- This topic has 35 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by HLS.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 30, 2009 at 8:06 AM #375024March 30, 2009 at 8:28 AM #375049HLSParticipant
WH,,
Sounds like you got some great advice there…
Did you get one of those expensive “no cost loans” ?Did they tell you that your rate could have been under 5% fixed for 30 years ?
That with the exact same amount of cash that you used you could be in a MUCH better loan, fixed for 30 years and you could be saving tens of thousands of dollars over the life of the loan ??I just signed a borrower with 40% down on a 4.875% NOO purchase.
Bad mortgage advice is REALLY expensive…HLS
March 30, 2009 at 8:28 AM #375171HLSParticipantWH,,
Sounds like you got some great advice there…
Did you get one of those expensive “no cost loans” ?Did they tell you that your rate could have been under 5% fixed for 30 years ?
That with the exact same amount of cash that you used you could be in a MUCH better loan, fixed for 30 years and you could be saving tens of thousands of dollars over the life of the loan ??I just signed a borrower with 40% down on a 4.875% NOO purchase.
Bad mortgage advice is REALLY expensive…HLS
March 30, 2009 at 8:28 AM #375006HLSParticipantWH,,
Sounds like you got some great advice there…
Did you get one of those expensive “no cost loans” ?Did they tell you that your rate could have been under 5% fixed for 30 years ?
That with the exact same amount of cash that you used you could be in a MUCH better loan, fixed for 30 years and you could be saving tens of thousands of dollars over the life of the loan ??I just signed a borrower with 40% down on a 4.875% NOO purchase.
Bad mortgage advice is REALLY expensive…HLS
March 30, 2009 at 8:28 AM #374828HLSParticipantWH,,
Sounds like you got some great advice there…
Did you get one of those expensive “no cost loans” ?Did they tell you that your rate could have been under 5% fixed for 30 years ?
That with the exact same amount of cash that you used you could be in a MUCH better loan, fixed for 30 years and you could be saving tens of thousands of dollars over the life of the loan ??I just signed a borrower with 40% down on a 4.875% NOO purchase.
Bad mortgage advice is REALLY expensive…HLS
March 30, 2009 at 8:28 AM #374548HLSParticipantWH,,
Sounds like you got some great advice there…
Did you get one of those expensive “no cost loans” ?Did they tell you that your rate could have been under 5% fixed for 30 years ?
That with the exact same amount of cash that you used you could be in a MUCH better loan, fixed for 30 years and you could be saving tens of thousands of dollars over the life of the loan ??I just signed a borrower with 40% down on a 4.875% NOO purchase.
Bad mortgage advice is REALLY expensive…HLS
March 30, 2009 at 6:44 PM #375053waiting hawkParticipantHLS was that in Aug of 2008? ok then…
on your current rate my payment would be a whole 40 a month less. OMFG where do I refi and pay closing again rofl.edit: All the “brokers” could not even come close to retail when I bought my places. Even posted a scenerio on outpost and all them said CW was the best deal and they could not touch it. Waste to go with a broker imo.
March 30, 2009 at 6:44 PM #375397waiting hawkParticipantHLS was that in Aug of 2008? ok then…
on your current rate my payment would be a whole 40 a month less. OMFG where do I refi and pay closing again rofl.edit: All the “brokers” could not even come close to retail when I bought my places. Even posted a scenerio on outpost and all them said CW was the best deal and they could not touch it. Waste to go with a broker imo.
March 30, 2009 at 6:44 PM #375275waiting hawkParticipantHLS was that in Aug of 2008? ok then…
on your current rate my payment would be a whole 40 a month less. OMFG where do I refi and pay closing again rofl.edit: All the “brokers” could not even come close to retail when I bought my places. Even posted a scenerio on outpost and all them said CW was the best deal and they could not touch it. Waste to go with a broker imo.
March 30, 2009 at 6:44 PM #375232waiting hawkParticipantHLS was that in Aug of 2008? ok then…
on your current rate my payment would be a whole 40 a month less. OMFG where do I refi and pay closing again rofl.edit: All the “brokers” could not even come close to retail when I bought my places. Even posted a scenerio on outpost and all them said CW was the best deal and they could not touch it. Waste to go with a broker imo.
March 30, 2009 at 6:44 PM #374772waiting hawkParticipantHLS was that in Aug of 2008? ok then…
on your current rate my payment would be a whole 40 a month less. OMFG where do I refi and pay closing again rofl.edit: All the “brokers” could not even come close to retail when I bought my places. Even posted a scenerio on outpost and all them said CW was the best deal and they could not touch it. Waste to go with a broker imo.
March 31, 2009 at 10:29 AM #375258RenParticipantHi HLS, quick question for you – if we have 30% equity in our primary residence, and buy another property with the intention of moving there and renting out the first, does 75% of the potential rental income of the first property count when qualifying for the second, or would it have to actually be rented?
March 31, 2009 at 10:29 AM #374977RenParticipantHi HLS, quick question for you – if we have 30% equity in our primary residence, and buy another property with the intention of moving there and renting out the first, does 75% of the potential rental income of the first property count when qualifying for the second, or would it have to actually be rented?
March 31, 2009 at 10:29 AM #375437RenParticipantHi HLS, quick question for you – if we have 30% equity in our primary residence, and buy another property with the intention of moving there and renting out the first, does 75% of the potential rental income of the first property count when qualifying for the second, or would it have to actually be rented?
March 31, 2009 at 10:29 AM #375480RenParticipantHi HLS, quick question for you – if we have 30% equity in our primary residence, and buy another property with the intention of moving there and renting out the first, does 75% of the potential rental income of the first property count when qualifying for the second, or would it have to actually be rented?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.