Home sales beat January numbers in U.S. and state & stocks jump on home sales.

[LA_Renter]

Big Picture has a great write up on these bogus headlines

http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/03/how-counter-pro.html

“In a front page, 3rd paragraph snafu, the Journal writes: “On Monday, new data suggested that pressures like these are starting to drive prices low enough to attract some buyers back into the market. Sales of previously occupied homes jumped 2.9% in February from the month before, the National Association of Realtors said, the first increase since July.”

As we noted yesterday, that was not what the data stated at all: “Changes from January to February are measuring seasonal differences, not actual improvements in house sales.” Can you imagine what it would be like if we reported retail sales from December to January this way? Headlines would misleadingly state: “Retail sales plummet 65%!” That is why with highly seasonal data series, the preferred methodology is to report year-over-year data — not month-to-month variations.

And what were those numbers? The year-over-year data for existing home sales were DOWN 23.8% below February 2007 levels. That datapoint never found its way into the WSJ article at all. I cannot recall a more blatant misreporting of fact, or a larger or more embarrassing error in a front page WSJ article, ever.

While the NAR might be high-fiving each other over their successful deception at the Journal, they may wish to reconsider. As we noted over a year ago, many realtors in the field are finding the NAR tactics frustratingly counter-productive.

Why? It seems that Realtors were having a hard have time convincing home sellers to price their houses more realistically. Even as home builders were slashing new-home prices to move bloated inventories, “many home sellers are still holding off, hoping – along with FAR and NAR – that prices will start moving back up soon.” Hence, the impact of today’s successful deception and incompetence on the part of the WSJ may ultimately be less flexible pricing of homes, negatively impacting sales.

Call it another pyrrhic victory for the National Association of Realtors “

[capeman]

The irony in that is that the NAR is fighting a losing battle. They can put up all of the bogus headlines they want but the reality is there are fewer Realtors around to High-five each other due to the job losses!

It was much more frustrating to watch the propaganda during the bubble while now you can just watch them and laugh as they become insignificant.

[capeman]

The irony in that is that the NAR is fighting a losing battle. They can put up all of the bogus headlines they want but the reality is there are fewer Realtors around to High-five each other due to the job losses!

It was much more frustrating to watch the propaganda during the bubble while now you can just watch them and laugh as they become insignificant.

[capeman]

The irony in that is that the NAR is fighting a losing battle. They can put up all of the bogus headlines they want but the reality is there are fewer Realtors around to High-five each other due to the job losses!

It was much more frustrating to watch the propaganda during the bubble while now you can just watch them and laugh as they become insignificant.

[capeman]

The irony in that is that the NAR is fighting a losing battle. They can put up all of the bogus headlines they want but the reality is there are fewer Realtors around to High-five each other due to the job losses!

It was much more frustrating to watch the propaganda during the bubble while now you can just watch them and laugh as they become insignificant.

[capeman]

The irony in that is that the NAR is fighting a losing battle. They can put up all of the bogus headlines they want but the reality is there are fewer Realtors around to High-five each other due to the job losses!

It was much more frustrating to watch the propaganda during the bubble while now you can just watch them and laugh as they become insignificant.

[Author]

Posts