Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Jim Cramer gets Pounded by John Stewart on the Daily Show
- This topic has 590 replies, 35 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by
CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 13, 2009 at 5:15 PM #366139March 13, 2009 at 5:31 PM #365544
danthedart
ParticipantHe’s making a serious critique at CNBC and Cramer?
If this is a serious critique, its really flawed. We have to rehash the same argument again. Again, who would blame CNBC and Cramer for this economic crisis? Why single them out? I don’t consider that a serious critique. I consider that a ratings play.
Cramer is an easy target. He made bad stock picks on TV. Stewart got him on the show to humiliate him, and he did it. So what? That doesn’t mean he has a serious critique of anything. That doesn’t mean that Stewart knows anything about investing or how the market works.
All he knows is that Cramer was wrong…and Stewart is quick enough and witty enough and funny enough to blast Cramer into the ground.
March 13, 2009 at 5:31 PM #365834ParticipantHe’s making a serious critique at CNBC and Cramer?
If this is a serious critique, its really flawed. We have to rehash the same argument again. Again, who would blame CNBC and Cramer for this economic crisis? Why single them out? I don’t consider that a serious critique. I consider that a ratings play.
Cramer is an easy target. He made bad stock picks on TV. Stewart got him on the show to humiliate him, and he did it. So what? That doesn’t mean he has a serious critique of anything. That doesn’t mean that Stewart knows anything about investing or how the market works.
All he knows is that Cramer was wrong…and Stewart is quick enough and witty enough and funny enough to blast Cramer into the ground.
March 13, 2009 at 5:31 PM #365996ParticipantHe’s making a serious critique at CNBC and Cramer?
If this is a serious critique, its really flawed. We have to rehash the same argument again. Again, who would blame CNBC and Cramer for this economic crisis? Why single them out? I don’t consider that a serious critique. I consider that a ratings play.
Cramer is an easy target. He made bad stock picks on TV. Stewart got him on the show to humiliate him, and he did it. So what? That doesn’t mean he has a serious critique of anything. That doesn’t mean that Stewart knows anything about investing or how the market works.
All he knows is that Cramer was wrong…and Stewart is quick enough and witty enough and funny enough to blast Cramer into the ground.
March 13, 2009 at 5:31 PM #366032ParticipantHe’s making a serious critique at CNBC and Cramer?
If this is a serious critique, its really flawed. We have to rehash the same argument again. Again, who would blame CNBC and Cramer for this economic crisis? Why single them out? I don’t consider that a serious critique. I consider that a ratings play.
Cramer is an easy target. He made bad stock picks on TV. Stewart got him on the show to humiliate him, and he did it. So what? That doesn’t mean he has a serious critique of anything. That doesn’t mean that Stewart knows anything about investing or how the market works.
All he knows is that Cramer was wrong…and Stewart is quick enough and witty enough and funny enough to blast Cramer into the ground.
March 13, 2009 at 5:31 PM #366144ParticipantHe’s making a serious critique at CNBC and Cramer?
If this is a serious critique, its really flawed. We have to rehash the same argument again. Again, who would blame CNBC and Cramer for this economic crisis? Why single them out? I don’t consider that a serious critique. I consider that a ratings play.
Cramer is an easy target. He made bad stock picks on TV. Stewart got him on the show to humiliate him, and he did it. So what? That doesn’t mean he has a serious critique of anything. That doesn’t mean that Stewart knows anything about investing or how the market works.
All he knows is that Cramer was wrong…and Stewart is quick enough and witty enough and funny enough to blast Cramer into the ground.
March 13, 2009 at 5:50 PM #365554patientrenter
Participant[quote=danthedart]…..All he knows is that Cramer was wrong…and Stewart is quick enough and witty enough and funny enough to blast Cramer into the ground. [/quote]
God, that must have been fun to watch.
March 13, 2009 at 5:50 PM #365844Participant[quote=danthedart]…..All he knows is that Cramer was wrong…and Stewart is quick enough and witty enough and funny enough to blast Cramer into the ground. [/quote]
God, that must have been fun to watch.
March 13, 2009 at 5:50 PM #366006Participant[quote=danthedart]…..All he knows is that Cramer was wrong…and Stewart is quick enough and witty enough and funny enough to blast Cramer into the ground. [/quote]
God, that must have been fun to watch.
March 13, 2009 at 5:50 PM #366042Participant[quote=danthedart]…..All he knows is that Cramer was wrong…and Stewart is quick enough and witty enough and funny enough to blast Cramer into the ground. [/quote]
God, that must have been fun to watch.
March 13, 2009 at 5:50 PM #366154Participant[quote=danthedart]…..All he knows is that Cramer was wrong…and Stewart is quick enough and witty enough and funny enough to blast Cramer into the ground. [/quote]
God, that must have been fun to watch.
March 13, 2009 at 6:00 PM #365569Enorah
Participant[quote=patientrenter][quote=danthedart]…..All he knows is that Cramer was wrong…and Stewart is quick enough and witty enough and funny enough to blast Cramer into the ground. [/quote]
God, that must have been fun to watch.
[/quote]It really was not that fun to watch. Stewart seemed to get really pissed at one point. It was not comedy. It was investigative journalism. That was Stewart’s point. If you are going to call yourself a news network, then you ought to do some investigating on your own as opposed to taking the CEO’s word as truth. I also think it is total bs that “none of them knew” (meaning CNBC reporters) this was going to happen or could happen. Enough of us here knew this could happen and that it probably would happen for years now.
March 13, 2009 at 6:00 PM #365859Participant[quote=patientrenter][quote=danthedart]…..All he knows is that Cramer was wrong…and Stewart is quick enough and witty enough and funny enough to blast Cramer into the ground. [/quote]
God, that must have been fun to watch.
[/quote]It really was not that fun to watch. Stewart seemed to get really pissed at one point. It was not comedy. It was investigative journalism. That was Stewart’s point. If you are going to call yourself a news network, then you ought to do some investigating on your own as opposed to taking the CEO’s word as truth. I also think it is total bs that “none of them knew” (meaning CNBC reporters) this was going to happen or could happen. Enough of us here knew this could happen and that it probably would happen for years now.
March 13, 2009 at 6:00 PM #366021Participant[quote=patientrenter][quote=danthedart]…..All he knows is that Cramer was wrong…and Stewart is quick enough and witty enough and funny enough to blast Cramer into the ground. [/quote]
God, that must have been fun to watch.
[/quote]It really was not that fun to watch. Stewart seemed to get really pissed at one point. It was not comedy. It was investigative journalism. That was Stewart’s point. If you are going to call yourself a news network, then you ought to do some investigating on your own as opposed to taking the CEO’s word as truth. I also think it is total bs that “none of them knew” (meaning CNBC reporters) this was going to happen or could happen. Enough of us here knew this could happen and that it probably would happen for years now.
March 13, 2009 at 6:00 PM #366057Participant[quote=patientrenter][quote=danthedart]…..All he knows is that Cramer was wrong…and Stewart is quick enough and witty enough and funny enough to blast Cramer into the ground. [/quote]
God, that must have been fun to watch.
[/quote]It really was not that fun to watch. Stewart seemed to get really pissed at one point. It was not comedy. It was investigative journalism. That was Stewart’s point. If you are going to call yourself a news network, then you ought to do some investigating on your own as opposed to taking the CEO’s word as truth. I also think it is total bs that “none of them knew” (meaning CNBC reporters) this was going to happen or could happen. Enough of us here knew this could happen and that it probably would happen for years now.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.