- This topic has 220 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 10 months ago by jpinpb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 15, 2009 at 1:17 PM #347254February 15, 2009 at 1:44 PM #346702patientrenterParticipant
I missed this show. (I don’t have a TV.) Did they cover the role of Congress and FNMA and FHA and Freddie…? The Congressmen who pushed banks and regulators to shovel more money at housing are riding higher than ever before, and are probably too powerful to be fully exposed.
February 15, 2009 at 1:44 PM #347023patientrenterParticipantI missed this show. (I don’t have a TV.) Did they cover the role of Congress and FNMA and FHA and Freddie…? The Congressmen who pushed banks and regulators to shovel more money at housing are riding higher than ever before, and are probably too powerful to be fully exposed.
February 15, 2009 at 1:44 PM #347136patientrenterParticipantI missed this show. (I don’t have a TV.) Did they cover the role of Congress and FNMA and FHA and Freddie…? The Congressmen who pushed banks and regulators to shovel more money at housing are riding higher than ever before, and are probably too powerful to be fully exposed.
February 15, 2009 at 1:44 PM #347170patientrenterParticipantI missed this show. (I don’t have a TV.) Did they cover the role of Congress and FNMA and FHA and Freddie…? The Congressmen who pushed banks and regulators to shovel more money at housing are riding higher than ever before, and are probably too powerful to be fully exposed.
February 15, 2009 at 1:44 PM #347269patientrenterParticipantI missed this show. (I don’t have a TV.) Did they cover the role of Congress and FNMA and FHA and Freddie…? The Congressmen who pushed banks and regulators to shovel more money at housing are riding higher than ever before, and are probably too powerful to be fully exposed.
February 15, 2009 at 5:41 PM #346847jpinpbParticipantSHOW TIMES
Saturday, February 14th 7p | 10p ET
Sunday, February 15th 9p ET
Monday, February 16th 8p | 12a ET
Sunday, March 1st Midnight ET
Sunday, March 15th 9p ETFebruary 15, 2009 at 5:41 PM #347168jpinpbParticipantSHOW TIMES
Saturday, February 14th 7p | 10p ET
Sunday, February 15th 9p ET
Monday, February 16th 8p | 12a ET
Sunday, March 1st Midnight ET
Sunday, March 15th 9p ETFebruary 15, 2009 at 5:41 PM #347281jpinpbParticipantSHOW TIMES
Saturday, February 14th 7p | 10p ET
Sunday, February 15th 9p ET
Monday, February 16th 8p | 12a ET
Sunday, March 1st Midnight ET
Sunday, March 15th 9p ETFebruary 15, 2009 at 5:41 PM #347315jpinpbParticipantSHOW TIMES
Saturday, February 14th 7p | 10p ET
Sunday, February 15th 9p ET
Monday, February 16th 8p | 12a ET
Sunday, March 1st Midnight ET
Sunday, March 15th 9p ETFebruary 15, 2009 at 5:41 PM #347414jpinpbParticipantSHOW TIMES
Saturday, February 14th 7p | 10p ET
Sunday, February 15th 9p ET
Monday, February 16th 8p | 12a ET
Sunday, March 1st Midnight ET
Sunday, March 15th 9p ETFebruary 15, 2009 at 6:58 PM #346872jpinpbParticipant[quote=thebazman]As it turns out, the whole “house of cards” collapsed anyway, so the end result was the same, just delayed. Maybe if someone had stepped in sooner the total number of people affected would have been less?
[/quote]All they’re doing now is the same thing, delaying and procrastinating the inevitable. No one wants the disasterous consequences on their watch.
February 15, 2009 at 6:58 PM #347193jpinpbParticipant[quote=thebazman]As it turns out, the whole “house of cards” collapsed anyway, so the end result was the same, just delayed. Maybe if someone had stepped in sooner the total number of people affected would have been less?
[/quote]All they’re doing now is the same thing, delaying and procrastinating the inevitable. No one wants the disasterous consequences on their watch.
February 15, 2009 at 6:58 PM #347306jpinpbParticipant[quote=thebazman]As it turns out, the whole “house of cards” collapsed anyway, so the end result was the same, just delayed. Maybe if someone had stepped in sooner the total number of people affected would have been less?
[/quote]All they’re doing now is the same thing, delaying and procrastinating the inevitable. No one wants the disasterous consequences on their watch.
February 15, 2009 at 6:58 PM #347340jpinpbParticipant[quote=thebazman]As it turns out, the whole “house of cards” collapsed anyway, so the end result was the same, just delayed. Maybe if someone had stepped in sooner the total number of people affected would have been less?
[/quote]All they’re doing now is the same thing, delaying and procrastinating the inevitable. No one wants the disasterous consequences on their watch.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.