Jim Cramer gets Pounded by John Stewart on the Daily Show

[gromit]

[quote=AN][quote=gromit]ROFL!!! You’re kidding, right??!! This website is the LAST place I’d expect to see that argument!!
[/quote]
You’re kidding right? Are you suggesting Piggington is a MSM now?[/quote]

No I think you misunderstood me AN (and I didn’t make my point clear)– just the opposite– I was pointing out that folks on this site were insightful and prescient in predicting the current crisis. I mean this site was all about predicting the mortgage/ financial crisis. I couldn’t believe that danthedart seemed to be arguing, in this forum of all places, that the crisis was unpredictable.

[CAwireman]

I’m watching the show and the previous clips that Stewart aired to bring it the Thursday interview.

Incredible stuff!

[CAwireman]

I’m watching the show and the previous clips that Stewart aired to bring it the Thursday interview.

Incredible stuff!

[CAwireman]

I’m watching the show and the previous clips that Stewart aired to bring it the Thursday interview.

Incredible stuff!

[CAwireman]

I’m watching the show and the previous clips that Stewart aired to bring it the Thursday interview.

Incredible stuff!

[CAwireman]

I’m watching the show and the previous clips that Stewart aired to bring it the Thursday interview.

Incredible stuff!

[davelj]

[quote=danthedart]
They’re BOTH snake oil salesman and NO Stewart doesn’t come clean with that, not on last nights episode anyway.

[/quote]

I don’t know which interview you watched. But take a look at Part 2 starting at 0:57.

http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2009/03/in-case-you-havent-yet-watched-jon.html

Jon Stewart: “Look, we’re both snake oil salesmen to an extent. But we [the Daily Show] do label it as snake oil here…”

That’s pretty clear. And pretty clean. Again, I’m not sure what show you watched.

[davelj]

[quote=danthedart]
They’re BOTH snake oil salesman and NO Stewart doesn’t come clean with that, not on last nights episode anyway.

[/quote]

I don’t know which interview you watched. But take a look at Part 2 starting at 0:57.

http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2009/03/in-case-you-havent-yet-watched-jon.html

Jon Stewart: “Look, we’re both snake oil salesmen to an extent. But we [the Daily Show] do label it as snake oil here…”

That’s pretty clear. And pretty clean. Again, I’m not sure what show you watched.

[davelj]

[quote=danthedart]
They’re BOTH snake oil salesman and NO Stewart doesn’t come clean with that, not on last nights episode anyway.

[/quote]

I don’t know which interview you watched. But take a look at Part 2 starting at 0:57.

http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2009/03/in-case-you-havent-yet-watched-jon.html

Jon Stewart: “Look, we’re both snake oil salesmen to an extent. But we [the Daily Show] do label it as snake oil here…”

That’s pretty clear. And pretty clean. Again, I’m not sure what show you watched.

[davelj]

[quote=danthedart]
They’re BOTH snake oil salesman and NO Stewart doesn’t come clean with that, not on last nights episode anyway.

[/quote]

I don’t know which interview you watched. But take a look at Part 2 starting at 0:57.

http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2009/03/in-case-you-havent-yet-watched-jon.html

Jon Stewart: “Look, we’re both snake oil salesmen to an extent. But we [the Daily Show] do label it as snake oil here…”

That’s pretty clear. And pretty clean. Again, I’m not sure what show you watched.

[davelj]

[quote=danthedart]
They’re BOTH snake oil salesman and NO Stewart doesn’t come clean with that, not on last nights episode anyway.

[/quote]

I don’t know which interview you watched. But take a look at Part 2 starting at 0:57.

http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2009/03/in-case-you-havent-yet-watched-jon.html

Jon Stewart: “Look, we’re both snake oil salesmen to an extent. But we [the Daily Show] do label it as snake oil here…”

That’s pretty clear. And pretty clean. Again, I’m not sure what show you watched.

[danthedart]

[quote=ltokuda][quote=danthedart]Nope not intentionally misrepresenting his views. Don’t be stupid. Use some analysis. Actually listen to what Cramer is saying and actually listen to what Stewart is saying. Stewart does not make a critical argument. Don’t worship the guy just because he’s funny. He’s playing to the audience’s desire for a lynching. He scapegoats Cramer for ratings.

You think I’m going to take a lynching seriously?

Just look how Stewart is destroying the level of intellectual conversation in this country. [/quote]

Others have already exlpained what Stewart’s main premise was and why it has merit. However, since you’re determined to intentionally miss Stewart’s main premise, the debate is pointless.[/quote]

Yup the debate is pointless if you’re not willing to do analysis. I’ve already explained time and time again why Stewart’s “premise” and his anger is completely misplaced. You seem to share his anger and are not willing to critically self examine the situation. If that’s the case. Yes it is pointless. You want to lynch someone and no amount of reasoning is going to convince you otherwise.

[danthedart]

[quote=ltokuda][quote=danthedart]Nope not intentionally misrepresenting his views. Don’t be stupid. Use some analysis. Actually listen to what Cramer is saying and actually listen to what Stewart is saying. Stewart does not make a critical argument. Don’t worship the guy just because he’s funny. He’s playing to the audience’s desire for a lynching. He scapegoats Cramer for ratings.

You think I’m going to take a lynching seriously?

Just look how Stewart is destroying the level of intellectual conversation in this country. [/quote]

Others have already exlpained what Stewart’s main premise was and why it has merit. However, since you’re determined to intentionally miss Stewart’s main premise, the debate is pointless.[/quote]

Yup the debate is pointless if you’re not willing to do analysis. I’ve already explained time and time again why Stewart’s “premise” and his anger is completely misplaced. You seem to share his anger and are not willing to critically self examine the situation. If that’s the case. Yes it is pointless. You want to lynch someone and no amount of reasoning is going to convince you otherwise.

[danthedart]

[quote=ltokuda][quote=danthedart]Nope not intentionally misrepresenting his views. Don’t be stupid. Use some analysis. Actually listen to what Cramer is saying and actually listen to what Stewart is saying. Stewart does not make a critical argument. Don’t worship the guy just because he’s funny. He’s playing to the audience’s desire for a lynching. He scapegoats Cramer for ratings.

You think I’m going to take a lynching seriously?

Just look how Stewart is destroying the level of intellectual conversation in this country. [/quote]

Others have already exlpained what Stewart’s main premise was and why it has merit. However, since you’re determined to intentionally miss Stewart’s main premise, the debate is pointless.[/quote]

Yup the debate is pointless if you’re not willing to do analysis. I’ve already explained time and time again why Stewart’s “premise” and his anger is completely misplaced. You seem to share his anger and are not willing to critically self examine the situation. If that’s the case. Yes it is pointless. You want to lynch someone and no amount of reasoning is going to convince you otherwise.

[danthedart]

[quote=ltokuda][quote=danthedart]Nope not intentionally misrepresenting his views. Don’t be stupid. Use some analysis. Actually listen to what Cramer is saying and actually listen to what Stewart is saying. Stewart does not make a critical argument. Don’t worship the guy just because he’s funny. He’s playing to the audience’s desire for a lynching. He scapegoats Cramer for ratings.

You think I’m going to take a lynching seriously?

Just look how Stewart is destroying the level of intellectual conversation in this country. [/quote]

Others have already exlpained what Stewart’s main premise was and why it has merit. However, since you’re determined to intentionally miss Stewart’s main premise, the debate is pointless.[/quote]

Yup the debate is pointless if you’re not willing to do analysis. I’ve already explained time and time again why Stewart’s “premise” and his anger is completely misplaced. You seem to share his anger and are not willing to critically self examine the situation. If that’s the case. Yes it is pointless. You want to lynch someone and no amount of reasoning is going to convince you otherwise.

[Author]

Posts