- This topic has 510 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 6 months ago by
sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 11, 2011 at 5:22 PM #695809May 11, 2011 at 5:24 PM #694624
Rich ToscanoKeymasterRight, nobody can argue that it’s a positive, but is it a significant negative?
sdr says no, that it’s the same to qualify for both types of loans. But for instance sdr, I’ve heard that down payment requirements are higher for non-conforming loans… if this is true, (even if “qualifying” is otherwise the same), that represents a tightening of financing for this price range. Any idea whether that’s the case?
May 11, 2011 at 5:24 PM #694708Rich ToscanoKeymasterRight, nobody can argue that it’s a positive, but is it a significant negative?
sdr says no, that it’s the same to qualify for both types of loans. But for instance sdr, I’ve heard that down payment requirements are higher for non-conforming loans… if this is true, (even if “qualifying” is otherwise the same), that represents a tightening of financing for this price range. Any idea whether that’s the case?
May 11, 2011 at 5:24 PM #695312Rich ToscanoKeymasterRight, nobody can argue that it’s a positive, but is it a significant negative?
sdr says no, that it’s the same to qualify for both types of loans. But for instance sdr, I’ve heard that down payment requirements are higher for non-conforming loans… if this is true, (even if “qualifying” is otherwise the same), that represents a tightening of financing for this price range. Any idea whether that’s the case?
May 11, 2011 at 5:24 PM #695460Rich ToscanoKeymasterRight, nobody can argue that it’s a positive, but is it a significant negative?
sdr says no, that it’s the same to qualify for both types of loans. But for instance sdr, I’ve heard that down payment requirements are higher for non-conforming loans… if this is true, (even if “qualifying” is otherwise the same), that represents a tightening of financing for this price range. Any idea whether that’s the case?
May 11, 2011 at 5:24 PM #695814Rich ToscanoKeymasterRight, nobody can argue that it’s a positive, but is it a significant negative?
sdr says no, that it’s the same to qualify for both types of loans. But for instance sdr, I’ve heard that down payment requirements are higher for non-conforming loans… if this is true, (even if “qualifying” is otherwise the same), that represents a tightening of financing for this price range. Any idea whether that’s the case?
May 11, 2011 at 5:31 PM #694629bearishgurl
Participant[quote=earlyretirement] . . .Yeah, real estate prices vary in various areas like California and New York. But my philosophy is if you can’t afford a given area, move to a cheaper area that is more affordable.[/quote]
Exactly.
May 11, 2011 at 5:31 PM #694713Participant[quote=earlyretirement] . . .Yeah, real estate prices vary in various areas like California and New York. But my philosophy is if you can’t afford a given area, move to a cheaper area that is more affordable.[/quote]
Exactly.
May 11, 2011 at 5:31 PM #695317Participant[quote=earlyretirement] . . .Yeah, real estate prices vary in various areas like California and New York. But my philosophy is if you can’t afford a given area, move to a cheaper area that is more affordable.[/quote]
Exactly.
May 11, 2011 at 5:31 PM #695465Participant[quote=earlyretirement] . . .Yeah, real estate prices vary in various areas like California and New York. But my philosophy is if you can’t afford a given area, move to a cheaper area that is more affordable.[/quote]
Exactly.
May 11, 2011 at 5:31 PM #695819Participant[quote=earlyretirement] . . .Yeah, real estate prices vary in various areas like California and New York. But my philosophy is if you can’t afford a given area, move to a cheaper area that is more affordable.[/quote]
Exactly.
May 11, 2011 at 5:33 PM #694634Rich ToscanoKeymasterOops in looking thru the posts again I see I missed bg’s post saying she thinks that jumbos require a 30% down pmt. I had read that somewhere as well. That’s the kind of thing I’m talking about… if true, that’s a definite tightening.
May 11, 2011 at 5:33 PM #694719Rich ToscanoKeymasterOops in looking thru the posts again I see I missed bg’s post saying she thinks that jumbos require a 30% down pmt. I had read that somewhere as well. That’s the kind of thing I’m talking about… if true, that’s a definite tightening.
May 11, 2011 at 5:33 PM #695322Rich ToscanoKeymasterOops in looking thru the posts again I see I missed bg’s post saying she thinks that jumbos require a 30% down pmt. I had read that somewhere as well. That’s the kind of thing I’m talking about… if true, that’s a definite tightening.
May 11, 2011 at 5:33 PM #695470Rich ToscanoKeymasterOops in looking thru the posts again I see I missed bg’s post saying she thinks that jumbos require a 30% down pmt. I had read that somewhere as well. That’s the kind of thing I’m talking about… if true, that’s a definite tightening.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.