Menu

Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › I think this just kinda belongs on here

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 91 total)
1 2 3 … 5 6 7
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 25, 2008 at 10:20 AM #194509
    Anonymous
    Guest

    “have to” versus “want to”.

    Being rich, today, means that you can pay out of of pocket for any conceivable medical problem without insurance, without seriously worrying about your standard of living.

    April 25, 2008 at 12:38 PM #194492
    bobby
    Participant

    Sandi, nothing is wrong with working. it’s just that is definition of being rich. Your point, while valid, is not pertinent to the topic at hand.

    April 25, 2008 at 12:38 PM #194523
    bobby
    Participant

    Sandi, nothing is wrong with working. it’s just that is definition of being rich. Your point, while valid, is not pertinent to the topic at hand.

    April 25, 2008 at 12:38 PM #194549
    bobby
    Participant

    Sandi, nothing is wrong with working. it’s just that is definition of being rich. Your point, while valid, is not pertinent to the topic at hand.

    April 25, 2008 at 12:38 PM #194566
    bobby
    Participant

    Sandi, nothing is wrong with working. it’s just that is definition of being rich. Your point, while valid, is not pertinent to the topic at hand.

    April 25, 2008 at 12:38 PM #194608
    bobby
    Participant

    Sandi, nothing is wrong with working. it’s just that is definition of being rich. Your point, while valid, is not pertinent to the topic at hand.

    April 25, 2008 at 1:44 PM #194543
    Sandi Egan
    Participant

    Sandi, nothing is wrong with working. it’s just that is definition of being rich.
    I don’t think there is an objective definition of the term, otherwise we wouldn’t have this discussion. My definition goes like this:
    I am well off if I can afford what I need.
    I am rich if I can afford what I want.

    My point is, if you want to quit your job but can’t afford to, you will not feel rich.

    April 25, 2008 at 1:44 PM #194628
    Sandi Egan
    Participant

    Sandi, nothing is wrong with working. it’s just that is definition of being rich.
    I don’t think there is an objective definition of the term, otherwise we wouldn’t have this discussion. My definition goes like this:
    I am well off if I can afford what I need.
    I am rich if I can afford what I want.

    My point is, if you want to quit your job but can’t afford to, you will not feel rich.

    April 25, 2008 at 1:44 PM #194586
    Sandi Egan
    Participant

    Sandi, nothing is wrong with working. it’s just that is definition of being rich.
    I don’t think there is an objective definition of the term, otherwise we wouldn’t have this discussion. My definition goes like this:
    I am well off if I can afford what I need.
    I am rich if I can afford what I want.

    My point is, if you want to quit your job but can’t afford to, you will not feel rich.

    April 25, 2008 at 1:44 PM #194569
    Sandi Egan
    Participant

    Sandi, nothing is wrong with working. it’s just that is definition of being rich.
    I don’t think there is an objective definition of the term, otherwise we wouldn’t have this discussion. My definition goes like this:
    I am well off if I can afford what I need.
    I am rich if I can afford what I want.

    My point is, if you want to quit your job but can’t afford to, you will not feel rich.

    April 25, 2008 at 1:44 PM #194512
    Sandi Egan
    Participant

    Sandi, nothing is wrong with working. it’s just that is definition of being rich.
    I don’t think there is an objective definition of the term, otherwise we wouldn’t have this discussion. My definition goes like this:
    I am well off if I can afford what I need.
    I am rich if I can afford what I want.

    My point is, if you want to quit your job but can’t afford to, you will not feel rich.

    April 29, 2008 at 4:47 PM #196246
    raptorduck
    Participant

    Interesting article on topic, generally.

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/04/29/BU6J10D6J9.DTL

    April 29, 2008 at 4:47 PM #196279
    raptorduck
    Participant

    Interesting article on topic, generally.

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/04/29/BU6J10D6J9.DTL

    April 29, 2008 at 4:47 PM #196302
    raptorduck
    Participant

    Interesting article on topic, generally.

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/04/29/BU6J10D6J9.DTL

    April 29, 2008 at 4:47 PM #196323
    raptorduck
    Participant

    Interesting article on topic, generally.

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/04/29/BU6J10D6J9.DTL

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 91 total)
1 2 3 … 5 6 7
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.