- This topic has 385 replies, 27 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by
Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 21, 2009 at 5:56 PM #352115February 21, 2009 at 6:18 PM #351551
sd_matt
ParticipantAllen
How much does the A3 weigh?
Havent heard of that fully auto shotgun. Think about trying to control a full auto 12ga. I hope it has some kind of trick up its sleeve.
Wasnt control under auto one of the complaints about the M14?
February 21, 2009 at 6:18 PM #351865ParticipantAllen
How much does the A3 weigh?
Havent heard of that fully auto shotgun. Think about trying to control a full auto 12ga. I hope it has some kind of trick up its sleeve.
Wasnt control under auto one of the complaints about the M14?
February 21, 2009 at 6:18 PM #351991ParticipantAllen
How much does the A3 weigh?
Havent heard of that fully auto shotgun. Think about trying to control a full auto 12ga. I hope it has some kind of trick up its sleeve.
Wasnt control under auto one of the complaints about the M14?
February 21, 2009 at 6:18 PM #352024ParticipantAllen
How much does the A3 weigh?
Havent heard of that fully auto shotgun. Think about trying to control a full auto 12ga. I hope it has some kind of trick up its sleeve.
Wasnt control under auto one of the complaints about the M14?
February 21, 2009 at 6:18 PM #352125ParticipantAllen
How much does the A3 weigh?
Havent heard of that fully auto shotgun. Think about trying to control a full auto 12ga. I hope it has some kind of trick up its sleeve.
Wasnt control under auto one of the complaints about the M14?
February 21, 2009 at 6:25 PM #351571Allan from Fallbrook
Participantsd_matt: I want to say 19lbs. The original “pig” (M-60) weighed in at 23lbs and this was lighter and shorter (in terms of barrel length).
Yeah, the M-14 had issues at full auto. The guys I trained (Salvadoran Army) used the H&K G3, which is also a selective fire weapon and in 7.62mm NATO. Same problem there, too, on full auto: Hard to control. That M-14 was a sweet weapon, though. My dad was a huge fan of the M-1 Garand, having carried one in WWII and Korea, and I think the M-14 was superior to even the Garand. I grew up shooting .30-06, so I like the bigger cartridges, especially in comparison to .223/5.56mm.
The AA12 is gas operated, which contributes significantly to control and it fires some very cool rounds designed specifically for the weapon. One of them is a fin-stabilized 12ga grenade (no shit, I swear I’m not making that up). It chugs out 12ga at about 300 rounds a minute off of a drum magazine. I love my Remmie 870, but I’d drop that in a heartbeat for this beast.
February 21, 2009 at 6:25 PM #351884Participantsd_matt: I want to say 19lbs. The original “pig” (M-60) weighed in at 23lbs and this was lighter and shorter (in terms of barrel length).
Yeah, the M-14 had issues at full auto. The guys I trained (Salvadoran Army) used the H&K G3, which is also a selective fire weapon and in 7.62mm NATO. Same problem there, too, on full auto: Hard to control. That M-14 was a sweet weapon, though. My dad was a huge fan of the M-1 Garand, having carried one in WWII and Korea, and I think the M-14 was superior to even the Garand. I grew up shooting .30-06, so I like the bigger cartridges, especially in comparison to .223/5.56mm.
The AA12 is gas operated, which contributes significantly to control and it fires some very cool rounds designed specifically for the weapon. One of them is a fin-stabilized 12ga grenade (no shit, I swear I’m not making that up). It chugs out 12ga at about 300 rounds a minute off of a drum magazine. I love my Remmie 870, but I’d drop that in a heartbeat for this beast.
February 21, 2009 at 6:25 PM #352011Participantsd_matt: I want to say 19lbs. The original “pig” (M-60) weighed in at 23lbs and this was lighter and shorter (in terms of barrel length).
Yeah, the M-14 had issues at full auto. The guys I trained (Salvadoran Army) used the H&K G3, which is also a selective fire weapon and in 7.62mm NATO. Same problem there, too, on full auto: Hard to control. That M-14 was a sweet weapon, though. My dad was a huge fan of the M-1 Garand, having carried one in WWII and Korea, and I think the M-14 was superior to even the Garand. I grew up shooting .30-06, so I like the bigger cartridges, especially in comparison to .223/5.56mm.
The AA12 is gas operated, which contributes significantly to control and it fires some very cool rounds designed specifically for the weapon. One of them is a fin-stabilized 12ga grenade (no shit, I swear I’m not making that up). It chugs out 12ga at about 300 rounds a minute off of a drum magazine. I love my Remmie 870, but I’d drop that in a heartbeat for this beast.
February 21, 2009 at 6:25 PM #352044Participantsd_matt: I want to say 19lbs. The original “pig” (M-60) weighed in at 23lbs and this was lighter and shorter (in terms of barrel length).
Yeah, the M-14 had issues at full auto. The guys I trained (Salvadoran Army) used the H&K G3, which is also a selective fire weapon and in 7.62mm NATO. Same problem there, too, on full auto: Hard to control. That M-14 was a sweet weapon, though. My dad was a huge fan of the M-1 Garand, having carried one in WWII and Korea, and I think the M-14 was superior to even the Garand. I grew up shooting .30-06, so I like the bigger cartridges, especially in comparison to .223/5.56mm.
The AA12 is gas operated, which contributes significantly to control and it fires some very cool rounds designed specifically for the weapon. One of them is a fin-stabilized 12ga grenade (no shit, I swear I’m not making that up). It chugs out 12ga at about 300 rounds a minute off of a drum magazine. I love my Remmie 870, but I’d drop that in a heartbeat for this beast.
February 21, 2009 at 6:25 PM #352145Participantsd_matt: I want to say 19lbs. The original “pig” (M-60) weighed in at 23lbs and this was lighter and shorter (in terms of barrel length).
Yeah, the M-14 had issues at full auto. The guys I trained (Salvadoran Army) used the H&K G3, which is also a selective fire weapon and in 7.62mm NATO. Same problem there, too, on full auto: Hard to control. That M-14 was a sweet weapon, though. My dad was a huge fan of the M-1 Garand, having carried one in WWII and Korea, and I think the M-14 was superior to even the Garand. I grew up shooting .30-06, so I like the bigger cartridges, especially in comparison to .223/5.56mm.
The AA12 is gas operated, which contributes significantly to control and it fires some very cool rounds designed specifically for the weapon. One of them is a fin-stabilized 12ga grenade (no shit, I swear I’m not making that up). It chugs out 12ga at about 300 rounds a minute off of a drum magazine. I love my Remmie 870, but I’d drop that in a heartbeat for this beast.
February 21, 2009 at 6:51 PM #351611David J
Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]My dad was a huge fan of the M-1 Garand, having carried one in WWII and Korea, and I think the M-14 was superior to even the Garand. [/quote]
We just shot an M-1 Garand yesterday, and I don’t know how they did it back then.
February 21, 2009 at 6:51 PM #351925Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]My dad was a huge fan of the M-1 Garand, having carried one in WWII and Korea, and I think the M-14 was superior to even the Garand. [/quote]
We just shot an M-1 Garand yesterday, and I don’t know how they did it back then.
February 21, 2009 at 6:51 PM #352051Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]My dad was a huge fan of the M-1 Garand, having carried one in WWII and Korea, and I think the M-14 was superior to even the Garand. [/quote]
We just shot an M-1 Garand yesterday, and I don’t know how they did it back then.
February 21, 2009 at 6:51 PM #352084Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]My dad was a huge fan of the M-1 Garand, having carried one in WWII and Korea, and I think the M-14 was superior to even the Garand. [/quote]
We just shot an M-1 Garand yesterday, and I don’t know how they did it back then.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.