IvyGate properties in 4S Ranch

[Eugene]

The former owner of 16344 Winecreek got his notice of default on … (drumroll)… April 24, 2008. I wonder how he managed to hold on to the property for that long?

[briansd1]

[quote=jpinpb]
They probably sold their condo d/t or maybe even Mira Mesa. ;)[/quote]

jpinpb, those fictitious owners will be able to hang on in 4S only they actually rolled over the equity, or saved it away.

I came across a Chinese couple who bought their house in Clairemont back in the early 80s for like $100,000. They rented out the house and it’s now been foreclosed upon. I talked to the renters who got about 3 months free rent. But the renters moved out so they didn’t get cash for keys.

On SDlookup, you pointed quite a few owners who squandered their equity away. Remember that Realtor who owns the places at The Grande, Point Loma and El Cajon with NODs? The one who claims to have bought and sold 50 houses on his own account over the years, but yet can’t manage the wherewithal to keep what he has.

[briansd1]

[quote=jpinpb]
They probably sold their condo d/t or maybe even Mira Mesa. ;)[/quote]

jpinpb, those fictitious owners will be able to hang on in 4S only they actually rolled over the equity, or saved it away.

I came across a Chinese couple who bought their house in Clairemont back in the early 80s for like $100,000. They rented out the house and it’s now been foreclosed upon. I talked to the renters who got about 3 months free rent. But the renters moved out so they didn’t get cash for keys.

On SDlookup, you pointed quite a few owners who squandered their equity away. Remember that Realtor who owns the places at The Grande, Point Loma and El Cajon with NODs? The one who claims to have bought and sold 50 houses on his own account over the years, but yet can’t manage the wherewithal to keep what he has.

[briansd1]

[quote=jpinpb]
They probably sold their condo d/t or maybe even Mira Mesa. ;)[/quote]

jpinpb, those fictitious owners will be able to hang on in 4S only they actually rolled over the equity, or saved it away.

I came across a Chinese couple who bought their house in Clairemont back in the early 80s for like $100,000. They rented out the house and it’s now been foreclosed upon. I talked to the renters who got about 3 months free rent. But the renters moved out so they didn’t get cash for keys.

On SDlookup, you pointed quite a few owners who squandered their equity away. Remember that Realtor who owns the places at The Grande, Point Loma and El Cajon with NODs? The one who claims to have bought and sold 50 houses on his own account over the years, but yet can’t manage the wherewithal to keep what he has.

[briansd1]

[quote=jpinpb]
They probably sold their condo d/t or maybe even Mira Mesa. ;)[/quote]

jpinpb, those fictitious owners will be able to hang on in 4S only they actually rolled over the equity, or saved it away.

I came across a Chinese couple who bought their house in Clairemont back in the early 80s for like $100,000. They rented out the house and it’s now been foreclosed upon. I talked to the renters who got about 3 months free rent. But the renters moved out so they didn’t get cash for keys.

On SDlookup, you pointed quite a few owners who squandered their equity away. Remember that Realtor who owns the places at The Grande, Point Loma and El Cajon with NODs? The one who claims to have bought and sold 50 houses on his own account over the years, but yet can’t manage the wherewithal to keep what he has.

[briansd1]

[quote=jpinpb]
They probably sold their condo d/t or maybe even Mira Mesa. ;)[/quote]

jpinpb, those fictitious owners will be able to hang on in 4S only they actually rolled over the equity, or saved it away.

I came across a Chinese couple who bought their house in Clairemont back in the early 80s for like $100,000. They rented out the house and it’s now been foreclosed upon. I talked to the renters who got about 3 months free rent. But the renters moved out so they didn’t get cash for keys.

On SDlookup, you pointed quite a few owners who squandered their equity away. Remember that Realtor who owns the places at The Grande, Point Loma and El Cajon with NODs? The one who claims to have bought and sold 50 houses on his own account over the years, but yet can’t manage the wherewithal to keep what he has.

[an]

[quote=jpinpb]
They probably sold their condo d/t or maybe even Mira Mesa. ;)[/quote]
Yep they probably did and those who bought from them are part of the tsunami we’ll see. Any idea when we’ll see that tsunami? I know a few who could use some good news.

[an]

[quote=jpinpb]
They probably sold their condo d/t or maybe even Mira Mesa. ;)[/quote]
Yep they probably did and those who bought from them are part of the tsunami we’ll see. Any idea when we’ll see that tsunami? I know a few who could use some good news.

[an]

[quote=jpinpb]
They probably sold their condo d/t or maybe even Mira Mesa. ;)[/quote]
Yep they probably did and those who bought from them are part of the tsunami we’ll see. Any idea when we’ll see that tsunami? I know a few who could use some good news.

[an]

[quote=jpinpb]
They probably sold their condo d/t or maybe even Mira Mesa. ;)[/quote]
Yep they probably did and those who bought from them are part of the tsunami we’ll see. Any idea when we’ll see that tsunami? I know a few who could use some good news.

[an]

[quote=jpinpb]
They probably sold their condo d/t or maybe even Mira Mesa. ;)[/quote]
Yep they probably did and those who bought from them are part of the tsunami we’ll see. Any idea when we’ll see that tsunami? I know a few who could use some good news.

[jpinpb]

[quote=Eugene]The former owner of 16344 Winecreek got his notice of default on … (drumroll)… April 24, 2008. I wonder how he managed to hold on to the property for that long?[/quote]

Banks are dragging their feet, or haven’t you heard. Maybe he made a payment here and there, just enough to prolong the process. Seeing properties not go to foreclosure in a year and a half is not uncommon.

I see places that go to foreclosure and very often it takes a year plus.

[jpinpb]

[quote=Eugene]The former owner of 16344 Winecreek got his notice of default on … (drumroll)… April 24, 2008. I wonder how he managed to hold on to the property for that long?[/quote]

Banks are dragging their feet, or haven’t you heard. Maybe he made a payment here and there, just enough to prolong the process. Seeing properties not go to foreclosure in a year and a half is not uncommon.

I see places that go to foreclosure and very often it takes a year plus.

[jpinpb]

[quote=Eugene]The former owner of 16344 Winecreek got his notice of default on … (drumroll)… April 24, 2008. I wonder how he managed to hold on to the property for that long?[/quote]

Banks are dragging their feet, or haven’t you heard. Maybe he made a payment here and there, just enough to prolong the process. Seeing properties not go to foreclosure in a year and a half is not uncommon.

I see places that go to foreclosure and very often it takes a year plus.

[jpinpb]

[quote=Eugene]The former owner of 16344 Winecreek got his notice of default on … (drumroll)… April 24, 2008. I wonder how he managed to hold on to the property for that long?[/quote]

Banks are dragging their feet, or haven’t you heard. Maybe he made a payment here and there, just enough to prolong the process. Seeing properties not go to foreclosure in a year and a half is not uncommon.

I see places that go to foreclosure and very often it takes a year plus.

[Author]

Posts