- This topic has 220 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 10 months ago by jpinpb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 16, 2009 at 5:58 PM #347984February 16, 2009 at 6:10 PM #347420patientrenterParticipant
[quote=UCGal][quote=patientrenter]I missed this show. (I don’t have a TV.) Did they cover the role of Congress and FNMA and FHA and Freddie…? The Congressmen who pushed banks and regulators to shovel more money at housing are riding higher than ever before, and are probably too powerful to be fully exposed.[/quote]
They talked about Fannie and Freddie – but also pointed out that the real escalation of all this came when mortgages were bundled on wall street as MBSs and CDOs. Subprime, alt-a, etc. (Vs the GSE mortgages). I got the impression that having wallstreet willing to buy every mortgage made to securitize it and sell it was more a factor than fanny and freddie.
But maybe I misunderstood.
[/quote]Thanks, UCGal. Sounds like Congress got a free pass in this documentary. I kinda suspected that, since Barney Frank and Chris Dodd and Chuck Schumer now hold the reins of power more than ever, and someone would lose out if they were crossed by a bunch of TV producers.
February 16, 2009 at 6:10 PM #347741patientrenterParticipant[quote=UCGal][quote=patientrenter]I missed this show. (I don’t have a TV.) Did they cover the role of Congress and FNMA and FHA and Freddie…? The Congressmen who pushed banks and regulators to shovel more money at housing are riding higher than ever before, and are probably too powerful to be fully exposed.[/quote]
They talked about Fannie and Freddie – but also pointed out that the real escalation of all this came when mortgages were bundled on wall street as MBSs and CDOs. Subprime, alt-a, etc. (Vs the GSE mortgages). I got the impression that having wallstreet willing to buy every mortgage made to securitize it and sell it was more a factor than fanny and freddie.
But maybe I misunderstood.
[/quote]Thanks, UCGal. Sounds like Congress got a free pass in this documentary. I kinda suspected that, since Barney Frank and Chris Dodd and Chuck Schumer now hold the reins of power more than ever, and someone would lose out if they were crossed by a bunch of TV producers.
February 16, 2009 at 6:10 PM #347858patientrenterParticipant[quote=UCGal][quote=patientrenter]I missed this show. (I don’t have a TV.) Did they cover the role of Congress and FNMA and FHA and Freddie…? The Congressmen who pushed banks and regulators to shovel more money at housing are riding higher than ever before, and are probably too powerful to be fully exposed.[/quote]
They talked about Fannie and Freddie – but also pointed out that the real escalation of all this came when mortgages were bundled on wall street as MBSs and CDOs. Subprime, alt-a, etc. (Vs the GSE mortgages). I got the impression that having wallstreet willing to buy every mortgage made to securitize it and sell it was more a factor than fanny and freddie.
But maybe I misunderstood.
[/quote]Thanks, UCGal. Sounds like Congress got a free pass in this documentary. I kinda suspected that, since Barney Frank and Chris Dodd and Chuck Schumer now hold the reins of power more than ever, and someone would lose out if they were crossed by a bunch of TV producers.
February 16, 2009 at 6:10 PM #347889patientrenterParticipant[quote=UCGal][quote=patientrenter]I missed this show. (I don’t have a TV.) Did they cover the role of Congress and FNMA and FHA and Freddie…? The Congressmen who pushed banks and regulators to shovel more money at housing are riding higher than ever before, and are probably too powerful to be fully exposed.[/quote]
They talked about Fannie and Freddie – but also pointed out that the real escalation of all this came when mortgages were bundled on wall street as MBSs and CDOs. Subprime, alt-a, etc. (Vs the GSE mortgages). I got the impression that having wallstreet willing to buy every mortgage made to securitize it and sell it was more a factor than fanny and freddie.
But maybe I misunderstood.
[/quote]Thanks, UCGal. Sounds like Congress got a free pass in this documentary. I kinda suspected that, since Barney Frank and Chris Dodd and Chuck Schumer now hold the reins of power more than ever, and someone would lose out if they were crossed by a bunch of TV producers.
February 16, 2009 at 6:10 PM #347989patientrenterParticipant[quote=UCGal][quote=patientrenter]I missed this show. (I don’t have a TV.) Did they cover the role of Congress and FNMA and FHA and Freddie…? The Congressmen who pushed banks and regulators to shovel more money at housing are riding higher than ever before, and are probably too powerful to be fully exposed.[/quote]
They talked about Fannie and Freddie – but also pointed out that the real escalation of all this came when mortgages were bundled on wall street as MBSs and CDOs. Subprime, alt-a, etc. (Vs the GSE mortgages). I got the impression that having wallstreet willing to buy every mortgage made to securitize it and sell it was more a factor than fanny and freddie.
But maybe I misunderstood.
[/quote]Thanks, UCGal. Sounds like Congress got a free pass in this documentary. I kinda suspected that, since Barney Frank and Chris Dodd and Chuck Schumer now hold the reins of power more than ever, and someone would lose out if they were crossed by a bunch of TV producers.
February 16, 2009 at 6:31 PM #347425jpinpbParticipantFederal Loan Modification was one of the advertisers.
Greenspan said he was bewildered by CDOs
February 16, 2009 at 6:31 PM #347746jpinpbParticipantFederal Loan Modification was one of the advertisers.
Greenspan said he was bewildered by CDOs
February 16, 2009 at 6:31 PM #347863jpinpbParticipantFederal Loan Modification was one of the advertisers.
Greenspan said he was bewildered by CDOs
February 16, 2009 at 6:31 PM #347894jpinpbParticipantFederal Loan Modification was one of the advertisers.
Greenspan said he was bewildered by CDOs
February 16, 2009 at 6:31 PM #347994jpinpbParticipantFederal Loan Modification was one of the advertisers.
Greenspan said he was bewildered by CDOs
February 16, 2009 at 10:29 PM #347495CA renterParticipantThe GSEs were under scrutiny back in 2003/2004. They actually pulled back and did NOT engage in the riskiest types of mortgages until the govt forced them into it in the 2006/2007 era.
Bethany McLean did a good job covering this in this Vanity Fair Article:
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/02/fannie-and-freddie200902
February 16, 2009 at 10:29 PM #347817CA renterParticipantThe GSEs were under scrutiny back in 2003/2004. They actually pulled back and did NOT engage in the riskiest types of mortgages until the govt forced them into it in the 2006/2007 era.
Bethany McLean did a good job covering this in this Vanity Fair Article:
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/02/fannie-and-freddie200902
February 16, 2009 at 10:29 PM #347933CA renterParticipantThe GSEs were under scrutiny back in 2003/2004. They actually pulled back and did NOT engage in the riskiest types of mortgages until the govt forced them into it in the 2006/2007 era.
Bethany McLean did a good job covering this in this Vanity Fair Article:
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/02/fannie-and-freddie200902
February 16, 2009 at 10:29 PM #347965CA renterParticipantThe GSEs were under scrutiny back in 2003/2004. They actually pulled back and did NOT engage in the riskiest types of mortgages until the govt forced them into it in the 2006/2007 era.
Bethany McLean did a good job covering this in this Vanity Fair Article:
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/02/fannie-and-freddie200902
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.