- This topic has 40 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by
outtamojo.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 13, 2010 at 8:54 AM #564781June 13, 2010 at 8:59 AM #563802
outtamojo
ParticipantThey gonna be SOL cause I been readin that BP asks for tax returns on those kinds of claims- they’ll have to cook something else up.
June 13, 2010 at 8:59 AM #563898outtamojo
ParticipantThey gonna be SOL cause I been readin that BP asks for tax returns on those kinds of claims- they’ll have to cook something else up.
June 13, 2010 at 8:59 AM #564399outtamojo
ParticipantThey gonna be SOL cause I been readin that BP asks for tax returns on those kinds of claims- they’ll have to cook something else up.
June 13, 2010 at 8:59 AM #564505outtamojo
ParticipantThey gonna be SOL cause I been readin that BP asks for tax returns on those kinds of claims- they’ll have to cook something else up.
June 13, 2010 at 8:59 AM #564786outtamojo
ParticipantThey gonna be SOL cause I been readin that BP asks for tax returns on those kinds of claims- they’ll have to cook something else up.
June 13, 2010 at 9:27 AM #563832davelj
Participant[quote=outtamojo]They gonna be SOL cause I been readin that BP asks for tax returns on those kinds of claims- they’ll have to cook something else up.[/quote]
The argument is not what they’ve made in the past, it’s what they COULD have made in the future. And who’s to say what that number is?
For example, let’s say that six months ago I decided that I would get a shrimping license at some point this year and start shrimping. Well, now’s the time and – lo and behold – I see that BP has mucked up the Gulf. That’s not my fault is it?
Don’t get me wrong – this is not a strong argument – it’s flimsy as hell. But… let’s say that a class action is formed for all such folks. How do you think that suit is going to fare in a Louisiana court considering who the defendant is? That’s a rhetorical question.
June 13, 2010 at 9:27 AM #563928davelj
Participant[quote=outtamojo]They gonna be SOL cause I been readin that BP asks for tax returns on those kinds of claims- they’ll have to cook something else up.[/quote]
The argument is not what they’ve made in the past, it’s what they COULD have made in the future. And who’s to say what that number is?
For example, let’s say that six months ago I decided that I would get a shrimping license at some point this year and start shrimping. Well, now’s the time and – lo and behold – I see that BP has mucked up the Gulf. That’s not my fault is it?
Don’t get me wrong – this is not a strong argument – it’s flimsy as hell. But… let’s say that a class action is formed for all such folks. How do you think that suit is going to fare in a Louisiana court considering who the defendant is? That’s a rhetorical question.
June 13, 2010 at 9:27 AM #564428davelj
Participant[quote=outtamojo]They gonna be SOL cause I been readin that BP asks for tax returns on those kinds of claims- they’ll have to cook something else up.[/quote]
The argument is not what they’ve made in the past, it’s what they COULD have made in the future. And who’s to say what that number is?
For example, let’s say that six months ago I decided that I would get a shrimping license at some point this year and start shrimping. Well, now’s the time and – lo and behold – I see that BP has mucked up the Gulf. That’s not my fault is it?
Don’t get me wrong – this is not a strong argument – it’s flimsy as hell. But… let’s say that a class action is formed for all such folks. How do you think that suit is going to fare in a Louisiana court considering who the defendant is? That’s a rhetorical question.
June 13, 2010 at 9:27 AM #564535davelj
Participant[quote=outtamojo]They gonna be SOL cause I been readin that BP asks for tax returns on those kinds of claims- they’ll have to cook something else up.[/quote]
The argument is not what they’ve made in the past, it’s what they COULD have made in the future. And who’s to say what that number is?
For example, let’s say that six months ago I decided that I would get a shrimping license at some point this year and start shrimping. Well, now’s the time and – lo and behold – I see that BP has mucked up the Gulf. That’s not my fault is it?
Don’t get me wrong – this is not a strong argument – it’s flimsy as hell. But… let’s say that a class action is formed for all such folks. How do you think that suit is going to fare in a Louisiana court considering who the defendant is? That’s a rhetorical question.
June 13, 2010 at 9:27 AM #564815davelj
Participant[quote=outtamojo]They gonna be SOL cause I been readin that BP asks for tax returns on those kinds of claims- they’ll have to cook something else up.[/quote]
The argument is not what they’ve made in the past, it’s what they COULD have made in the future. And who’s to say what that number is?
For example, let’s say that six months ago I decided that I would get a shrimping license at some point this year and start shrimping. Well, now’s the time and – lo and behold – I see that BP has mucked up the Gulf. That’s not my fault is it?
Don’t get me wrong – this is not a strong argument – it’s flimsy as hell. But… let’s say that a class action is formed for all such folks. How do you think that suit is going to fare in a Louisiana court considering who the defendant is? That’s a rhetorical question.
June 13, 2010 at 9:51 AM #563852briansd1
Guestdavelj, just to argue the other side here. Net Present Value is derived from future value.
If some future value is wiped out, then there’s a loss to NPV.
Imagine Del Mar Beach coated with oil and unusable through an act of negligence for the next 2 generations. Would the party that caused the damage have to pay reparations? What about homeowners who never bathed in the ocean but enjoyed a nice view that’s now been ruined?
What about teenagers who are turning 18? They intended all along to enter the scrimping/fishing business of their parents or relatives. Now their future opportunity is wiped out. Should they not be compensated?
June 13, 2010 at 9:51 AM #563948briansd1
Guestdavelj, just to argue the other side here. Net Present Value is derived from future value.
If some future value is wiped out, then there’s a loss to NPV.
Imagine Del Mar Beach coated with oil and unusable through an act of negligence for the next 2 generations. Would the party that caused the damage have to pay reparations? What about homeowners who never bathed in the ocean but enjoyed a nice view that’s now been ruined?
What about teenagers who are turning 18? They intended all along to enter the scrimping/fishing business of their parents or relatives. Now their future opportunity is wiped out. Should they not be compensated?
June 13, 2010 at 9:51 AM #564448briansd1
Guestdavelj, just to argue the other side here. Net Present Value is derived from future value.
If some future value is wiped out, then there’s a loss to NPV.
Imagine Del Mar Beach coated with oil and unusable through an act of negligence for the next 2 generations. Would the party that caused the damage have to pay reparations? What about homeowners who never bathed in the ocean but enjoyed a nice view that’s now been ruined?
What about teenagers who are turning 18? They intended all along to enter the scrimping/fishing business of their parents or relatives. Now their future opportunity is wiped out. Should they not be compensated?
June 13, 2010 at 9:51 AM #564554briansd1
Guestdavelj, just to argue the other side here. Net Present Value is derived from future value.
If some future value is wiped out, then there’s a loss to NPV.
Imagine Del Mar Beach coated with oil and unusable through an act of negligence for the next 2 generations. Would the party that caused the damage have to pay reparations? What about homeowners who never bathed in the ocean but enjoyed a nice view that’s now been ruined?
What about teenagers who are turning 18? They intended all along to enter the scrimping/fishing business of their parents or relatives. Now their future opportunity is wiped out. Should they not be compensated?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
