- This topic has 67 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by ucodegen.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 25, 2007 at 8:33 PM #91978October 25, 2007 at 9:29 PM #91951BubblesitterParticipant
Raybyrnes,
You have some good points, there is probably quite a bit of fraud losses in the insurance industry. Many folks are under-insuredYou can’t deny that a key goal of every insurance company during a disaster is to minimize payouts. It sounds like in recent years they have become more zealous in this goal.
Anyhow, I’m just hoping that folks hit by this terrible San Diego fire question and challenge their insurance companies. They need to complain if needed directly to the California insurance commissioner. http://www.insurance.ca.gov/
The insurance companies need to do a better job at delivering on their promise of “peace-of-mind”. These San diego fires are a great opportunity to improve the industry’s image.
Bubblesitter
October 25, 2007 at 9:29 PM #91991BubblesitterParticipantRaybyrnes,
You have some good points, there is probably quite a bit of fraud losses in the insurance industry. Many folks are under-insuredYou can’t deny that a key goal of every insurance company during a disaster is to minimize payouts. It sounds like in recent years they have become more zealous in this goal.
Anyhow, I’m just hoping that folks hit by this terrible San Diego fire question and challenge their insurance companies. They need to complain if needed directly to the California insurance commissioner. http://www.insurance.ca.gov/
The insurance companies need to do a better job at delivering on their promise of “peace-of-mind”. These San diego fires are a great opportunity to improve the industry’s image.
Bubblesitter
October 25, 2007 at 9:29 PM #91979BubblesitterParticipantRaybyrnes,
You have some good points, there is probably quite a bit of fraud losses in the insurance industry. Many folks are under-insuredYou can’t deny that a key goal of every insurance company during a disaster is to minimize payouts. It sounds like in recent years they have become more zealous in this goal.
Anyhow, I’m just hoping that folks hit by this terrible San Diego fire question and challenge their insurance companies. They need to complain if needed directly to the California insurance commissioner. http://www.insurance.ca.gov/
The insurance companies need to do a better job at delivering on their promise of “peace-of-mind”. These San diego fires are a great opportunity to improve the industry’s image.
Bubblesitter
October 25, 2007 at 9:44 PM #91992RaybyrnesParticipant“You can’t deny that a key goal of every insurance company during a disaster is to minimize payouts.”
The goal of all organizations is to maximise profitability and return value to shareholders.
This means adhering to sound underwriting practices that reduce their exposure on the front end. By collecting enough premiums insurance companies are able to provide long term peice of mind and get policy owners back to where they were before.
To accomplish this means that they often times having to deny claims that fall outside standard deviations and require owners to produce necessary documentation.
There are two side to the insurance industry. To grow profits they must aquire policyhoders. If policy owners lose faith in a company or begin to believe that insurers are not delivering on their promise they will lose policyholders. When insurers forget this premise they don’t have to worry about payouts because they will not have any customers.
Unfortunately it is an adjuster who has to bring people back to the reality that while the landscaping cost a fortune it was only covered up to the policy limits. By doing thisw they are able to provide a far greater net value to all of their constituents. It is a utilitarian principal. Greatest good for greatest number of people. Not perfect but all we got.
October 25, 2007 at 9:44 PM #92003RaybyrnesParticipant“You can’t deny that a key goal of every insurance company during a disaster is to minimize payouts.”
The goal of all organizations is to maximise profitability and return value to shareholders.
This means adhering to sound underwriting practices that reduce their exposure on the front end. By collecting enough premiums insurance companies are able to provide long term peice of mind and get policy owners back to where they were before.
To accomplish this means that they often times having to deny claims that fall outside standard deviations and require owners to produce necessary documentation.
There are two side to the insurance industry. To grow profits they must aquire policyhoders. If policy owners lose faith in a company or begin to believe that insurers are not delivering on their promise they will lose policyholders. When insurers forget this premise they don’t have to worry about payouts because they will not have any customers.
Unfortunately it is an adjuster who has to bring people back to the reality that while the landscaping cost a fortune it was only covered up to the policy limits. By doing thisw they are able to provide a far greater net value to all of their constituents. It is a utilitarian principal. Greatest good for greatest number of people. Not perfect but all we got.
October 25, 2007 at 9:44 PM #91964RaybyrnesParticipant“You can’t deny that a key goal of every insurance company during a disaster is to minimize payouts.”
The goal of all organizations is to maximise profitability and return value to shareholders.
This means adhering to sound underwriting practices that reduce their exposure on the front end. By collecting enough premiums insurance companies are able to provide long term peice of mind and get policy owners back to where they were before.
To accomplish this means that they often times having to deny claims that fall outside standard deviations and require owners to produce necessary documentation.
There are two side to the insurance industry. To grow profits they must aquire policyhoders. If policy owners lose faith in a company or begin to believe that insurers are not delivering on their promise they will lose policyholders. When insurers forget this premise they don’t have to worry about payouts because they will not have any customers.
Unfortunately it is an adjuster who has to bring people back to the reality that while the landscaping cost a fortune it was only covered up to the policy limits. By doing thisw they are able to provide a far greater net value to all of their constituents. It is a utilitarian principal. Greatest good for greatest number of people. Not perfect but all we got.
October 25, 2007 at 9:51 PM #91966CarlsbadMtnBikerParticipantSome very good points by Raybyrnes on the fraud issue.
Difficult to gauge but some experts say up to 15-20% of P&C indemnity dollars paid, are on straight fraud or the more common “padded” type claims (legitimate loss but inflated by fraud.) Of course, we all pay for this, as it is built into the actuarial calculations.
I am sorry to hear of your property loss on the Brazil trip Raybyrnes. Most would have simply claimed theft to get the coverage but you obviously have more integrity than that. I plan on going to Chile on a snowboarding trip next summer, so this is a valuable tip for me. I’ll have to make sure I get good travel insurance if available.
Do not under estimate the value of insurance. The general rule of thumb is that it should coverall all major tangible assets and your liability coverage should be equal or greater than your overall personal net worth.
I did not want this thread to become a debate about how good or bad insurance companies are, but wanted this to remain focused on general tips for those that are now dealing with their insurance companies for maybe the first time in their lives. I was hoping for more relevant and useful info, especially from the industry insiders.
Our fellow San Diegans who have lost everything need to make careful choices and know all the benefits they have coming to them. I think that insurance companies are more likely to overlook benefits not claimed but available and due to their customers, than to “systematically” reduce their payouts.
Here is a relevant article published in TIME “this week,” since we are still in cut and paste mode.
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1675261,00.html?xid=feed-cnn-nation
Stay safe out there.
-CMB
October 25, 2007 at 9:51 PM #91995CarlsbadMtnBikerParticipantSome very good points by Raybyrnes on the fraud issue.
Difficult to gauge but some experts say up to 15-20% of P&C indemnity dollars paid, are on straight fraud or the more common “padded” type claims (legitimate loss but inflated by fraud.) Of course, we all pay for this, as it is built into the actuarial calculations.
I am sorry to hear of your property loss on the Brazil trip Raybyrnes. Most would have simply claimed theft to get the coverage but you obviously have more integrity than that. I plan on going to Chile on a snowboarding trip next summer, so this is a valuable tip for me. I’ll have to make sure I get good travel insurance if available.
Do not under estimate the value of insurance. The general rule of thumb is that it should coverall all major tangible assets and your liability coverage should be equal or greater than your overall personal net worth.
I did not want this thread to become a debate about how good or bad insurance companies are, but wanted this to remain focused on general tips for those that are now dealing with their insurance companies for maybe the first time in their lives. I was hoping for more relevant and useful info, especially from the industry insiders.
Our fellow San Diegans who have lost everything need to make careful choices and know all the benefits they have coming to them. I think that insurance companies are more likely to overlook benefits not claimed but available and due to their customers, than to “systematically” reduce their payouts.
Here is a relevant article published in TIME “this week,” since we are still in cut and paste mode.
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1675261,00.html?xid=feed-cnn-nation
Stay safe out there.
-CMB
October 25, 2007 at 9:51 PM #92006CarlsbadMtnBikerParticipantSome very good points by Raybyrnes on the fraud issue.
Difficult to gauge but some experts say up to 15-20% of P&C indemnity dollars paid, are on straight fraud or the more common “padded” type claims (legitimate loss but inflated by fraud.) Of course, we all pay for this, as it is built into the actuarial calculations.
I am sorry to hear of your property loss on the Brazil trip Raybyrnes. Most would have simply claimed theft to get the coverage but you obviously have more integrity than that. I plan on going to Chile on a snowboarding trip next summer, so this is a valuable tip for me. I’ll have to make sure I get good travel insurance if available.
Do not under estimate the value of insurance. The general rule of thumb is that it should coverall all major tangible assets and your liability coverage should be equal or greater than your overall personal net worth.
I did not want this thread to become a debate about how good or bad insurance companies are, but wanted this to remain focused on general tips for those that are now dealing with their insurance companies for maybe the first time in their lives. I was hoping for more relevant and useful info, especially from the industry insiders.
Our fellow San Diegans who have lost everything need to make careful choices and know all the benefits they have coming to them. I think that insurance companies are more likely to overlook benefits not claimed but available and due to their customers, than to “systematically” reduce their payouts.
Here is a relevant article published in TIME “this week,” since we are still in cut and paste mode.
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1675261,00.html?xid=feed-cnn-nation
Stay safe out there.
-CMB
October 25, 2007 at 9:54 PM #91998RaybyrnesParticipantCarlsbadMtnBiker
Tip for you. Pay for you ticket on American Express and contact them about the travel insurance. Think that it is fairly reasonable when compared to buying it at the airport. Especially if your gear is expensive.
For others on the board who have made recent purchases and have lsot their gear. Start checking your credit card policies to see if they might cover some of your losses.
I helped a friend move on sunday and question why he would pay cash for a Flat screen TV as opposed to using his credit card. I asked jokingly at the time if he ever considered the fact that with the credit card his NEW TV would be covered in the event his place burned down. He thought about thatfor aminute. Wonder what he would do if he was in that same situation again.
October 25, 2007 at 9:54 PM #92009RaybyrnesParticipantCarlsbadMtnBiker
Tip for you. Pay for you ticket on American Express and contact them about the travel insurance. Think that it is fairly reasonable when compared to buying it at the airport. Especially if your gear is expensive.
For others on the board who have made recent purchases and have lsot their gear. Start checking your credit card policies to see if they might cover some of your losses.
I helped a friend move on sunday and question why he would pay cash for a Flat screen TV as opposed to using his credit card. I asked jokingly at the time if he ever considered the fact that with the credit card his NEW TV would be covered in the event his place burned down. He thought about thatfor aminute. Wonder what he would do if he was in that same situation again.
October 25, 2007 at 9:54 PM #91969RaybyrnesParticipantCarlsbadMtnBiker
Tip for you. Pay for you ticket on American Express and contact them about the travel insurance. Think that it is fairly reasonable when compared to buying it at the airport. Especially if your gear is expensive.
For others on the board who have made recent purchases and have lsot their gear. Start checking your credit card policies to see if they might cover some of your losses.
I helped a friend move on sunday and question why he would pay cash for a Flat screen TV as opposed to using his credit card. I asked jokingly at the time if he ever considered the fact that with the credit card his NEW TV would be covered in the event his place burned down. He thought about thatfor aminute. Wonder what he would do if he was in that same situation again.
June 25, 2010 at 5:13 AM #571385BubblesitterParticipantResurrecting an old thread, as we start to approach fire season in San Diego in next few months.
Good heated discussion. CarlsbadMtnBiker is a good guy.
Only point is……
MAKE SURE YOU ARE ADEQUATELY COVERED. REVIEW YOUR POLICIES. YOU ARE YOUR OWN BEST ADVOCATE.
Bubblesitter
June 25, 2010 at 5:13 AM #572301BubblesitterParticipantResurrecting an old thread, as we start to approach fire season in San Diego in next few months.
Good heated discussion. CarlsbadMtnBiker is a good guy.
Only point is……
MAKE SURE YOU ARE ADEQUATELY COVERED. REVIEW YOUR POLICIES. YOU ARE YOUR OWN BEST ADVOCATE.
Bubblesitter
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.