Home prices back to 2003 levels – according to the UT

[fendter619]

Check out this article in the UT today. Says that home prices are back down to 2003 levels.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/business/20071114-9999-1b14prices.html

[Anonymous]

I’m pretty sure this is incorrect. I did a quick check in DataQuick’s archives, and found that the San Diego County median price for April 2003 was $358,000, not the $460,000 figure cited in the UT article. It sounds like we are back to 2004 prices, not 2003–huge difference given the enormous price spike that occurred in 2003 and the first half of 2004.

[Anonymous]

I’m pretty sure this is incorrect. I did a quick check in DataQuick’s archives, and found that the San Diego County median price for April 2003 was $358,000, not the $460,000 figure cited in the UT article. It sounds like we are back to 2004 prices, not 2003–huge difference given the enormous price spike that occurred in 2003 and the first half of 2004.

[Anonymous]

I’m pretty sure this is incorrect. I did a quick check in DataQuick’s archives, and found that the San Diego County median price for April 2003 was $358,000, not the $460,000 figure cited in the UT article. It sounds like we are back to 2004 prices, not 2003–huge difference given the enormous price spike that occurred in 2003 and the first half of 2004.

[Anonymous]

I’m pretty sure this is incorrect. I did a quick check in DataQuick’s archives, and found that the San Diego County median price for April 2003 was $358,000, not the $460,000 figure cited in the UT article. It sounds like we are back to 2004 prices, not 2003–huge difference given the enormous price spike that occurred in 2003 and the first half of 2004.

[Bugs]

We might be at 2003 prices for a few areas in town, but I don’t think that’s true for most areas.

[Bugs]

We might be at 2003 prices for a few areas in town, but I don’t think that’s true for most areas.

[Bugs]

We might be at 2003 prices for a few areas in town, but I don’t think that’s true for most areas.

[Bugs]

We might be at 2003 prices for a few areas in town, but I don’t think that’s true for most areas.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

I saw the article on-line late yesterday and I could have sworn it said 2004 prices. Must have been mis-edited overnight.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

I saw the article on-line late yesterday and I could have sworn it said 2004 prices. Must have been mis-edited overnight.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

I saw the article on-line late yesterday and I could have sworn it said 2004 prices. Must have been mis-edited overnight.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

I saw the article on-line late yesterday and I could have sworn it said 2004 prices. Must have been mis-edited overnight.

[Anonymous]

Below is a link to DataQuick’s archived monthly report regarding April 2003 prices. As you will see, it states that the SD median price that month was $358,000. How interesting that I was able to find this in about three minutes, and that it is the same source cited (erroneously) by the UT. I sent an email to the author of the article pointing out the apparent error and providing this link.

http://www.dqnews.com/AA2003SCA0503.shtm

[Anonymous]

Below is a link to DataQuick’s archived monthly report regarding April 2003 prices. As you will see, it states that the SD median price that month was $358,000. How interesting that I was able to find this in about three minutes, and that it is the same source cited (erroneously) by the UT. I sent an email to the author of the article pointing out the apparent error and providing this link.

http://www.dqnews.com/AA2003SCA0503.shtm

[Author]

Posts