- This topic has 90 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 11 months ago by
safigueroa12.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 2, 2008 at 4:28 PM #128249January 2, 2008 at 4:28 PM #127987
safigueroa12
Participantnostradamus,
You are a funny character.
I really enjoy this website, besides saving money, I get a good laugh. Keep up the good work!SAF
January 2, 2008 at 4:28 PM #128152safigueroa12
Participantnostradamus,
You are a funny character.
I really enjoy this website, besides saving money, I get a good laugh. Keep up the good work!SAF
January 2, 2008 at 4:28 PM #128161safigueroa12
Participantnostradamus,
You are a funny character.
I really enjoy this website, besides saving money, I get a good laugh. Keep up the good work!SAF
January 2, 2008 at 4:28 PM #128230safigueroa12
Participantnostradamus,
You are a funny character.
I really enjoy this website, besides saving money, I get a good laugh. Keep up the good work!SAF
January 2, 2008 at 4:28 PM #128259safigueroa12
Participantnostradamus,
You are a funny character.
I really enjoy this website, besides saving money, I get a good laugh. Keep up the good work!SAF
January 2, 2008 at 9:13 PM #128203masayako
ParticipantThe real question is:
Is the Slump Started Yet?
January 2, 2008 at 9:13 PM #128367masayako
ParticipantThe real question is:
Is the Slump Started Yet?
January 2, 2008 at 9:13 PM #128379masayako
ParticipantThe real question is:
Is the Slump Started Yet?
January 2, 2008 at 9:13 PM #128445masayako
ParticipantThe real question is:
Is the Slump Started Yet?
January 2, 2008 at 9:13 PM #128473masayako
ParticipantThe real question is:
Is the Slump Started Yet?
January 3, 2008 at 9:45 AM #128433safigueroa12
ParticipantIt sure has… at least in the SF Valley area.
3 bedroom homes prior listed at $550K a year ago are listed for $400K today.
These homes were $125K to $150K in 1997 and even if they were to double their value within ten years, they still have to come down another $150K.
Buying today is trying to catch a falling knife!
Some people claim that if you buy a home to stay put at least ten years then you will be okay. I hate to be pessimistic, how do I know that I may not need to sell prior to the market rebound.SAF
January 3, 2008 at 9:45 AM #128598safigueroa12
ParticipantIt sure has… at least in the SF Valley area.
3 bedroom homes prior listed at $550K a year ago are listed for $400K today.
These homes were $125K to $150K in 1997 and even if they were to double their value within ten years, they still have to come down another $150K.
Buying today is trying to catch a falling knife!
Some people claim that if you buy a home to stay put at least ten years then you will be okay. I hate to be pessimistic, how do I know that I may not need to sell prior to the market rebound.SAF
January 3, 2008 at 9:45 AM #128606safigueroa12
ParticipantIt sure has… at least in the SF Valley area.
3 bedroom homes prior listed at $550K a year ago are listed for $400K today.
These homes were $125K to $150K in 1997 and even if they were to double their value within ten years, they still have to come down another $150K.
Buying today is trying to catch a falling knife!
Some people claim that if you buy a home to stay put at least ten years then you will be okay. I hate to be pessimistic, how do I know that I may not need to sell prior to the market rebound.SAF
January 3, 2008 at 9:45 AM #128675safigueroa12
ParticipantIt sure has… at least in the SF Valley area.
3 bedroom homes prior listed at $550K a year ago are listed for $400K today.
These homes were $125K to $150K in 1997 and even if they were to double their value within ten years, they still have to come down another $150K.
Buying today is trying to catch a falling knife!
Some people claim that if you buy a home to stay put at least ten years then you will be okay. I hate to be pessimistic, how do I know that I may not need to sell prior to the market rebound.SAF
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
