jcfuquette must go

[afx114]

Hey Rich, you could probably modify the query to pull all topics not in the OT forum. It would be a pretty simple tweak, so if it’s something you might consider doing, let me know if you need any help with that.

[Raybyrnes]

Rich,

The fact that you list a separate category called off toppic is good enough for me. I know when I visit this thread it is not necessarily going to be about real estate. I say leave everything the way it is. If you don’t care for a thread STOP READING.

[Raybyrnes]

Rich,

The fact that you list a separate category called off toppic is good enough for me. I know when I visit this thread it is not necessarily going to be about real estate. I say leave everything the way it is. If you don’t care for a thread STOP READING.

[Raybyrnes]

Rich,

The fact that you list a separate category called off toppic is good enough for me. I know when I visit this thread it is not necessarily going to be about real estate. I say leave everything the way it is. If you don’t care for a thread STOP READING.

[Raybyrnes]

Rich,

The fact that you list a separate category called off toppic is good enough for me. I know when I visit this thread it is not necessarily going to be about real estate. I say leave everything the way it is. If you don’t care for a thread STOP READING.

[Raybyrnes]

Rich,

The fact that you list a separate category called off toppic is good enough for me. I know when I visit this thread it is not necessarily going to be about real estate. I say leave everything the way it is. If you don’t care for a thread STOP READING.

[temeculaguy]

Alan,

Regarding the show, http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/06/03/its-showtime-for-inside-the-nfl/

I’m not signing up for showtime just yet, the talent list just isn’t the same, they had the mix just perfect and without Collinsworth (the best analyst alive) or Costas and King (the best insider), I don’t know that it will retain “keep until I delete” status on my TIVO. Time will tell.

With regards to the raiders, they already have head cases, they are violationg the “one head case player per team” rule and that rule only works with a strong coach (Moss-Belichic or T.O.-Parcells), I am still waiting for T.O. to melt down becuse Wade Phillips isn’t strong enough to control him. If you get more than one head case, they feed off each other and try to outdo each other, ie. 2007 Bengals. This rule applies to families and workplaces, more than one and things go to hell.

[temeculaguy]

Alan,

Regarding the show, http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/06/03/its-showtime-for-inside-the-nfl/

I’m not signing up for showtime just yet, the talent list just isn’t the same, they had the mix just perfect and without Collinsworth (the best analyst alive) or Costas and King (the best insider), I don’t know that it will retain “keep until I delete” status on my TIVO. Time will tell.

With regards to the raiders, they already have head cases, they are violationg the “one head case player per team” rule and that rule only works with a strong coach (Moss-Belichic or T.O.-Parcells), I am still waiting for T.O. to melt down becuse Wade Phillips isn’t strong enough to control him. If you get more than one head case, they feed off each other and try to outdo each other, ie. 2007 Bengals. This rule applies to families and workplaces, more than one and things go to hell.

[temeculaguy]

Alan,

Regarding the show, http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/06/03/its-showtime-for-inside-the-nfl/

I’m not signing up for showtime just yet, the talent list just isn’t the same, they had the mix just perfect and without Collinsworth (the best analyst alive) or Costas and King (the best insider), I don’t know that it will retain “keep until I delete” status on my TIVO. Time will tell.

With regards to the raiders, they already have head cases, they are violationg the “one head case player per team” rule and that rule only works with a strong coach (Moss-Belichic or T.O.-Parcells), I am still waiting for T.O. to melt down becuse Wade Phillips isn’t strong enough to control him. If you get more than one head case, they feed off each other and try to outdo each other, ie. 2007 Bengals. This rule applies to families and workplaces, more than one and things go to hell.

[temeculaguy]

Alan,

Regarding the show, http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/06/03/its-showtime-for-inside-the-nfl/

I’m not signing up for showtime just yet, the talent list just isn’t the same, they had the mix just perfect and without Collinsworth (the best analyst alive) or Costas and King (the best insider), I don’t know that it will retain “keep until I delete” status on my TIVO. Time will tell.

With regards to the raiders, they already have head cases, they are violationg the “one head case player per team” rule and that rule only works with a strong coach (Moss-Belichic or T.O.-Parcells), I am still waiting for T.O. to melt down becuse Wade Phillips isn’t strong enough to control him. If you get more than one head case, they feed off each other and try to outdo each other, ie. 2007 Bengals. This rule applies to families and workplaces, more than one and things go to hell.

[temeculaguy]

Alan,

Regarding the show, http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/06/03/its-showtime-for-inside-the-nfl/

I’m not signing up for showtime just yet, the talent list just isn’t the same, they had the mix just perfect and without Collinsworth (the best analyst alive) or Costas and King (the best insider), I don’t know that it will retain “keep until I delete” status on my TIVO. Time will tell.

With regards to the raiders, they already have head cases, they are violationg the “one head case player per team” rule and that rule only works with a strong coach (Moss-Belichic or T.O.-Parcells), I am still waiting for T.O. to melt down becuse Wade Phillips isn’t strong enough to control him. If you get more than one head case, they feed off each other and try to outdo each other, ie. 2007 Bengals. This rule applies to families and workplaces, more than one and things go to hell.

[34f3f3f]

I agree that off topic is essential to give people something to talk about when there’s nothing to report in real estate, but this is blatant electioneering, and in my view has no place here. It’s an attempt to use the internet to fight Obama on his home turf. There was a recent post that asked where everybody has gone? This kind of shallow political posturing may be one reason. It certainly has turned me off, and I’ve been spending more time on other blogs. One way to deal with them is just to ignore them completely, and they will pass down the active topics list quickly.

[34f3f3f]

I agree that off topic is essential to give people something to talk about when there’s nothing to report in real estate, but this is blatant electioneering, and in my view has no place here. It’s an attempt to use the internet to fight Obama on his home turf. There was a recent post that asked where everybody has gone? This kind of shallow political posturing may be one reason. It certainly has turned me off, and I’ve been spending more time on other blogs. One way to deal with them is just to ignore them completely, and they will pass down the active topics list quickly.

[34f3f3f]

I agree that off topic is essential to give people something to talk about when there’s nothing to report in real estate, but this is blatant electioneering, and in my view has no place here. It’s an attempt to use the internet to fight Obama on his home turf. There was a recent post that asked where everybody has gone? This kind of shallow political posturing may be one reason. It certainly has turned me off, and I’ve been spending more time on other blogs. One way to deal with them is just to ignore them completely, and they will pass down the active topics list quickly.

[34f3f3f]

I agree that off topic is essential to give people something to talk about when there’s nothing to report in real estate, but this is blatant electioneering, and in my view has no place here. It’s an attempt to use the internet to fight Obama on his home turf. There was a recent post that asked where everybody has gone? This kind of shallow political posturing may be one reason. It certainly has turned me off, and I’ve been spending more time on other blogs. One way to deal with them is just to ignore them completely, and they will pass down the active topics list quickly.

[Author]

Posts