- This topic has 220 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by
jpinpb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 15, 2009 at 1:17 PM #347254February 15, 2009 at 1:44 PM #346702
patientrenter
ParticipantI missed this show. (I don’t have a TV.) Did they cover the role of Congress and FNMA and FHA and Freddie…? The Congressmen who pushed banks and regulators to shovel more money at housing are riding higher than ever before, and are probably too powerful to be fully exposed.
February 15, 2009 at 1:44 PM #347023patientrenter
ParticipantI missed this show. (I don’t have a TV.) Did they cover the role of Congress and FNMA and FHA and Freddie…? The Congressmen who pushed banks and regulators to shovel more money at housing are riding higher than ever before, and are probably too powerful to be fully exposed.
February 15, 2009 at 1:44 PM #347136patientrenter
ParticipantI missed this show. (I don’t have a TV.) Did they cover the role of Congress and FNMA and FHA and Freddie…? The Congressmen who pushed banks and regulators to shovel more money at housing are riding higher than ever before, and are probably too powerful to be fully exposed.
February 15, 2009 at 1:44 PM #347170patientrenter
ParticipantI missed this show. (I don’t have a TV.) Did they cover the role of Congress and FNMA and FHA and Freddie…? The Congressmen who pushed banks and regulators to shovel more money at housing are riding higher than ever before, and are probably too powerful to be fully exposed.
February 15, 2009 at 1:44 PM #347269patientrenter
ParticipantI missed this show. (I don’t have a TV.) Did they cover the role of Congress and FNMA and FHA and Freddie…? The Congressmen who pushed banks and regulators to shovel more money at housing are riding higher than ever before, and are probably too powerful to be fully exposed.
February 15, 2009 at 5:41 PM #346847jpinpb
ParticipantSHOW TIMES
Saturday, February 14th 7p | 10p ET
Sunday, February 15th 9p ET
Monday, February 16th 8p | 12a ET
Sunday, March 1st Midnight ET
Sunday, March 15th 9p ETFebruary 15, 2009 at 5:41 PM #347168jpinpb
ParticipantSHOW TIMES
Saturday, February 14th 7p | 10p ET
Sunday, February 15th 9p ET
Monday, February 16th 8p | 12a ET
Sunday, March 1st Midnight ET
Sunday, March 15th 9p ETFebruary 15, 2009 at 5:41 PM #347281jpinpb
ParticipantSHOW TIMES
Saturday, February 14th 7p | 10p ET
Sunday, February 15th 9p ET
Monday, February 16th 8p | 12a ET
Sunday, March 1st Midnight ET
Sunday, March 15th 9p ETFebruary 15, 2009 at 5:41 PM #347315jpinpb
ParticipantSHOW TIMES
Saturday, February 14th 7p | 10p ET
Sunday, February 15th 9p ET
Monday, February 16th 8p | 12a ET
Sunday, March 1st Midnight ET
Sunday, March 15th 9p ETFebruary 15, 2009 at 5:41 PM #347414jpinpb
ParticipantSHOW TIMES
Saturday, February 14th 7p | 10p ET
Sunday, February 15th 9p ET
Monday, February 16th 8p | 12a ET
Sunday, March 1st Midnight ET
Sunday, March 15th 9p ETFebruary 15, 2009 at 6:58 PM #346872jpinpb
Participant[quote=thebazman]As it turns out, the whole “house of cards” collapsed anyway, so the end result was the same, just delayed. Maybe if someone had stepped in sooner the total number of people affected would have been less?
[/quote]All they’re doing now is the same thing, delaying and procrastinating the inevitable. No one wants the disasterous consequences on their watch.
February 15, 2009 at 6:58 PM #347193jpinpb
Participant[quote=thebazman]As it turns out, the whole “house of cards” collapsed anyway, so the end result was the same, just delayed. Maybe if someone had stepped in sooner the total number of people affected would have been less?
[/quote]All they’re doing now is the same thing, delaying and procrastinating the inevitable. No one wants the disasterous consequences on their watch.
February 15, 2009 at 6:58 PM #347306jpinpb
Participant[quote=thebazman]As it turns out, the whole “house of cards” collapsed anyway, so the end result was the same, just delayed. Maybe if someone had stepped in sooner the total number of people affected would have been less?
[/quote]All they’re doing now is the same thing, delaying and procrastinating the inevitable. No one wants the disasterous consequences on their watch.
February 15, 2009 at 6:58 PM #347340jpinpb
Participant[quote=thebazman]As it turns out, the whole “house of cards” collapsed anyway, so the end result was the same, just delayed. Maybe if someone had stepped in sooner the total number of people affected would have been less?
[/quote]All they’re doing now is the same thing, delaying and procrastinating the inevitable. No one wants the disasterous consequences on their watch.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.