Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Historical Designation
- This topic has 70 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by
Ricechex.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 19, 2010 at 9:41 AM #528821March 19, 2010 at 9:50 AM #527890
briansd1
GuestI personally don’t think those houses in La Jolla are worth preserving.
They are just wood bungalows and should be torn down.
The preservation movement is ridiculous in my opinion. We end up with old housing that no longer meet out standards of comfort. People should be allowed to tear down and remodel more easily.
March 19, 2010 at 9:50 AM #528023GuestI personally don’t think those houses in La Jolla are worth preserving.
They are just wood bungalows and should be torn down.
The preservation movement is ridiculous in my opinion. We end up with old housing that no longer meet out standards of comfort. People should be allowed to tear down and remodel more easily.
March 19, 2010 at 9:50 AM #528472GuestI personally don’t think those houses in La Jolla are worth preserving.
They are just wood bungalows and should be torn down.
The preservation movement is ridiculous in my opinion. We end up with old housing that no longer meet out standards of comfort. People should be allowed to tear down and remodel more easily.
March 19, 2010 at 9:50 AM #528568GuestI personally don’t think those houses in La Jolla are worth preserving.
They are just wood bungalows and should be torn down.
The preservation movement is ridiculous in my opinion. We end up with old housing that no longer meet out standards of comfort. People should be allowed to tear down and remodel more easily.
March 19, 2010 at 9:50 AM #528826GuestI personally don’t think those houses in La Jolla are worth preserving.
They are just wood bungalows and should be torn down.
The preservation movement is ridiculous in my opinion. We end up with old housing that no longer meet out standards of comfort. People should be allowed to tear down and remodel more easily.
March 20, 2010 at 3:16 AM #528156CA renter
Participant[quote=briansd1]I personally don’t think those houses in La Jolla are worth preserving.
They are just wood bungalows and should be torn down.
The preservation movement is ridiculous in my opinion. We end up with old housing that no longer meet out standards of comfort. People should be allowed to tear down and remodel more easily.[/quote]
Ack, no!!!
While you might not appreciate the beauty and character of historic buildings, many other people do. You can build a crappy new building anywhere, any day; but the old historic buildings can never be replicated authentically.
I’m all for saving old buildings and making sure they are kept in the hands of people who appreciate them.
Hard to believe those cottages have been empty for 33 years. What were they thinking????
March 20, 2010 at 3:16 AM #528288Participant[quote=briansd1]I personally don’t think those houses in La Jolla are worth preserving.
They are just wood bungalows and should be torn down.
The preservation movement is ridiculous in my opinion. We end up with old housing that no longer meet out standards of comfort. People should be allowed to tear down and remodel more easily.[/quote]
Ack, no!!!
While you might not appreciate the beauty and character of historic buildings, many other people do. You can build a crappy new building anywhere, any day; but the old historic buildings can never be replicated authentically.
I’m all for saving old buildings and making sure they are kept in the hands of people who appreciate them.
Hard to believe those cottages have been empty for 33 years. What were they thinking????
March 20, 2010 at 3:16 AM #528737Participant[quote=briansd1]I personally don’t think those houses in La Jolla are worth preserving.
They are just wood bungalows and should be torn down.
The preservation movement is ridiculous in my opinion. We end up with old housing that no longer meet out standards of comfort. People should be allowed to tear down and remodel more easily.[/quote]
Ack, no!!!
While you might not appreciate the beauty and character of historic buildings, many other people do. You can build a crappy new building anywhere, any day; but the old historic buildings can never be replicated authentically.
I’m all for saving old buildings and making sure they are kept in the hands of people who appreciate them.
Hard to believe those cottages have been empty for 33 years. What were they thinking????
March 20, 2010 at 3:16 AM #528833Participant[quote=briansd1]I personally don’t think those houses in La Jolla are worth preserving.
They are just wood bungalows and should be torn down.
The preservation movement is ridiculous in my opinion. We end up with old housing that no longer meet out standards of comfort. People should be allowed to tear down and remodel more easily.[/quote]
Ack, no!!!
While you might not appreciate the beauty and character of historic buildings, many other people do. You can build a crappy new building anywhere, any day; but the old historic buildings can never be replicated authentically.
I’m all for saving old buildings and making sure they are kept in the hands of people who appreciate them.
Hard to believe those cottages have been empty for 33 years. What were they thinking????
March 20, 2010 at 3:16 AM #529093Participant[quote=briansd1]I personally don’t think those houses in La Jolla are worth preserving.
They are just wood bungalows and should be torn down.
The preservation movement is ridiculous in my opinion. We end up with old housing that no longer meet out standards of comfort. People should be allowed to tear down and remodel more easily.[/quote]
Ack, no!!!
While you might not appreciate the beauty and character of historic buildings, many other people do. You can build a crappy new building anywhere, any day; but the old historic buildings can never be replicated authentically.
I’m all for saving old buildings and making sure they are kept in the hands of people who appreciate them.
Hard to believe those cottages have been empty for 33 years. What were they thinking????
March 20, 2010 at 10:48 AM #528201no_such_reality
ParticipantIsn’t the main issue that you then subject yourself to the HRB. Basically an HOA with Governmental Authority to review and authorize any modifications to your home. Like an HOA it’s volunteer based and YMMV depending on the board. But, in some areas, they dictate right down to the colors you can paint.
March 20, 2010 at 10:48 AM #528333ParticipantIsn’t the main issue that you then subject yourself to the HRB. Basically an HOA with Governmental Authority to review and authorize any modifications to your home. Like an HOA it’s volunteer based and YMMV depending on the board. But, in some areas, they dictate right down to the colors you can paint.
March 20, 2010 at 10:48 AM #528782ParticipantIsn’t the main issue that you then subject yourself to the HRB. Basically an HOA with Governmental Authority to review and authorize any modifications to your home. Like an HOA it’s volunteer based and YMMV depending on the board. But, in some areas, they dictate right down to the colors you can paint.
March 20, 2010 at 10:48 AM #528878ParticipantIsn’t the main issue that you then subject yourself to the HRB. Basically an HOA with Governmental Authority to review and authorize any modifications to your home. Like an HOA it’s volunteer based and YMMV depending on the board. But, in some areas, they dictate right down to the colors you can paint.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.
