I have a bad feeling about 11/8

[Anonymous]

I already said: They found a bunch of stuff on a private computer. Tracing anything on anybody’s laptop back to deliberate, criminal action by Clinton would be nearly impossible. Maybe Huda had something she wasn’t supposed to have (Comey hasn’t even said that much) but the notion that it came from Clinton is purely speculation. Comey just handed one side a license to run with that speculation. And of course they are.

[quote]Can you imagine the shit storm if Comey didn’t CYA and then Congress or the Media learned there was Clinton emails on the Weiner computer?[/quote]

Comey’s job not to avoid media “shit storms.”

The FBI should investigate anybody and everybody they believe is involved in criminal activity. And they should STFU about what they are doing until they have something actionable. At this point in this shit storm – yes it’s already a shit storm – there should be no “news” coming from Comey and the Justice Department without anything less than an indictment. And they don’t have that because there is insufficient evidence of a crime.

All Comey has said is that “we haven’t found anything at all except another possible place to look.” Of course the Trump partisans will interpret that as a smoking gun. But it won’t affect the outcome on Nov 8.

PS: Elon Musk, WTF?

[Hobie]

Me thinks Huma’s computer and accounts would have all of the emails addressed to Hillery. Why, as Chief of Staff she would triage all of the incoming emails first. Can Huma claim the 5th too?

[outtamojo]

[quote=ucodegen] …

This is one weird election. I propose another scenario: Hillary wins, gets outed via Wikileaks, impeached, the VP then becomes pres…[/quote]

This scenario is still much more palatable to me than Trump outright winning. Winding down it would take news that Hillary was the secret head of a local KKK chapter for me not to vote for her.

[njtosd]

[quote=harvey] Of course the Trump partisans will interpret that as a smoking gun. But it won’t affect the outcome on Nov 8.

[/quote]

I wouldn’t be so sure of that. Logically, you may be right. Comey’s caught between an AG who has had allegations of bias and future allegations of a cover up.

Emotionally, though, this brings front and center a very distasteful potential crime by a close Clinton connection. And it also reinforces the notion that both Hillary and her closest aid have (a) willful blindness, (b) poor judgment or (c) something else when it comes to what would normally be considered one of the most important relationships in their lives. None of these things are qualities of great leaders. Before anyone else says it – the very SAME THING can be said for Trump. He’s hideous – no doubt. This new stuff just brings her collective baggage closer to his.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=njtosd] . . . Emotionally, though, this brings front and center a very distasteful potential crime by a close Clinton connection. And it also reinforces the notion that both Hillary and her closest aid have (a) willful blindness, (b) poor judgment or (c) something else when it comes to what would normally be considered one of the most important relationships in their lives . . .[/quote]That something else is an obvious codependency. Did Huma learn this behavior from her mentor, HRC, whom she has been attached to at the hip since she was an (impressionable) 19-20 years old? She had no shortage of very powerful executives as well as celebrities fawning all over her when she was a single up and coming politico! I can’t for the life of me understand what she saw in Weiner. But I digress ….

I note Huma isn’t traveling with HRC today. As it should be. She needs to go into hiding right now and schedule a “come to Jes*s convo” with her counsel in the coming week. The Clinton campaign can pay the retainer. She should also seek therapy asap on why she felt “trapped” into staying with “Mr. Danger” fully 5 years and 2 months past his “sell-by date” and have a baby with him in the interim, all the while being repeatedly humiliated by the relentless media fallout from his sordid “sexual phone forays.”

HRC well knew all of this and had to have known Huma was working at home and that her esteemed spouse, “Mr. Danger” was under investigation by the FBI over soliciting sexual favors from minors online and had seized his family’s computers and cell phones. Still …. she kept Huma on and didn’t bother to ask or see what State Dept matters might have been stored on her “right-hand woman’s” (now seized) computer or question her if she erased any of it before her computers were seized by the FBI. Huma was in charge of putting ALL of HRC’s e-mails into folders and/or moving them to other hard drives or the cloud. As such, HRC deserves all of the fallout she is getting. She is too careless with the safeguarding of US government e-mails, and as a byproduct, America’s secrets . . . yes, even at this late date. The buck stops with HER.

[SK in CV]

[quote=njtosd][quote=harvey] Of course the Trump partisans will interpret that as a smoking gun. But it won’t affect the outcome on Nov 8.

[/quote]

I wouldn’t be so sure of that. Logically, you may be right. Comey’s caught between an AG who has had allegations of bias and future allegations of a cover up.

Emotionally, though, this brings front and center a very distasteful potential crime by a close Clinton connection. And it also reinforces the notion that both Hillary and her closest aid have (a) willful blindness, (b) poor judgment or (c) something else when it comes to what would normally be considered one of the most important relationships in their lives. None of these things are qualities of great leaders. Before anyone else says it – the very SAME THING can be said for Trump. He’s hideous – no doubt. This new stuff just brings her collective baggage closer to his.[/quote]

What exactly do you think is the crime that’s been committed? Or even the “poor judgement “?

[SK in CV]

[quote=bearishgurl][quote=njtosd] . . . Emotionally, though, this brings front and center a very distasteful potential crime by a close Clinton connection. And it also reinforces the notion that both Hillary and her closest aid have (a) willful blindness, (b) poor judgment or (c) something else when it comes to what would normally be considered one of the most important relationships in their lives . . .[/quote]That something else is an obvious codependency. Did Huma learn this behavior from her mentor, HRC, whom she has been attached to at the hip since she was an (impressionable) 19-20 years old? She had no shortage of very powerful executives as well as celebrities fawning all over her when she was a single up and coming politico! I can’t for the life of me understand what she saw in Weiner. But I digress ….

I note Huma isn’t traveling with HRC today. As it should be. She needs to go into hiding right now and schedule a “come to Jes*s convo” with her counsel in the coming week. The Clinton campaign can pay the retainer. She should also seek therapy asap on why she felt “trapped” into staying with “Mr. Danger” fully 5 years and 2 months past his “sell-by date” and have a baby with him in the interim, all the while being repeatedly humiliated by the relentless media fallout from his sordid “sexual phone forays.”

HRC well knew all of this and had to have known Huma was working at home and that her esteemed spouse, “Mr. Danger” was under investigation by the FBI over soliciting sexual favors from minors online and had seized his family’s computers and cell phones. Still …. she kept Huma on and didn’t bother to ask or see what State Dept matters might have been stored on her “right-hand woman’s” (now seized) computer or question her if she erased any of it before her computers were seized by the FBI. Huma was in charge of putting ALL of HRC’s e-mails into folders and/or moving them to other hard drives or the cloud. As such, HRC deserves all of the fallout she is getting. She is too careless with the safeguarding of US government e-mails, and as a byproduct, America’s secrets . . . yes, even at this late date. The buck stops with HER.[/quote]

Wow. Make shit up much out of nothing? The obvious hate of successful people aside, you have zero evidence of any of the allegations you’ve made here.

[bearishgurl]

SK, you must know that the FBI would not have stated that they were “reopening” (I know you don’t like to call it that but it fits) HRC’s investigation into her e-mail server unless they found some damning evidence on Huma’s laptop or phone. Like it or not, HRC, Huma (and as byproducts) Anthony and Bill are all interconnected. Two of them have been very close for ~20 years and the 4 of them were like One Big Happy Family. Bill actually married Huma and Anthony in 2010.

When one routinely rolls in the mud with their friends and “partners,” they will eventually get someone else’s dirt all over themselves. That’s how it works.

[njtosd]

[quote=SK in CV][quote=njtosd][quote=harvey] Of course the Trump partisans will interpret that as a smoking gun. But it won’t affect the outcome on Nov 8.

[/quote]

I wouldn’t be so sure of that. Logically, you may be right. Comey’s caught between an AG who has had allegations of bias and future allegations of a cover up.

Emotionally, though, this brings front and center a very distasteful potential crime by a close Clinton connection. And it also reinforces the notion that both Hillary and her closest aid have (a) willful blindness, (b) poor judgment or (c) something else when it comes to what would normally be considered one of the most important relationships in their lives. None of these things are qualities of great leaders. Before anyone else says it – the very SAME THING can be said for Trump. He’s hideous – no doubt. This new stuff just brings her collective baggage closer to his.[/quote]

What exactly do you think is the crime that’s been committed? Or even the “poor judgement “?[/quote]

I said potential crime – sexting with a 15 year old and sending lewd images is a problem, which is the reason Weiner’s being investigated. Poor judgement – hmm. Let’s say this – I hope my daughters never even date people like Bill Clinton or Anthony Weiner.

[njtosd]

[quote=bearishgurl][quote=njtosd] . . . Emotionally, though, this brings front and center a very distasteful potential crime by a close Clinton connection. And it also reinforces the notion that both Hillary and her closest aid have (a) willful blindness, (b) poor judgment or (c) something else when it comes to what would normally be considered one of the most important relationships in their lives . . .[/quote]That something else is an obvious codependency. Did Huma learn this behavior from her mentor, HRC, whom she has been attached to at the hip since she was an (impressionable) 19-20 years old? She had no shortage of very powerful executives as well as celebrities fawning all over her when she was a single up and coming politico! I can’t for the life of me understand what she saw in Weiner. But I digress ….

I note Huma isn’t traveling with HRC today. As it should be. She needs to go into hiding right now and schedule a “come to Jes*s convo” with her counsel in the coming week. The Clinton campaign can pay the retainer. She should also seek therapy asap on why she felt “trapped” into staying with “Mr. Danger” fully 5 years and 2 months past his “sell-by date” and have a baby with him in the interim, all the while being repeatedly humiliated by the relentless media fallout from his sordid “sexual phone forays.”

HRC well knew all of this and had to have known Huma was working at home and that her esteemed spouse, “Mr. Danger” was under investigation by the FBI over soliciting sexual favors from minors online and had seized his family’s computers and cell phones. Still …. she kept Huma on and didn’t bother to ask or see what State Dept matters might have been stored on her “right-hand woman’s” (now seized) computer or question her if she erased any of it before her computers were seized by the FBI. Huma was in charge of putting ALL of HRC’s e-mails into folders and/or moving them to other hard drives or the cloud. As such, HRC deserves all of the fallout she is getting. She is too careless with the safeguarding of US government e-mails, and as a byproduct, America’s secrets . . . yes, even at this late date. The buck stops with HER.[/quote]

Once again, BG, you have misquoted me by adding emphasis where there was none. It really riles me – I have explained on a couple of occasions now in painfully clear terms that I resent your misrepresentations. So have other people. Stop it.

[SK in CV]

[quote=bearishgurl]SK, you must know that the FBI would not have stated that they were “reopening” (I know you don’t like to call it that but it fits) HRC’s investigation into her e-mail server unless they found some damning evidence on Huma’s laptop or phone. Like it or not, HRC, Huma (and as byproducts) Anthony and Bill are all interconnected. Two of them have been very close for ~20 years and the 4 of them were like One Big Happy Family. Bill actually married Huma and Anthony in 2010.

When one routinely rolls in the mud with their friends and “partners,” they will eventually get someone else’s dirt all over themselves. That’s how it works.[/quote]

The FBI didn’t say they were “reopening”, so no, it doesn’t fit. The FBI doesn’t close cases. They also said they don’t know what is in the emails. So if they don’t know, you can’t possibly even guess that they’re damning. More likely, it’s not the specific content of the emails, in fact, the FBI has acknowledged that all the emails they’re currently referring to (which may be as few as 3) could be emails they’ve already examined.

Weiner is a loser. Bill Clinton is one of the best past presidents the country has ever had. There is no evidence that Huma is anything but an outstanding employee and person. Secretary Clinton’s accomplishments speak for themselves. The dozens of scandals she’s been accused of are nothing more than empty accusations. So, I have no idea what “mud” you’re referring to. Based on your history here, best guess is you’re just making more shit up, so as to not look foolish again. Doesn’t really work very well.

[SK in CV]

[quote=njtosd]
I said potential crime – sexting with a 15 year old and sending lewd images is a problem, which is the reason Weiner’s being investigated. Poor judgement – hmm. Let’s say this – I hope my daughters never even date people like Bill Clinton or Anthony Weiner.[/quote]

So you’re saying that Secretary Clinton is “potentially” guilty of something because of something that Weiner did? She is guilty of poor judgment because someone who is married to her employee did something despicable? Really? Am I guilty of bad judgement because one of my high school buddies, and groomsman at my wedding, was later convicted of a crime and did time in a federal prison? Is my wife, who I married more than 30 year later, also guilty of bad judgement?

[mixxalot]

Hillary will steal the election and win even though Trump will win the popular vote. The global elites want their puppet to win.

[Anonymous]

If I’ve learned anything from these 2016 election discussions, it’s that some of Piggs are harboring some serious bitterness over their own past or present marriages.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=njtosd][quote=bearishgurl][quote=njtosd] . . . Emotionally, though, this brings front and center a very distasteful potential crime by a close Clinton connection. And it also reinforces the notion that both Hillary and her closest aid have (a) willful blindness, (b) poor judgment or (c) something else when it comes to what would normally be considered one of the most important relationships in their lives . . .[/quote]That something else is an obvious codependency. Did Huma learn this behavior from her mentor, HRC, whom she has been attached to at the hip since she was an (impressionable) 19-20 years old? She had no shortage of very powerful executives as well as celebrities fawning all over her when she was a single up and coming politico! I can’t for the life of me understand what she saw in Weiner. But I digress ….

I note Huma isn’t traveling with HRC today. As it should be. She needs to go into hiding right now and schedule a “come to Jes*s convo” with her counsel in the coming week. The Clinton campaign can pay the retainer. She should also seek therapy asap on why she felt “trapped” into staying with “Mr. Danger” fully 5 years and 2 months past his “sell-by date” and have a baby with him in the interim, all the while being repeatedly humiliated by the relentless media fallout from his sordid “sexual phone forays.”

HRC well knew all of this and had to have known Huma was working at home and that her esteemed spouse, “Mr. Danger” was under investigation by the FBI over soliciting sexual favors from minors online and had seized his family’s computers and cell phones. Still …. she kept Huma on and didn’t bother to ask or see what State Dept matters might have been stored on her “right-hand woman’s” (now seized) computer or question her if she erased any of it before her computers were seized by the FBI. Huma was in charge of putting ALL of HRC’s e-mails into folders and/or moving them to other hard drives or the cloud. As such, HRC deserves all of the fallout she is getting. She is too careless with the safeguarding of US government e-mails, and as a byproduct, America’s secrets . . . yes, even at this late date. The buck stops with HER.[/quote]

Once again, BG, you have misquoted me by adding emphasis where there was none. It really riles me – I have explained on a couple of occasions now in painfully clear terms that I resent your misrepresentations. So have other people. Stop it.[/quote]nj, you’re certainly free to tell the Piggs what you meant by this phrase you posted:

[quote=njtosd]…Emotionally, though, this brings front and center a very distasteful potential crime by a close Clinton connection. And it also reinforces the notion that both Hillary and her closest aid have (a) willful blindness, (b) poor judgment or (c) something else when it comes to what would normally be considered one of the most important relationships in their lives. …[/quote]

Instead of berating me for giving MY opinion, why don’t you give yours? What exactly did to mean by the [bolded] phrase?

[Author]

Posts