- This topic has 85 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 3 months ago by scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 9, 2010 at 6:47 AM #602489September 9, 2010 at 6:48 AM #602583XBoxBoyParticipant
[quote=urbanrealtor]Since we don’t currently have a gold or silver standard, what is the importance of gold in long term government storage?[/quote]
The view of many economists (and probably Ben Bernanke) is that there is no need to have gold in the vault. Others would counter that having all this gold helps provide credibility (and stability) to the dollar. If there was a serious dollar crisis, the fed could always use the gold to help shore up the dollar. Think of it as an insurance policy, you don’t really need it, until you need it.
There’s another possible explanation, because it’s there. Openly selling it could be too disruptive to the markets. It would be hard to estimate what reaction the markets would have to an announcement that the fed was selling all it’s gold. So, no one wants to chance the reaction from selling it all. (Although presumably you could sell it off slowly and quietly and I think that’s what Ron Paul thinks has happened.)
Personally, I think it’s a combination of reasons. But as far as I know, there isn’t an overwhelming reason to have that gold in the vault since we don’t back our dollars with it.
Just my two ingots.
September 9, 2010 at 6:48 AM #603131XBoxBoyParticipant[quote=urbanrealtor]Since we don’t currently have a gold or silver standard, what is the importance of gold in long term government storage?[/quote]
The view of many economists (and probably Ben Bernanke) is that there is no need to have gold in the vault. Others would counter that having all this gold helps provide credibility (and stability) to the dollar. If there was a serious dollar crisis, the fed could always use the gold to help shore up the dollar. Think of it as an insurance policy, you don’t really need it, until you need it.
There’s another possible explanation, because it’s there. Openly selling it could be too disruptive to the markets. It would be hard to estimate what reaction the markets would have to an announcement that the fed was selling all it’s gold. So, no one wants to chance the reaction from selling it all. (Although presumably you could sell it off slowly and quietly and I think that’s what Ron Paul thinks has happened.)
Personally, I think it’s a combination of reasons. But as far as I know, there isn’t an overwhelming reason to have that gold in the vault since we don’t back our dollars with it.
Just my two ingots.
September 9, 2010 at 6:48 AM #602494XBoxBoyParticipant[quote=urbanrealtor]Since we don’t currently have a gold or silver standard, what is the importance of gold in long term government storage?[/quote]
The view of many economists (and probably Ben Bernanke) is that there is no need to have gold in the vault. Others would counter that having all this gold helps provide credibility (and stability) to the dollar. If there was a serious dollar crisis, the fed could always use the gold to help shore up the dollar. Think of it as an insurance policy, you don’t really need it, until you need it.
There’s another possible explanation, because it’s there. Openly selling it could be too disruptive to the markets. It would be hard to estimate what reaction the markets would have to an announcement that the fed was selling all it’s gold. So, no one wants to chance the reaction from selling it all. (Although presumably you could sell it off slowly and quietly and I think that’s what Ron Paul thinks has happened.)
Personally, I think it’s a combination of reasons. But as far as I know, there isn’t an overwhelming reason to have that gold in the vault since we don’t back our dollars with it.
Just my two ingots.
September 9, 2010 at 6:48 AM #603555XBoxBoyParticipant[quote=urbanrealtor]Since we don’t currently have a gold or silver standard, what is the importance of gold in long term government storage?[/quote]
The view of many economists (and probably Ben Bernanke) is that there is no need to have gold in the vault. Others would counter that having all this gold helps provide credibility (and stability) to the dollar. If there was a serious dollar crisis, the fed could always use the gold to help shore up the dollar. Think of it as an insurance policy, you don’t really need it, until you need it.
There’s another possible explanation, because it’s there. Openly selling it could be too disruptive to the markets. It would be hard to estimate what reaction the markets would have to an announcement that the fed was selling all it’s gold. So, no one wants to chance the reaction from selling it all. (Although presumably you could sell it off slowly and quietly and I think that’s what Ron Paul thinks has happened.)
Personally, I think it’s a combination of reasons. But as far as I know, there isn’t an overwhelming reason to have that gold in the vault since we don’t back our dollars with it.
Just my two ingots.
September 9, 2010 at 6:48 AM #603237XBoxBoyParticipant[quote=urbanrealtor]Since we don’t currently have a gold or silver standard, what is the importance of gold in long term government storage?[/quote]
The view of many economists (and probably Ben Bernanke) is that there is no need to have gold in the vault. Others would counter that having all this gold helps provide credibility (and stability) to the dollar. If there was a serious dollar crisis, the fed could always use the gold to help shore up the dollar. Think of it as an insurance policy, you don’t really need it, until you need it.
There’s another possible explanation, because it’s there. Openly selling it could be too disruptive to the markets. It would be hard to estimate what reaction the markets would have to an announcement that the fed was selling all it’s gold. So, no one wants to chance the reaction from selling it all. (Although presumably you could sell it off slowly and quietly and I think that’s what Ron Paul thinks has happened.)
Personally, I think it’s a combination of reasons. But as far as I know, there isn’t an overwhelming reason to have that gold in the vault since we don’t back our dollars with it.
Just my two ingots.
September 9, 2010 at 7:02 AM #603560ArrayaParticipant[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=Arraya][quote=urbanrealtor]
My questions is this:
Since we don’t currently have a gold or silver standard, what is the importance of gold in long term government storage?I am not arguing. Its a serious question and I would like to hear actual views on it.[/quote]
Well, it’s kind of a silly question. It’s like saying since I am not currently in Europe, what does it matter if my suitcase full of Euros is still in my safety deposit box.
RP is just anticipating a forced relocation to Europe and wants to know what we are working with[/quote]
No.
I go to Europe a lot so that would matter to me more.
This is a bit…more…disconnected from me.
But to recap, the concern is that we will need the gold shortly?
What would be the circumstances for needing it?[/quote]I think it would matter a little bit if your money went missing.
Ok, let me put it another way. Simply, he thinks, it is, possibly, not there, as in, missing, stolen, etc… Which given the revolving door of criminals through out the decades of financial officialdom, is not completely insane. Second, he sees the inevitable collapse and loss of confidence of our monetary system, as they all do, eventually. Failures, crises and collapses are built into monetary systems. Gold really does not fix that, though as goldbugs erroneously think. I guess, in a way he wants to see what the countries assets are in case of calamity.
September 9, 2010 at 7:02 AM #603242ArrayaParticipant[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=Arraya][quote=urbanrealtor]
My questions is this:
Since we don’t currently have a gold or silver standard, what is the importance of gold in long term government storage?I am not arguing. Its a serious question and I would like to hear actual views on it.[/quote]
Well, it’s kind of a silly question. It’s like saying since I am not currently in Europe, what does it matter if my suitcase full of Euros is still in my safety deposit box.
RP is just anticipating a forced relocation to Europe and wants to know what we are working with[/quote]
No.
I go to Europe a lot so that would matter to me more.
This is a bit…more…disconnected from me.
But to recap, the concern is that we will need the gold shortly?
What would be the circumstances for needing it?[/quote]I think it would matter a little bit if your money went missing.
Ok, let me put it another way. Simply, he thinks, it is, possibly, not there, as in, missing, stolen, etc… Which given the revolving door of criminals through out the decades of financial officialdom, is not completely insane. Second, he sees the inevitable collapse and loss of confidence of our monetary system, as they all do, eventually. Failures, crises and collapses are built into monetary systems. Gold really does not fix that, though as goldbugs erroneously think. I guess, in a way he wants to see what the countries assets are in case of calamity.
September 9, 2010 at 7:02 AM #603136ArrayaParticipant[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=Arraya][quote=urbanrealtor]
My questions is this:
Since we don’t currently have a gold or silver standard, what is the importance of gold in long term government storage?I am not arguing. Its a serious question and I would like to hear actual views on it.[/quote]
Well, it’s kind of a silly question. It’s like saying since I am not currently in Europe, what does it matter if my suitcase full of Euros is still in my safety deposit box.
RP is just anticipating a forced relocation to Europe and wants to know what we are working with[/quote]
No.
I go to Europe a lot so that would matter to me more.
This is a bit…more…disconnected from me.
But to recap, the concern is that we will need the gold shortly?
What would be the circumstances for needing it?[/quote]I think it would matter a little bit if your money went missing.
Ok, let me put it another way. Simply, he thinks, it is, possibly, not there, as in, missing, stolen, etc… Which given the revolving door of criminals through out the decades of financial officialdom, is not completely insane. Second, he sees the inevitable collapse and loss of confidence of our monetary system, as they all do, eventually. Failures, crises and collapses are built into monetary systems. Gold really does not fix that, though as goldbugs erroneously think. I guess, in a way he wants to see what the countries assets are in case of calamity.
September 9, 2010 at 7:02 AM #602588ArrayaParticipant[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=Arraya][quote=urbanrealtor]
My questions is this:
Since we don’t currently have a gold or silver standard, what is the importance of gold in long term government storage?I am not arguing. Its a serious question and I would like to hear actual views on it.[/quote]
Well, it’s kind of a silly question. It’s like saying since I am not currently in Europe, what does it matter if my suitcase full of Euros is still in my safety deposit box.
RP is just anticipating a forced relocation to Europe and wants to know what we are working with[/quote]
No.
I go to Europe a lot so that would matter to me more.
This is a bit…more…disconnected from me.
But to recap, the concern is that we will need the gold shortly?
What would be the circumstances for needing it?[/quote]I think it would matter a little bit if your money went missing.
Ok, let me put it another way. Simply, he thinks, it is, possibly, not there, as in, missing, stolen, etc… Which given the revolving door of criminals through out the decades of financial officialdom, is not completely insane. Second, he sees the inevitable collapse and loss of confidence of our monetary system, as they all do, eventually. Failures, crises and collapses are built into monetary systems. Gold really does not fix that, though as goldbugs erroneously think. I guess, in a way he wants to see what the countries assets are in case of calamity.
September 9, 2010 at 7:02 AM #602499ArrayaParticipant[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=Arraya][quote=urbanrealtor]
My questions is this:
Since we don’t currently have a gold or silver standard, what is the importance of gold in long term government storage?I am not arguing. Its a serious question and I would like to hear actual views on it.[/quote]
Well, it’s kind of a silly question. It’s like saying since I am not currently in Europe, what does it matter if my suitcase full of Euros is still in my safety deposit box.
RP is just anticipating a forced relocation to Europe and wants to know what we are working with[/quote]
No.
I go to Europe a lot so that would matter to me more.
This is a bit…more…disconnected from me.
But to recap, the concern is that we will need the gold shortly?
What would be the circumstances for needing it?[/quote]I think it would matter a little bit if your money went missing.
Ok, let me put it another way. Simply, he thinks, it is, possibly, not there, as in, missing, stolen, etc… Which given the revolving door of criminals through out the decades of financial officialdom, is not completely insane. Second, he sees the inevitable collapse and loss of confidence of our monetary system, as they all do, eventually. Failures, crises and collapses are built into monetary systems. Gold really does not fix that, though as goldbugs erroneously think. I guess, in a way he wants to see what the countries assets are in case of calamity.
September 9, 2010 at 7:22 AM #602593blahblahblahParticipant[quote=urbanrealtor]I know the usual libertarian tropes about precious metal standards and I am not interested in that discussion now.
My questions is this:
Since we don’t currently have a gold or silver standard, what is the importance of gold in long term government storage?I am not arguing. Its a serious question and I would like to hear actual views on it.[/quote]
Maybe since it was paid for by the people, the people should know whether it is still there or not. I know that sounds crazy and all, but I think that’s the gist of it.
September 9, 2010 at 7:22 AM #603247blahblahblahParticipant[quote=urbanrealtor]I know the usual libertarian tropes about precious metal standards and I am not interested in that discussion now.
My questions is this:
Since we don’t currently have a gold or silver standard, what is the importance of gold in long term government storage?I am not arguing. Its a serious question and I would like to hear actual views on it.[/quote]
Maybe since it was paid for by the people, the people should know whether it is still there or not. I know that sounds crazy and all, but I think that’s the gist of it.
September 9, 2010 at 7:22 AM #603141blahblahblahParticipant[quote=urbanrealtor]I know the usual libertarian tropes about precious metal standards and I am not interested in that discussion now.
My questions is this:
Since we don’t currently have a gold or silver standard, what is the importance of gold in long term government storage?I am not arguing. Its a serious question and I would like to hear actual views on it.[/quote]
Maybe since it was paid for by the people, the people should know whether it is still there or not. I know that sounds crazy and all, but I think that’s the gist of it.
September 9, 2010 at 7:22 AM #603565blahblahblahParticipant[quote=urbanrealtor]I know the usual libertarian tropes about precious metal standards and I am not interested in that discussion now.
My questions is this:
Since we don’t currently have a gold or silver standard, what is the importance of gold in long term government storage?I am not arguing. Its a serious question and I would like to hear actual views on it.[/quote]
Maybe since it was paid for by the people, the people should know whether it is still there or not. I know that sounds crazy and all, but I think that’s the gist of it.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.