ask a question or opinion or prompt people to reply in any way. Unlike “anyone know a good chinese buffet” which is just begging for as many people to respond as possible

Sometimes subtle is just as good as popular.

[sdduuuude]

I’m thrilled that a post like this doesn’t 1100 people posting. That means it didn’t get hijacked.

And it means a bunch of people who don’t know what they are talking about didn’t try to respond.

And there really isn’t all that much to say – you didn’t ask a question or opinion or prompt people to reply in any way. Unlike “anyone know a good chinese buffet” which is just begging for as many people to respond as possible

Sometimes subtle is just as good as popular.

[sdduuuude]

I’m thrilled that a post like this doesn’t 1100 people posting. That means it didn’t get hijacked.

And it means a bunch of people who don’t know what they are talking about didn’t try to respond.

And there really isn’t all that much to say – you didn’t ask a question or opinion or prompt people to reply in any way. Unlike “anyone know a good chinese buffet” which is just begging for as many people to respond as possible

Sometimes subtle is just as good as popular.

[sdduuuude]

I’m thrilled that a post like this doesn’t 1100 people posting. That means it didn’t get hijacked.

And it means a bunch of people who don’t know what they are talking about didn’t try to respond.

And there really isn’t all that much to say – you didn’t ask a question or opinion or prompt people to reply in any way. Unlike “anyone know a good chinese buffet” which is just begging for as many people to respond as possible

Sometimes subtle is just as good as popular.

[HLS]

duuuude. CHILL.

You misunderstood the reply, which was to the comment made previously by JWM, which was spot on. (i.e. A FACT)

There was no mention of 1100 POSTS and the thread being hijacked, the FACT was that over 1100 people HAD READ the buffet thread, and only 11% of that number had read this thread. (HITS)

AGAIN, nothing to do with how many posts. HITS/Readers and POSTERS are 2 different things.

The fact remains that 9 times the number of people were interested in reading the buffet thread than this one, based on the forum topic headline.

As of the time I posted, those simply were the facts.
I can handle it.

Twist the facts however you want.
If subtle=128 and popular=1128, then in this case, subtle is NOT just as good as popular.

To put it another way, there was no comparison of the number of posts here VS the number of posts on the other thread.

That being said, and rereading your post, your comment doesn’t make any sense, at least not to me.

If the govt gets a hold of my facts, they will somehow turn it into a report that states that this post is more popular than the other one*
(*Based on seasonally adjusted numbers)

[HLS]

duuuude. CHILL.

You misunderstood the reply, which was to the comment made previously by JWM, which was spot on. (i.e. A FACT)

There was no mention of 1100 POSTS and the thread being hijacked, the FACT was that over 1100 people HAD READ the buffet thread, and only 11% of that number had read this thread. (HITS)

AGAIN, nothing to do with how many posts. HITS/Readers and POSTERS are 2 different things.

The fact remains that 9 times the number of people were interested in reading the buffet thread than this one, based on the forum topic headline.

As of the time I posted, those simply were the facts.
I can handle it.

Twist the facts however you want.
If subtle=128 and popular=1128, then in this case, subtle is NOT just as good as popular.

To put it another way, there was no comparison of the number of posts here VS the number of posts on the other thread.

That being said, and rereading your post, your comment doesn’t make any sense, at least not to me.

If the govt gets a hold of my facts, they will somehow turn it into a report that states that this post is more popular than the other one*
(*Based on seasonally adjusted numbers)

[HLS]

duuuude. CHILL.

You misunderstood the reply, which was to the comment made previously by JWM, which was spot on. (i.e. A FACT)

There was no mention of 1100 POSTS and the thread being hijacked, the FACT was that over 1100 people HAD READ the buffet thread, and only 11% of that number had read this thread. (HITS)

AGAIN, nothing to do with how many posts. HITS/Readers and POSTERS are 2 different things.

The fact remains that 9 times the number of people were interested in reading the buffet thread than this one, based on the forum topic headline.

As of the time I posted, those simply were the facts.
I can handle it.

Twist the facts however you want.
If subtle=128 and popular=1128, then in this case, subtle is NOT just as good as popular.

To put it another way, there was no comparison of the number of posts here VS the number of posts on the other thread.

That being said, and rereading your post, your comment doesn’t make any sense, at least not to me.

If the govt gets a hold of my facts, they will somehow turn it into a report that states that this post is more popular than the other one*
(*Based on seasonally adjusted numbers)

[HLS]

duuuude. CHILL.

You misunderstood the reply, which was to the comment made previously by JWM, which was spot on. (i.e. A FACT)

There was no mention of 1100 POSTS and the thread being hijacked, the FACT was that over 1100 people HAD READ the buffet thread, and only 11% of that number had read this thread. (HITS)

AGAIN, nothing to do with how many posts. HITS/Readers and POSTERS are 2 different things.

The fact remains that 9 times the number of people were interested in reading the buffet thread than this one, based on the forum topic headline.

As of the time I posted, those simply were the facts.
I can handle it.

Twist the facts however you want.
If subtle=128 and popular=1128, then in this case, subtle is NOT just as good as popular.

To put it another way, there was no comparison of the number of posts here VS the number of posts on the other thread.

That being said, and rereading your post, your comment doesn’t make any sense, at least not to me.

If the govt gets a hold of my facts, they will somehow turn it into a report that states that this post is more popular than the other one*
(*Based on seasonally adjusted numbers)

[Author]

Posts