Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › griffin federal reserve
- This topic has 750 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by (former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 12, 2010 at 11:17 AM #617480October 12, 2010 at 11:18 AM #616420daveljParticipant
[quote=investor]Don’t reference your friend a seal member unless you are one two. [/quote]
Allan, I apologize but I have to butt in here. You can address the other parts of that post if you like, but I pose a question to the gallery: What percentage of dual-doctorate holders (even in Fine Arts) would misspell the word “two” in this sentence? I can see someone writing “to” and forgetting the extra “o”. That’s an obvious mistake but I can buy that as a typo. Happens to everyone occasionally. But “two”? That’s not a typo. That’s a misunderstanding of basic language conventions. I’m sorry… that’s just too far gone.
My bullshit detector just went off again… even louder.
October 12, 2010 at 11:18 AM #616506daveljParticipant[quote=investor]Don’t reference your friend a seal member unless you are one two. [/quote]
Allan, I apologize but I have to butt in here. You can address the other parts of that post if you like, but I pose a question to the gallery: What percentage of dual-doctorate holders (even in Fine Arts) would misspell the word “two” in this sentence? I can see someone writing “to” and forgetting the extra “o”. That’s an obvious mistake but I can buy that as a typo. Happens to everyone occasionally. But “two”? That’s not a typo. That’s a misunderstanding of basic language conventions. I’m sorry… that’s just too far gone.
My bullshit detector just went off again… even louder.
October 12, 2010 at 11:18 AM #617049daveljParticipant[quote=investor]Don’t reference your friend a seal member unless you are one two. [/quote]
Allan, I apologize but I have to butt in here. You can address the other parts of that post if you like, but I pose a question to the gallery: What percentage of dual-doctorate holders (even in Fine Arts) would misspell the word “two” in this sentence? I can see someone writing “to” and forgetting the extra “o”. That’s an obvious mistake but I can buy that as a typo. Happens to everyone occasionally. But “two”? That’s not a typo. That’s a misunderstanding of basic language conventions. I’m sorry… that’s just too far gone.
My bullshit detector just went off again… even louder.
October 12, 2010 at 11:18 AM #617170daveljParticipant[quote=investor]Don’t reference your friend a seal member unless you are one two. [/quote]
Allan, I apologize but I have to butt in here. You can address the other parts of that post if you like, but I pose a question to the gallery: What percentage of dual-doctorate holders (even in Fine Arts) would misspell the word “two” in this sentence? I can see someone writing “to” and forgetting the extra “o”. That’s an obvious mistake but I can buy that as a typo. Happens to everyone occasionally. But “two”? That’s not a typo. That’s a misunderstanding of basic language conventions. I’m sorry… that’s just too far gone.
My bullshit detector just went off again… even louder.
October 12, 2010 at 11:18 AM #617485daveljParticipant[quote=investor]Don’t reference your friend a seal member unless you are one two. [/quote]
Allan, I apologize but I have to butt in here. You can address the other parts of that post if you like, but I pose a question to the gallery: What percentage of dual-doctorate holders (even in Fine Arts) would misspell the word “two” in this sentence? I can see someone writing “to” and forgetting the extra “o”. That’s an obvious mistake but I can buy that as a typo. Happens to everyone occasionally. But “two”? That’s not a typo. That’s a misunderstanding of basic language conventions. I’m sorry… that’s just too far gone.
My bullshit detector just went off again… even louder.
October 12, 2010 at 11:20 AM #616430daveljParticipant[quote=investor]So, one of the two of you brings up his degrees, I bring up mine and I am the smarty pants? Don’t make me go and find it, I don’t have the time right now.[/quote]
Let me shorten your work day for you. Don’t bother. You won’t find it. Because it doesn’t exist.
October 12, 2010 at 11:20 AM #616516daveljParticipant[quote=investor]So, one of the two of you brings up his degrees, I bring up mine and I am the smarty pants? Don’t make me go and find it, I don’t have the time right now.[/quote]
Let me shorten your work day for you. Don’t bother. You won’t find it. Because it doesn’t exist.
October 12, 2010 at 11:20 AM #617059daveljParticipant[quote=investor]So, one of the two of you brings up his degrees, I bring up mine and I am the smarty pants? Don’t make me go and find it, I don’t have the time right now.[/quote]
Let me shorten your work day for you. Don’t bother. You won’t find it. Because it doesn’t exist.
October 12, 2010 at 11:20 AM #617180daveljParticipant[quote=investor]So, one of the two of you brings up his degrees, I bring up mine and I am the smarty pants? Don’t make me go and find it, I don’t have the time right now.[/quote]
Let me shorten your work day for you. Don’t bother. You won’t find it. Because it doesn’t exist.
October 12, 2010 at 11:20 AM #617495daveljParticipant[quote=investor]So, one of the two of you brings up his degrees, I bring up mine and I am the smarty pants? Don’t make me go and find it, I don’t have the time right now.[/quote]
Let me shorten your work day for you. Don’t bother. You won’t find it. Because it doesn’t exist.
October 12, 2010 at 11:24 AM #616435investorParticipant[quote=davelj][quote=investor]
I just reviewed alot of the original tread. Aside from the joy of battling sarcastic wit with some of you, I have learned nothing new from most of the threads. Some of you are more interested in defending established ideas rather than questioning the status quo. Not worth my time frankly.[/quote]Allow me to translate: “Not worth my time frankly” means, “I have no rebuttal so I will come up with an excuse for not doing so. My excuse is: It’s ‘not worth my time.’ I’m a Very Important Person with Two Doctorates and 16 Years of Collage, for Christ’s sake!! I’m an “INVESTOR”!! And an Artist!!”[/quote]
Not worth my time refers to bringing up the old thread if all we are going to do is throw insults at each other, not defining my degrees. I don’t place too much importance on degrees but they do show an ability to stick to something hard for delayed gratification, which I do admire, so, as much as it pains me to compliment you davelj, again congrats on the multiple diplomas. You, I am sure, are proud of them as you should be. Now, back to the insults.October 12, 2010 at 11:24 AM #616521investorParticipant[quote=davelj][quote=investor]
I just reviewed alot of the original tread. Aside from the joy of battling sarcastic wit with some of you, I have learned nothing new from most of the threads. Some of you are more interested in defending established ideas rather than questioning the status quo. Not worth my time frankly.[/quote]Allow me to translate: “Not worth my time frankly” means, “I have no rebuttal so I will come up with an excuse for not doing so. My excuse is: It’s ‘not worth my time.’ I’m a Very Important Person with Two Doctorates and 16 Years of Collage, for Christ’s sake!! I’m an “INVESTOR”!! And an Artist!!”[/quote]
Not worth my time refers to bringing up the old thread if all we are going to do is throw insults at each other, not defining my degrees. I don’t place too much importance on degrees but they do show an ability to stick to something hard for delayed gratification, which I do admire, so, as much as it pains me to compliment you davelj, again congrats on the multiple diplomas. You, I am sure, are proud of them as you should be. Now, back to the insults.October 12, 2010 at 11:24 AM #617064investorParticipant[quote=davelj][quote=investor]
I just reviewed alot of the original tread. Aside from the joy of battling sarcastic wit with some of you, I have learned nothing new from most of the threads. Some of you are more interested in defending established ideas rather than questioning the status quo. Not worth my time frankly.[/quote]Allow me to translate: “Not worth my time frankly” means, “I have no rebuttal so I will come up with an excuse for not doing so. My excuse is: It’s ‘not worth my time.’ I’m a Very Important Person with Two Doctorates and 16 Years of Collage, for Christ’s sake!! I’m an “INVESTOR”!! And an Artist!!”[/quote]
Not worth my time refers to bringing up the old thread if all we are going to do is throw insults at each other, not defining my degrees. I don’t place too much importance on degrees but they do show an ability to stick to something hard for delayed gratification, which I do admire, so, as much as it pains me to compliment you davelj, again congrats on the multiple diplomas. You, I am sure, are proud of them as you should be. Now, back to the insults.October 12, 2010 at 11:24 AM #617185investorParticipant[quote=davelj][quote=investor]
I just reviewed alot of the original tread. Aside from the joy of battling sarcastic wit with some of you, I have learned nothing new from most of the threads. Some of you are more interested in defending established ideas rather than questioning the status quo. Not worth my time frankly.[/quote]Allow me to translate: “Not worth my time frankly” means, “I have no rebuttal so I will come up with an excuse for not doing so. My excuse is: It’s ‘not worth my time.’ I’m a Very Important Person with Two Doctorates and 16 Years of Collage, for Christ’s sake!! I’m an “INVESTOR”!! And an Artist!!”[/quote]
Not worth my time refers to bringing up the old thread if all we are going to do is throw insults at each other, not defining my degrees. I don’t place too much importance on degrees but they do show an ability to stick to something hard for delayed gratification, which I do admire, so, as much as it pains me to compliment you davelj, again congrats on the multiple diplomas. You, I am sure, are proud of them as you should be. Now, back to the insults. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.