- This topic has 585 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 7 months ago by equalizer.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 11, 2011 at 1:13 PM #686528April 11, 2011 at 1:16 PM #685372scaredyclassicParticipant
I think I shouldve got down to 417. I was too afraid at the time to let go of money. Thinking about earthquakes. Assuming you stay there and things are normal and you invest as stupidly as me in your retirement accts I think it’s better to get down to 417.
April 11, 2011 at 1:16 PM #685423scaredyclassicParticipantI think I shouldve got down to 417. I was too afraid at the time to let go of money. Thinking about earthquakes. Assuming you stay there and things are normal and you invest as stupidly as me in your retirement accts I think it’s better to get down to 417.
April 11, 2011 at 1:16 PM #686049scaredyclassicParticipantI think I shouldve got down to 417. I was too afraid at the time to let go of money. Thinking about earthquakes. Assuming you stay there and things are normal and you invest as stupidly as me in your retirement accts I think it’s better to get down to 417.
April 11, 2011 at 1:16 PM #686191scaredyclassicParticipantI think I shouldve got down to 417. I was too afraid at the time to let go of money. Thinking about earthquakes. Assuming you stay there and things are normal and you invest as stupidly as me in your retirement accts I think it’s better to get down to 417.
April 11, 2011 at 1:16 PM #686543scaredyclassicParticipantI think I shouldve got down to 417. I was too afraid at the time to let go of money. Thinking about earthquakes. Assuming you stay there and things are normal and you invest as stupidly as me in your retirement accts I think it’s better to get down to 417.
April 11, 2011 at 1:42 PM #685382UCguyParticipantLOL, scaredy, you have a point. We don’t really know how to invest for our retirement accts either, LOL. We have little control over 401Ks, and the return has been very bad recently (but then, so was a lot of the economy).
April 11, 2011 at 1:42 PM #685433UCguyParticipantLOL, scaredy, you have a point. We don’t really know how to invest for our retirement accts either, LOL. We have little control over 401Ks, and the return has been very bad recently (but then, so was a lot of the economy).
April 11, 2011 at 1:42 PM #686059UCguyParticipantLOL, scaredy, you have a point. We don’t really know how to invest for our retirement accts either, LOL. We have little control over 401Ks, and the return has been very bad recently (but then, so was a lot of the economy).
April 11, 2011 at 1:42 PM #686201UCguyParticipantLOL, scaredy, you have a point. We don’t really know how to invest for our retirement accts either, LOL. We have little control over 401Ks, and the return has been very bad recently (but then, so was a lot of the economy).
April 11, 2011 at 1:42 PM #686553UCguyParticipantLOL, scaredy, you have a point. We don’t really know how to invest for our retirement accts either, LOL. We have little control over 401Ks, and the return has been very bad recently (but then, so was a lot of the economy).
April 11, 2011 at 2:06 PM #685397sdrealtorParticipantThe differential between rates at 417 and below the 697K are not that much these days. Waiting a year or two to get under 417K for the sake of rates is probably a loser of a bet to make and I wouldnt.
Where it gets trickier is in the qualifying. With great debt to income ratios and $15K/month w-2 income that should not be an issue.
With that kind of income, the tax benefit to your will be very high. Think somewhere close to $1,000/month. So your net housing expense will be closer to $2600/month once the 401K loan is repaid.
I’ll further assume you arent renting a 4BR 2,000 sq ft single family home with guaranteed fixed rent for the next 10 to 20 years at $1500/month.
If you can find something you like, you should be fine barring an extended major income crisis.
FWIW, I have a 4BR lisitng in escrow just under 2000 sq ft in fine condition built after 1990 with No Mello Roos or HOA in Scripps Ranch on a quiet cul de sac street. Its in escrow just over $500K. Find yourself something like that. They are out there for the taking.
April 11, 2011 at 2:06 PM #685448sdrealtorParticipantThe differential between rates at 417 and below the 697K are not that much these days. Waiting a year or two to get under 417K for the sake of rates is probably a loser of a bet to make and I wouldnt.
Where it gets trickier is in the qualifying. With great debt to income ratios and $15K/month w-2 income that should not be an issue.
With that kind of income, the tax benefit to your will be very high. Think somewhere close to $1,000/month. So your net housing expense will be closer to $2600/month once the 401K loan is repaid.
I’ll further assume you arent renting a 4BR 2,000 sq ft single family home with guaranteed fixed rent for the next 10 to 20 years at $1500/month.
If you can find something you like, you should be fine barring an extended major income crisis.
FWIW, I have a 4BR lisitng in escrow just under 2000 sq ft in fine condition built after 1990 with No Mello Roos or HOA in Scripps Ranch on a quiet cul de sac street. Its in escrow just over $500K. Find yourself something like that. They are out there for the taking.
April 11, 2011 at 2:06 PM #686075sdrealtorParticipantThe differential between rates at 417 and below the 697K are not that much these days. Waiting a year or two to get under 417K for the sake of rates is probably a loser of a bet to make and I wouldnt.
Where it gets trickier is in the qualifying. With great debt to income ratios and $15K/month w-2 income that should not be an issue.
With that kind of income, the tax benefit to your will be very high. Think somewhere close to $1,000/month. So your net housing expense will be closer to $2600/month once the 401K loan is repaid.
I’ll further assume you arent renting a 4BR 2,000 sq ft single family home with guaranteed fixed rent for the next 10 to 20 years at $1500/month.
If you can find something you like, you should be fine barring an extended major income crisis.
FWIW, I have a 4BR lisitng in escrow just under 2000 sq ft in fine condition built after 1990 with No Mello Roos or HOA in Scripps Ranch on a quiet cul de sac street. Its in escrow just over $500K. Find yourself something like that. They are out there for the taking.
April 11, 2011 at 2:06 PM #686216sdrealtorParticipantThe differential between rates at 417 and below the 697K are not that much these days. Waiting a year or two to get under 417K for the sake of rates is probably a loser of a bet to make and I wouldnt.
Where it gets trickier is in the qualifying. With great debt to income ratios and $15K/month w-2 income that should not be an issue.
With that kind of income, the tax benefit to your will be very high. Think somewhere close to $1,000/month. So your net housing expense will be closer to $2600/month once the 401K loan is repaid.
I’ll further assume you arent renting a 4BR 2,000 sq ft single family home with guaranteed fixed rent for the next 10 to 20 years at $1500/month.
If you can find something you like, you should be fine barring an extended major income crisis.
FWIW, I have a 4BR lisitng in escrow just under 2000 sq ft in fine condition built after 1990 with No Mello Roos or HOA in Scripps Ranch on a quiet cul de sac street. Its in escrow just over $500K. Find yourself something like that. They are out there for the taking.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.