Jim Cramer gets Pounded by John Stewart on the Daily Show

[Enorah]

[quote=patientrenter][quote=danthedart]…..All he knows is that Cramer was wrong…and Stewart is quick enough and witty enough and funny enough to blast Cramer into the ground. [/quote]

God, that must have been fun to watch.
[/quote]

It really was not that fun to watch. Stewart seemed to get really pissed at one point. It was not comedy. It was investigative journalism. That was Stewart’s point. If you are going to call yourself a news network, then you ought to do some investigating on your own as opposed to taking the CEO’s word as truth. I also think it is total bs that “none of them knew” (meaning CNBC reporters) this was going to happen or could happen. Enough of us here knew this could happen and that it probably would happen for years now.

[SD Transplant]

Dan,

I was hoping you were just joking during your first comments, but I see you’re defending Cramer all the way. I don’t watch Cramer’s show much, but I’ve seen it a few times. Come on…..Cramer is a tool, and he got called/caught in a funny skeet because his big mouth coudn’t take a comediant’s criticism. He could bearly keep a straight face when Stewart provided great evidence during the 2006 shady advise on hedge funds (manipulate the sheeple). He’s just a puppet for the many CEOs he has been interviewing..

Whom do you preffer? Steward being funny (maybe annoying to some) or Kramer the finacial advisor/trader and screwing people with his idiotic advice?

[SD Transplant]

Dan,

I was hoping you were just joking during your first comments, but I see you’re defending Cramer all the way. I don’t watch Cramer’s show much, but I’ve seen it a few times. Come on…..Cramer is a tool, and he got called/caught in a funny skeet because his big mouth coudn’t take a comediant’s criticism. He could bearly keep a straight face when Stewart provided great evidence during the 2006 shady advise on hedge funds (manipulate the sheeple). He’s just a puppet for the many CEOs he has been interviewing..

Whom do you preffer? Steward being funny (maybe annoying to some) or Kramer the finacial advisor/trader and screwing people with his idiotic advice?

[SD Transplant]

Dan,

I was hoping you were just joking during your first comments, but I see you’re defending Cramer all the way. I don’t watch Cramer’s show much, but I’ve seen it a few times. Come on…..Cramer is a tool, and he got called/caught in a funny skeet because his big mouth coudn’t take a comediant’s criticism. He could bearly keep a straight face when Stewart provided great evidence during the 2006 shady advise on hedge funds (manipulate the sheeple). He’s just a puppet for the many CEOs he has been interviewing..

Whom do you preffer? Steward being funny (maybe annoying to some) or Kramer the finacial advisor/trader and screwing people with his idiotic advice?

[SD Transplant]

Dan,

I was hoping you were just joking during your first comments, but I see you’re defending Cramer all the way. I don’t watch Cramer’s show much, but I’ve seen it a few times. Come on…..Cramer is a tool, and he got called/caught in a funny skeet because his big mouth coudn’t take a comediant’s criticism. He could bearly keep a straight face when Stewart provided great evidence during the 2006 shady advise on hedge funds (manipulate the sheeple). He’s just a puppet for the many CEOs he has been interviewing..

Whom do you preffer? Steward being funny (maybe annoying to some) or Kramer the finacial advisor/trader and screwing people with his idiotic advice?

[SD Transplant]

Dan,

I was hoping you were just joking during your first comments, but I see you’re defending Cramer all the way. I don’t watch Cramer’s show much, but I’ve seen it a few times. Come on…..Cramer is a tool, and he got called/caught in a funny skeet because his big mouth coudn’t take a comediant’s criticism. He could bearly keep a straight face when Stewart provided great evidence during the 2006 shady advise on hedge funds (manipulate the sheeple). He’s just a puppet for the many CEOs he has been interviewing..

Whom do you preffer? Steward being funny (maybe annoying to some) or Kramer the finacial advisor/trader and screwing people with his idiotic advice?

[danthedart]

[quote=SD Transplant]Dan,

I was hoping you were just joking during your first comments, but I see you’re defending Cramer all the way. I don’t watch Cramer’s show much, but I’ve seen it a few times. Come on…..Cramer is a tool, and he got called/caught in a funny skeet because his big mouth coudn’t take a comediant’s criticism. He could bearly keep a straight face when Stewart provided great evidence during the 2006 shady advise on hedge funds (manipulate the sheeple). He’s just a puppet for the many CEOs he has been interviewing..

Whom do you preffer? Steward being funny (maybe annoying to some) or Kramer the finacial advisor/trader and screwing people with his idiotic advice?[/quote]

Cramer was wrong. I’m not defending him about that. He runs an entertainment TV show. Stewart? He does the same. They both run snake oil operations right? But Cramer is the one pretending to be serious and Stewart is the one who admits he’s not serious? That’s what I have a problem with.

NOW Cramer is the one who is admitting he’s an entertainer and NOW Stewart is the one trying to make a serious critique and do “investigative journalism” some peoples words. ITS NOT. That’s what I have a problem with. Don’t eat up everything Stewart is saying just because he’s a funny guy.

He’s not making a serious critique. Nothing he has said gets to the root of ANY problem. He has VERY little understanding of the economy and how we got here. The easiest thing for him to do is blame CNBC because they are visible. It’s a BLAME GAME. We love to see a lynching.

The rest of us cheer him on because we want someone to blame. I don’t care for Cramer. I don’t like his predictions and how many times he called a housing bottom… but Stewart is doing the ABSOLUTE same thing. The difference?

Stewart is a hero in your eyes and Cramer is a villian.

They’re BOTH snake oil salesman and NO Stewart doesn’t come clean with that, not on last nights episode anyway. He pretends that or thinks that he’s making a serious critique when he has 0 substance.

[danthedart]

[quote=SD Transplant]Dan,

I was hoping you were just joking during your first comments, but I see you’re defending Cramer all the way. I don’t watch Cramer’s show much, but I’ve seen it a few times. Come on…..Cramer is a tool, and he got called/caught in a funny skeet because his big mouth coudn’t take a comediant’s criticism. He could bearly keep a straight face when Stewart provided great evidence during the 2006 shady advise on hedge funds (manipulate the sheeple). He’s just a puppet for the many CEOs he has been interviewing..

Whom do you preffer? Steward being funny (maybe annoying to some) or Kramer the finacial advisor/trader and screwing people with his idiotic advice?[/quote]

Cramer was wrong. I’m not defending him about that. He runs an entertainment TV show. Stewart? He does the same. They both run snake oil operations right? But Cramer is the one pretending to be serious and Stewart is the one who admits he’s not serious? That’s what I have a problem with.

NOW Cramer is the one who is admitting he’s an entertainer and NOW Stewart is the one trying to make a serious critique and do “investigative journalism” some peoples words. ITS NOT. That’s what I have a problem with. Don’t eat up everything Stewart is saying just because he’s a funny guy.

He’s not making a serious critique. Nothing he has said gets to the root of ANY problem. He has VERY little understanding of the economy and how we got here. The easiest thing for him to do is blame CNBC because they are visible. It’s a BLAME GAME. We love to see a lynching.

The rest of us cheer him on because we want someone to blame. I don’t care for Cramer. I don’t like his predictions and how many times he called a housing bottom… but Stewart is doing the ABSOLUTE same thing. The difference?

Stewart is a hero in your eyes and Cramer is a villian.

They’re BOTH snake oil salesman and NO Stewart doesn’t come clean with that, not on last nights episode anyway. He pretends that or thinks that he’s making a serious critique when he has 0 substance.

[danthedart]

[quote=SD Transplant]Dan,

I was hoping you were just joking during your first comments, but I see you’re defending Cramer all the way. I don’t watch Cramer’s show much, but I’ve seen it a few times. Come on…..Cramer is a tool, and he got called/caught in a funny skeet because his big mouth coudn’t take a comediant’s criticism. He could bearly keep a straight face when Stewart provided great evidence during the 2006 shady advise on hedge funds (manipulate the sheeple). He’s just a puppet for the many CEOs he has been interviewing..

Whom do you preffer? Steward being funny (maybe annoying to some) or Kramer the finacial advisor/trader and screwing people with his idiotic advice?[/quote]

Cramer was wrong. I’m not defending him about that. He runs an entertainment TV show. Stewart? He does the same. They both run snake oil operations right? But Cramer is the one pretending to be serious and Stewart is the one who admits he’s not serious? That’s what I have a problem with.

NOW Cramer is the one who is admitting he’s an entertainer and NOW Stewart is the one trying to make a serious critique and do “investigative journalism” some peoples words. ITS NOT. That’s what I have a problem with. Don’t eat up everything Stewart is saying just because he’s a funny guy.

He’s not making a serious critique. Nothing he has said gets to the root of ANY problem. He has VERY little understanding of the economy and how we got here. The easiest thing for him to do is blame CNBC because they are visible. It’s a BLAME GAME. We love to see a lynching.

The rest of us cheer him on because we want someone to blame. I don’t care for Cramer. I don’t like his predictions and how many times he called a housing bottom… but Stewart is doing the ABSOLUTE same thing. The difference?

Stewart is a hero in your eyes and Cramer is a villian.

They’re BOTH snake oil salesman and NO Stewart doesn’t come clean with that, not on last nights episode anyway. He pretends that or thinks that he’s making a serious critique when he has 0 substance.

[danthedart]

[quote=SD Transplant]Dan,

I was hoping you were just joking during your first comments, but I see you’re defending Cramer all the way. I don’t watch Cramer’s show much, but I’ve seen it a few times. Come on…..Cramer is a tool, and he got called/caught in a funny skeet because his big mouth coudn’t take a comediant’s criticism. He could bearly keep a straight face when Stewart provided great evidence during the 2006 shady advise on hedge funds (manipulate the sheeple). He’s just a puppet for the many CEOs he has been interviewing..

Whom do you preffer? Steward being funny (maybe annoying to some) or Kramer the finacial advisor/trader and screwing people with his idiotic advice?[/quote]

Cramer was wrong. I’m not defending him about that. He runs an entertainment TV show. Stewart? He does the same. They both run snake oil operations right? But Cramer is the one pretending to be serious and Stewart is the one who admits he’s not serious? That’s what I have a problem with.

NOW Cramer is the one who is admitting he’s an entertainer and NOW Stewart is the one trying to make a serious critique and do “investigative journalism” some peoples words. ITS NOT. That’s what I have a problem with. Don’t eat up everything Stewart is saying just because he’s a funny guy.

He’s not making a serious critique. Nothing he has said gets to the root of ANY problem. He has VERY little understanding of the economy and how we got here. The easiest thing for him to do is blame CNBC because they are visible. It’s a BLAME GAME. We love to see a lynching.

The rest of us cheer him on because we want someone to blame. I don’t care for Cramer. I don’t like his predictions and how many times he called a housing bottom… but Stewart is doing the ABSOLUTE same thing. The difference?

Stewart is a hero in your eyes and Cramer is a villian.

They’re BOTH snake oil salesman and NO Stewart doesn’t come clean with that, not on last nights episode anyway. He pretends that or thinks that he’s making a serious critique when he has 0 substance.

[danthedart]

[quote=SD Transplant]Dan,

I was hoping you were just joking during your first comments, but I see you’re defending Cramer all the way. I don’t watch Cramer’s show much, but I’ve seen it a few times. Come on…..Cramer is a tool, and he got called/caught in a funny skeet because his big mouth coudn’t take a comediant’s criticism. He could bearly keep a straight face when Stewart provided great evidence during the 2006 shady advise on hedge funds (manipulate the sheeple). He’s just a puppet for the many CEOs he has been interviewing..

Whom do you preffer? Steward being funny (maybe annoying to some) or Kramer the finacial advisor/trader and screwing people with his idiotic advice?[/quote]

Cramer was wrong. I’m not defending him about that. He runs an entertainment TV show. Stewart? He does the same. They both run snake oil operations right? But Cramer is the one pretending to be serious and Stewart is the one who admits he’s not serious? That’s what I have a problem with.

NOW Cramer is the one who is admitting he’s an entertainer and NOW Stewart is the one trying to make a serious critique and do “investigative journalism” some peoples words. ITS NOT. That’s what I have a problem with. Don’t eat up everything Stewart is saying just because he’s a funny guy.

He’s not making a serious critique. Nothing he has said gets to the root of ANY problem. He has VERY little understanding of the economy and how we got here. The easiest thing for him to do is blame CNBC because they are visible. It’s a BLAME GAME. We love to see a lynching.

The rest of us cheer him on because we want someone to blame. I don’t care for Cramer. I don’t like his predictions and how many times he called a housing bottom… but Stewart is doing the ABSOLUTE same thing. The difference?

Stewart is a hero in your eyes and Cramer is a villian.

They’re BOTH snake oil salesman and NO Stewart doesn’t come clean with that, not on last nights episode anyway. He pretends that or thinks that he’s making a serious critique when he has 0 substance.

[Chris Scoreboard Johnston]

Ironically the times I have watched Kramer I thought he was funnier than that little punk Stewart anyway. I do recall him telling people that if they did not need their money in the next 3 years to get out of the stock market, and that was at significantly higher levels than where we are now, so not every one of them was wrong. Another example of how nobody takes responsibility for their own lives, everything is somebody else’s fault.

Even you liberals know the only reason he went after him at all is that he criticized Barry ( Obama ). He is a lifelong democrat but he went against the cause when he spoke his mind and now look what happened. They are trying to suppress dissent as much as they can, we will see more and more of this as we move along.

[Chris Scoreboard Johnston]

Ironically the times I have watched Kramer I thought he was funnier than that little punk Stewart anyway. I do recall him telling people that if they did not need their money in the next 3 years to get out of the stock market, and that was at significantly higher levels than where we are now, so not every one of them was wrong. Another example of how nobody takes responsibility for their own lives, everything is somebody else’s fault.

Even you liberals know the only reason he went after him at all is that he criticized Barry ( Obama ). He is a lifelong democrat but he went against the cause when he spoke his mind and now look what happened. They are trying to suppress dissent as much as they can, we will see more and more of this as we move along.

[Chris Scoreboard Johnston]

Ironically the times I have watched Kramer I thought he was funnier than that little punk Stewart anyway. I do recall him telling people that if they did not need their money in the next 3 years to get out of the stock market, and that was at significantly higher levels than where we are now, so not every one of them was wrong. Another example of how nobody takes responsibility for their own lives, everything is somebody else’s fault.

Even you liberals know the only reason he went after him at all is that he criticized Barry ( Obama ). He is a lifelong democrat but he went against the cause when he spoke his mind and now look what happened. They are trying to suppress dissent as much as they can, we will see more and more of this as we move along.

[Chris Scoreboard Johnston]

Ironically the times I have watched Kramer I thought he was funnier than that little punk Stewart anyway. I do recall him telling people that if they did not need their money in the next 3 years to get out of the stock market, and that was at significantly higher levels than where we are now, so not every one of them was wrong. Another example of how nobody takes responsibility for their own lives, everything is somebody else’s fault.

Even you liberals know the only reason he went after him at all is that he criticized Barry ( Obama ). He is a lifelong democrat but he went against the cause when he spoke his mind and now look what happened. They are trying to suppress dissent as much as they can, we will see more and more of this as we move along.

[Author]

Posts