Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Is it just me?
- This topic has 270 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by patientrenter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 19, 2009 at 3:43 PM #384877April 19, 2009 at 4:09 PM #384249patientrenterParticipant
[quote=CONCHO]The banks aren’t gonna list those REOs until they are forced to. And guess what, they aren’t going to be forced to because their buddies in the government will keep shovelling OUR money THEIR way. Essentially we have a sort of Soviet system now where the government is paying for housing. Why move out or pay your mortgage when the bank won’t kick you out? Dammit if I knew then what I know now I would have:
1) Bought as many houses as possible with as many crazy loans as I could have gotten.
2) Flipped as many as I could have and used the proceeds to buy some real property in cash out of the country somewhere.
3) Stayed in the nicest, most expensive and hardest-to-sell one here in SD.
4) Stopped making payments on it in 2008.
Hell I’m sure they wouldn’t have kicked me out by now. I’d probably have a couple of more years scot-free there until the sheriff showed up. By then I would have saved a BUNDLE and I’d shuffle off to my foreign retreat.
What sickens me most is the knowledge that quite a few people have done what I just described, AND THEY’RE GOING TO GET AWAY WITH IT with our government’s help. AAAARRRRGH!
[/quote]
That’s exactly right, CONCHO. But don’t forget that it’s all in a good cause – to save our economy. It’s for our own good.
April 19, 2009 at 4:09 PM #384518patientrenterParticipant[quote=CONCHO]The banks aren’t gonna list those REOs until they are forced to. And guess what, they aren’t going to be forced to because their buddies in the government will keep shovelling OUR money THEIR way. Essentially we have a sort of Soviet system now where the government is paying for housing. Why move out or pay your mortgage when the bank won’t kick you out? Dammit if I knew then what I know now I would have:
1) Bought as many houses as possible with as many crazy loans as I could have gotten.
2) Flipped as many as I could have and used the proceeds to buy some real property in cash out of the country somewhere.
3) Stayed in the nicest, most expensive and hardest-to-sell one here in SD.
4) Stopped making payments on it in 2008.
Hell I’m sure they wouldn’t have kicked me out by now. I’d probably have a couple of more years scot-free there until the sheriff showed up. By then I would have saved a BUNDLE and I’d shuffle off to my foreign retreat.
What sickens me most is the knowledge that quite a few people have done what I just described, AND THEY’RE GOING TO GET AWAY WITH IT with our government’s help. AAAARRRRGH!
[/quote]
That’s exactly right, CONCHO. But don’t forget that it’s all in a good cause – to save our economy. It’s for our own good.
April 19, 2009 at 4:09 PM #384716patientrenterParticipant[quote=CONCHO]The banks aren’t gonna list those REOs until they are forced to. And guess what, they aren’t going to be forced to because their buddies in the government will keep shovelling OUR money THEIR way. Essentially we have a sort of Soviet system now where the government is paying for housing. Why move out or pay your mortgage when the bank won’t kick you out? Dammit if I knew then what I know now I would have:
1) Bought as many houses as possible with as many crazy loans as I could have gotten.
2) Flipped as many as I could have and used the proceeds to buy some real property in cash out of the country somewhere.
3) Stayed in the nicest, most expensive and hardest-to-sell one here in SD.
4) Stopped making payments on it in 2008.
Hell I’m sure they wouldn’t have kicked me out by now. I’d probably have a couple of more years scot-free there until the sheriff showed up. By then I would have saved a BUNDLE and I’d shuffle off to my foreign retreat.
What sickens me most is the knowledge that quite a few people have done what I just described, AND THEY’RE GOING TO GET AWAY WITH IT with our government’s help. AAAARRRRGH!
[/quote]
That’s exactly right, CONCHO. But don’t forget that it’s all in a good cause – to save our economy. It’s for our own good.
April 19, 2009 at 4:09 PM #384765patientrenterParticipant[quote=CONCHO]The banks aren’t gonna list those REOs until they are forced to. And guess what, they aren’t going to be forced to because their buddies in the government will keep shovelling OUR money THEIR way. Essentially we have a sort of Soviet system now where the government is paying for housing. Why move out or pay your mortgage when the bank won’t kick you out? Dammit if I knew then what I know now I would have:
1) Bought as many houses as possible with as many crazy loans as I could have gotten.
2) Flipped as many as I could have and used the proceeds to buy some real property in cash out of the country somewhere.
3) Stayed in the nicest, most expensive and hardest-to-sell one here in SD.
4) Stopped making payments on it in 2008.
Hell I’m sure they wouldn’t have kicked me out by now. I’d probably have a couple of more years scot-free there until the sheriff showed up. By then I would have saved a BUNDLE and I’d shuffle off to my foreign retreat.
What sickens me most is the knowledge that quite a few people have done what I just described, AND THEY’RE GOING TO GET AWAY WITH IT with our government’s help. AAAARRRRGH!
[/quote]
That’s exactly right, CONCHO. But don’t forget that it’s all in a good cause – to save our economy. It’s for our own good.
April 19, 2009 at 4:09 PM #384902patientrenterParticipant[quote=CONCHO]The banks aren’t gonna list those REOs until they are forced to. And guess what, they aren’t going to be forced to because their buddies in the government will keep shovelling OUR money THEIR way. Essentially we have a sort of Soviet system now where the government is paying for housing. Why move out or pay your mortgage when the bank won’t kick you out? Dammit if I knew then what I know now I would have:
1) Bought as many houses as possible with as many crazy loans as I could have gotten.
2) Flipped as many as I could have and used the proceeds to buy some real property in cash out of the country somewhere.
3) Stayed in the nicest, most expensive and hardest-to-sell one here in SD.
4) Stopped making payments on it in 2008.
Hell I’m sure they wouldn’t have kicked me out by now. I’d probably have a couple of more years scot-free there until the sheriff showed up. By then I would have saved a BUNDLE and I’d shuffle off to my foreign retreat.
What sickens me most is the knowledge that quite a few people have done what I just described, AND THEY’RE GOING TO GET AWAY WITH IT with our government’s help. AAAARRRRGH!
[/quote]
That’s exactly right, CONCHO. But don’t forget that it’s all in a good cause – to save our economy. It’s for our own good.
April 19, 2009 at 4:13 PM #384254jpinpbParticipantOkay. I just went through my weekly NOD and foreclosure search. I have noticed that a lot of properties that in January had NODs but were not listed (and still not) are scheduled for foreclosure. This surprised me. But it’s in line w/3 months. So maybe – just maybe, the banks will actually foreclose and we will see them listed soon thereafter.
If this is going to be true, then look out for the February and March NODs. It may be one heck of a summer.
April 19, 2009 at 4:13 PM #384523jpinpbParticipantOkay. I just went through my weekly NOD and foreclosure search. I have noticed that a lot of properties that in January had NODs but were not listed (and still not) are scheduled for foreclosure. This surprised me. But it’s in line w/3 months. So maybe – just maybe, the banks will actually foreclose and we will see them listed soon thereafter.
If this is going to be true, then look out for the February and March NODs. It may be one heck of a summer.
April 19, 2009 at 4:13 PM #384721jpinpbParticipantOkay. I just went through my weekly NOD and foreclosure search. I have noticed that a lot of properties that in January had NODs but were not listed (and still not) are scheduled for foreclosure. This surprised me. But it’s in line w/3 months. So maybe – just maybe, the banks will actually foreclose and we will see them listed soon thereafter.
If this is going to be true, then look out for the February and March NODs. It may be one heck of a summer.
April 19, 2009 at 4:13 PM #384769jpinpbParticipantOkay. I just went through my weekly NOD and foreclosure search. I have noticed that a lot of properties that in January had NODs but were not listed (and still not) are scheduled for foreclosure. This surprised me. But it’s in line w/3 months. So maybe – just maybe, the banks will actually foreclose and we will see them listed soon thereafter.
If this is going to be true, then look out for the February and March NODs. It may be one heck of a summer.
April 19, 2009 at 4:13 PM #384907jpinpbParticipantOkay. I just went through my weekly NOD and foreclosure search. I have noticed that a lot of properties that in January had NODs but were not listed (and still not) are scheduled for foreclosure. This surprised me. But it’s in line w/3 months. So maybe – just maybe, the banks will actually foreclose and we will see them listed soon thereafter.
If this is going to be true, then look out for the February and March NODs. It may be one heck of a summer.
April 19, 2009 at 4:28 PM #384264patientrenterParticipant[quote=jpinpb]Okay. I just went through my weekly NOD and foreclosure search. I have noticed that a lot of properties that in January had NODs but were not listed (and still not) are scheduled for foreclosure. This surprised me. But it’s in line w/3 months. So maybe – just maybe, the banks will actually foreclose and we will see them listed soon thereafter.
If this is going to be true, then look out for the February and March NODs. It may be one heck of a summer. [/quote]
jpnpb, my thanks for sharing your original and timely research with us. I, and a few of us, are guilty of mostly just bloviating here, but this is hard data that is useful.
April 19, 2009 at 4:28 PM #384533patientrenterParticipant[quote=jpinpb]Okay. I just went through my weekly NOD and foreclosure search. I have noticed that a lot of properties that in January had NODs but were not listed (and still not) are scheduled for foreclosure. This surprised me. But it’s in line w/3 months. So maybe – just maybe, the banks will actually foreclose and we will see them listed soon thereafter.
If this is going to be true, then look out for the February and March NODs. It may be one heck of a summer. [/quote]
jpnpb, my thanks for sharing your original and timely research with us. I, and a few of us, are guilty of mostly just bloviating here, but this is hard data that is useful.
April 19, 2009 at 4:28 PM #384731patientrenterParticipant[quote=jpinpb]Okay. I just went through my weekly NOD and foreclosure search. I have noticed that a lot of properties that in January had NODs but were not listed (and still not) are scheduled for foreclosure. This surprised me. But it’s in line w/3 months. So maybe – just maybe, the banks will actually foreclose and we will see them listed soon thereafter.
If this is going to be true, then look out for the February and March NODs. It may be one heck of a summer. [/quote]
jpnpb, my thanks for sharing your original and timely research with us. I, and a few of us, are guilty of mostly just bloviating here, but this is hard data that is useful.
April 19, 2009 at 4:28 PM #384780patientrenterParticipant[quote=jpinpb]Okay. I just went through my weekly NOD and foreclosure search. I have noticed that a lot of properties that in January had NODs but were not listed (and still not) are scheduled for foreclosure. This surprised me. But it’s in line w/3 months. So maybe – just maybe, the banks will actually foreclose and we will see them listed soon thereafter.
If this is going to be true, then look out for the February and March NODs. It may be one heck of a summer. [/quote]
jpnpb, my thanks for sharing your original and timely research with us. I, and a few of us, are guilty of mostly just bloviating here, but this is hard data that is useful.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.