Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Inflation everywhere?
- This topic has 390 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 10 months ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 28, 2011 at 5:23 PM #660390January 28, 2011 at 5:27 PM #659262SK in CVParticipant
[quote=pri_dk][quote=briansd1]My dad tells me that in the 1950s they didn’t eat the large steaks that we eat now. There were no double-doubles and the Big Mac was not yet invented.[/quote]
Uh-uh! Same menu since 1948!
Perhaps the double-double should be the standard measure for inflation?[/quote]
I was just thinking about that. I can’t tell you what a double-double cost back then, but I can tell you that a Big Mac meal cost me a buck in 1973, when I was in high school. Don’t eat McDonals very often these days, but I think the last time I had a big mac meal it was just under $7.00. And I’m pretty sure they were bigger 38 years ago. I think maybe the drinks and fries are bigger now.
That’s 600% inflation. According to an inflation calculator i found online, the increase in CPI over that same period 408.65%
January 28, 2011 at 5:27 PM #659325SK in CVParticipant[quote=pri_dk][quote=briansd1]My dad tells me that in the 1950s they didn’t eat the large steaks that we eat now. There were no double-doubles and the Big Mac was not yet invented.[/quote]
Uh-uh! Same menu since 1948!
Perhaps the double-double should be the standard measure for inflation?[/quote]
I was just thinking about that. I can’t tell you what a double-double cost back then, but I can tell you that a Big Mac meal cost me a buck in 1973, when I was in high school. Don’t eat McDonals very often these days, but I think the last time I had a big mac meal it was just under $7.00. And I’m pretty sure they were bigger 38 years ago. I think maybe the drinks and fries are bigger now.
That’s 600% inflation. According to an inflation calculator i found online, the increase in CPI over that same period 408.65%
January 28, 2011 at 5:27 PM #659928SK in CVParticipant[quote=pri_dk][quote=briansd1]My dad tells me that in the 1950s they didn’t eat the large steaks that we eat now. There were no double-doubles and the Big Mac was not yet invented.[/quote]
Uh-uh! Same menu since 1948!
Perhaps the double-double should be the standard measure for inflation?[/quote]
I was just thinking about that. I can’t tell you what a double-double cost back then, but I can tell you that a Big Mac meal cost me a buck in 1973, when I was in high school. Don’t eat McDonals very often these days, but I think the last time I had a big mac meal it was just under $7.00. And I’m pretty sure they were bigger 38 years ago. I think maybe the drinks and fries are bigger now.
That’s 600% inflation. According to an inflation calculator i found online, the increase in CPI over that same period 408.65%
January 28, 2011 at 5:27 PM #660066SK in CVParticipant[quote=pri_dk][quote=briansd1]My dad tells me that in the 1950s they didn’t eat the large steaks that we eat now. There were no double-doubles and the Big Mac was not yet invented.[/quote]
Uh-uh! Same menu since 1948!
Perhaps the double-double should be the standard measure for inflation?[/quote]
I was just thinking about that. I can’t tell you what a double-double cost back then, but I can tell you that a Big Mac meal cost me a buck in 1973, when I was in high school. Don’t eat McDonals very often these days, but I think the last time I had a big mac meal it was just under $7.00. And I’m pretty sure they were bigger 38 years ago. I think maybe the drinks and fries are bigger now.
That’s 600% inflation. According to an inflation calculator i found online, the increase in CPI over that same period 408.65%
January 28, 2011 at 5:27 PM #660395SK in CVParticipant[quote=pri_dk][quote=briansd1]My dad tells me that in the 1950s they didn’t eat the large steaks that we eat now. There were no double-doubles and the Big Mac was not yet invented.[/quote]
Uh-uh! Same menu since 1948!
Perhaps the double-double should be the standard measure for inflation?[/quote]
I was just thinking about that. I can’t tell you what a double-double cost back then, but I can tell you that a Big Mac meal cost me a buck in 1973, when I was in high school. Don’t eat McDonals very often these days, but I think the last time I had a big mac meal it was just under $7.00. And I’m pretty sure they were bigger 38 years ago. I think maybe the drinks and fries are bigger now.
That’s 600% inflation. According to an inflation calculator i found online, the increase in CPI over that same period 408.65%
January 28, 2011 at 6:31 PM #659287RealityParticipant[quote=briansd1]
And she’s going on 90yo and still in excellent health. Her health care cost to society is less than $500/year (she sees the doctor only once a year and sometimes she skips a year), but she contributes much more than that in Medicare premiums.
[/quote]If she’s in a Medicare Advantage HMO she’s costing taxpayers way more than $500/year. The HMO is reaping the benefit.
January 28, 2011 at 6:31 PM #659350RealityParticipant[quote=briansd1]
And she’s going on 90yo and still in excellent health. Her health care cost to society is less than $500/year (she sees the doctor only once a year and sometimes she skips a year), but she contributes much more than that in Medicare premiums.
[/quote]If she’s in a Medicare Advantage HMO she’s costing taxpayers way more than $500/year. The HMO is reaping the benefit.
January 28, 2011 at 6:31 PM #659953RealityParticipant[quote=briansd1]
And she’s going on 90yo and still in excellent health. Her health care cost to society is less than $500/year (she sees the doctor only once a year and sometimes she skips a year), but she contributes much more than that in Medicare premiums.
[/quote]If she’s in a Medicare Advantage HMO she’s costing taxpayers way more than $500/year. The HMO is reaping the benefit.
January 28, 2011 at 6:31 PM #660091RealityParticipant[quote=briansd1]
And she’s going on 90yo and still in excellent health. Her health care cost to society is less than $500/year (she sees the doctor only once a year and sometimes she skips a year), but she contributes much more than that in Medicare premiums.
[/quote]If she’s in a Medicare Advantage HMO she’s costing taxpayers way more than $500/year. The HMO is reaping the benefit.
January 28, 2011 at 6:31 PM #660420RealityParticipant[quote=briansd1]
And she’s going on 90yo and still in excellent health. Her health care cost to society is less than $500/year (she sees the doctor only once a year and sometimes she skips a year), but she contributes much more than that in Medicare premiums.
[/quote]If she’s in a Medicare Advantage HMO she’s costing taxpayers way more than $500/year. The HMO is reaping the benefit.
January 28, 2011 at 6:31 PM #659292CA renterParticipant[quote=teaboy][quote=threadkiller] One silver lining I guess to the inflation issue is my mortgage will definitely seem like less in a fairly short time period. Since it is my largest monthly cost I guess that is a good thing.[/quote]
I think that would only be true if there was wage inflation at least as large as the inflation in the cost of goods and services. I dont feel this is the case currently.
tb[/quote]
Exactly right, teaboy. They’ve managed to convince the masses that inflation is good, because people make the assumption that “wage inflation” is part of “inflation.” That’s not necessarily true, and hasn’t been the case in the U.S. for a long time. Asset price/cost inflation, without corresponding wage inflation is the WORST thing that could happen to us, economically-speaking, IMHO.
January 28, 2011 at 6:31 PM #659355CA renterParticipant[quote=teaboy][quote=threadkiller] One silver lining I guess to the inflation issue is my mortgage will definitely seem like less in a fairly short time period. Since it is my largest monthly cost I guess that is a good thing.[/quote]
I think that would only be true if there was wage inflation at least as large as the inflation in the cost of goods and services. I dont feel this is the case currently.
tb[/quote]
Exactly right, teaboy. They’ve managed to convince the masses that inflation is good, because people make the assumption that “wage inflation” is part of “inflation.” That’s not necessarily true, and hasn’t been the case in the U.S. for a long time. Asset price/cost inflation, without corresponding wage inflation is the WORST thing that could happen to us, economically-speaking, IMHO.
January 28, 2011 at 6:31 PM #659958CA renterParticipant[quote=teaboy][quote=threadkiller] One silver lining I guess to the inflation issue is my mortgage will definitely seem like less in a fairly short time period. Since it is my largest monthly cost I guess that is a good thing.[/quote]
I think that would only be true if there was wage inflation at least as large as the inflation in the cost of goods and services. I dont feel this is the case currently.
tb[/quote]
Exactly right, teaboy. They’ve managed to convince the masses that inflation is good, because people make the assumption that “wage inflation” is part of “inflation.” That’s not necessarily true, and hasn’t been the case in the U.S. for a long time. Asset price/cost inflation, without corresponding wage inflation is the WORST thing that could happen to us, economically-speaking, IMHO.
January 28, 2011 at 6:31 PM #660096CA renterParticipant[quote=teaboy][quote=threadkiller] One silver lining I guess to the inflation issue is my mortgage will definitely seem like less in a fairly short time period. Since it is my largest monthly cost I guess that is a good thing.[/quote]
I think that would only be true if there was wage inflation at least as large as the inflation in the cost of goods and services. I dont feel this is the case currently.
tb[/quote]
Exactly right, teaboy. They’ve managed to convince the masses that inflation is good, because people make the assumption that “wage inflation” is part of “inflation.” That’s not necessarily true, and hasn’t been the case in the U.S. for a long time. Asset price/cost inflation, without corresponding wage inflation is the WORST thing that could happen to us, economically-speaking, IMHO.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.