Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › G.M. and Chrysler Explore Merger
- This topic has 70 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by
CAwireman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 11, 2008 at 2:45 PM #285728October 11, 2008 at 4:50 PM #285788
CA renter
ParticipantWe also used to value quality workmanship. Remember when things were built to last — houses, TVs, vacuum cleaners, stereos, clothes, cars, etc.?
Somehow, we got brainwashed into thinking “cheap” things were to our benefit. You hear it all the time about how globalization is good because now we can buy a shirt for $2.00 instead of $20.00. What they don’t mention is that the $20.00 shirt lasts 10X as long, and that people who spend $20.00 on a shirt are more likely to take care of it than someone who only spent $2.00. Think of the ramifications WRT pollution, too.
How many TV/electronic repair shops are still around? How many shoe repair shops? We’ve been convinced to simply throw our “cheap” things away and replace them with new things because this is what’s been behind our economic “growth” for so many years. It often costs more to repair something than to fix it. And every year executives are expected to “grow” thier companies, so they fake it by focusing on quantity over quality.
Today, we are drowning in cheap, toxic, plastic stuff from China.
I would love to see an end to cheap materialism and a return to good-quality American production and conservative consumption.
October 11, 2008 at 4:50 PM #286080CA renter
ParticipantWe also used to value quality workmanship. Remember when things were built to last — houses, TVs, vacuum cleaners, stereos, clothes, cars, etc.?
Somehow, we got brainwashed into thinking “cheap” things were to our benefit. You hear it all the time about how globalization is good because now we can buy a shirt for $2.00 instead of $20.00. What they don’t mention is that the $20.00 shirt lasts 10X as long, and that people who spend $20.00 on a shirt are more likely to take care of it than someone who only spent $2.00. Think of the ramifications WRT pollution, too.
How many TV/electronic repair shops are still around? How many shoe repair shops? We’ve been convinced to simply throw our “cheap” things away and replace them with new things because this is what’s been behind our economic “growth” for so many years. It often costs more to repair something than to fix it. And every year executives are expected to “grow” thier companies, so they fake it by focusing on quantity over quality.
Today, we are drowning in cheap, toxic, plastic stuff from China.
I would love to see an end to cheap materialism and a return to good-quality American production and conservative consumption.
October 11, 2008 at 4:50 PM #286101CA renter
ParticipantWe also used to value quality workmanship. Remember when things were built to last — houses, TVs, vacuum cleaners, stereos, clothes, cars, etc.?
Somehow, we got brainwashed into thinking “cheap” things were to our benefit. You hear it all the time about how globalization is good because now we can buy a shirt for $2.00 instead of $20.00. What they don’t mention is that the $20.00 shirt lasts 10X as long, and that people who spend $20.00 on a shirt are more likely to take care of it than someone who only spent $2.00. Think of the ramifications WRT pollution, too.
How many TV/electronic repair shops are still around? How many shoe repair shops? We’ve been convinced to simply throw our “cheap” things away and replace them with new things because this is what’s been behind our economic “growth” for so many years. It often costs more to repair something than to fix it. And every year executives are expected to “grow” thier companies, so they fake it by focusing on quantity over quality.
Today, we are drowning in cheap, toxic, plastic stuff from China.
I would love to see an end to cheap materialism and a return to good-quality American production and conservative consumption.
October 11, 2008 at 4:50 PM #286124CA renter
ParticipantWe also used to value quality workmanship. Remember when things were built to last — houses, TVs, vacuum cleaners, stereos, clothes, cars, etc.?
Somehow, we got brainwashed into thinking “cheap” things were to our benefit. You hear it all the time about how globalization is good because now we can buy a shirt for $2.00 instead of $20.00. What they don’t mention is that the $20.00 shirt lasts 10X as long, and that people who spend $20.00 on a shirt are more likely to take care of it than someone who only spent $2.00. Think of the ramifications WRT pollution, too.
How many TV/electronic repair shops are still around? How many shoe repair shops? We’ve been convinced to simply throw our “cheap” things away and replace them with new things because this is what’s been behind our economic “growth” for so many years. It often costs more to repair something than to fix it. And every year executives are expected to “grow” thier companies, so they fake it by focusing on quantity over quality.
Today, we are drowning in cheap, toxic, plastic stuff from China.
I would love to see an end to cheap materialism and a return to good-quality American production and conservative consumption.
October 11, 2008 at 4:50 PM #286132CA renter
ParticipantWe also used to value quality workmanship. Remember when things were built to last — houses, TVs, vacuum cleaners, stereos, clothes, cars, etc.?
Somehow, we got brainwashed into thinking “cheap” things were to our benefit. You hear it all the time about how globalization is good because now we can buy a shirt for $2.00 instead of $20.00. What they don’t mention is that the $20.00 shirt lasts 10X as long, and that people who spend $20.00 on a shirt are more likely to take care of it than someone who only spent $2.00. Think of the ramifications WRT pollution, too.
How many TV/electronic repair shops are still around? How many shoe repair shops? We’ve been convinced to simply throw our “cheap” things away and replace them with new things because this is what’s been behind our economic “growth” for so many years. It often costs more to repair something than to fix it. And every year executives are expected to “grow” thier companies, so they fake it by focusing on quantity over quality.
Today, we are drowning in cheap, toxic, plastic stuff from China.
I would love to see an end to cheap materialism and a return to good-quality American production and conservative consumption.
October 11, 2008 at 7:45 PM #286315CAwireman
ParticipantAbsolutely, quality is an issue. I don’t know that I’d buy another US manufacturer’s car (the last one we purchased was from a Japanese manufacturer despite wanting to buy American.)
US auto’s break down too much. For something that costs $25 to $75 thousand dollars, you’d think that if you take care of it, it should last 10 to 15 years, no problems.
Haven’t owned European cars, so I can’t comment.
I don’t recall where I heard this, but someone mentioned that they believe that automobiles will begin to drop in price. I could easily see that happening. Car dealers chasing less wealthly consumers.
October 11, 2008 at 7:45 PM #286309CAwireman
ParticipantAbsolutely, quality is an issue. I don’t know that I’d buy another US manufacturer’s car (the last one we purchased was from a Japanese manufacturer despite wanting to buy American.)
US auto’s break down too much. For something that costs $25 to $75 thousand dollars, you’d think that if you take care of it, it should last 10 to 15 years, no problems.
Haven’t owned European cars, so I can’t comment.
I don’t recall where I heard this, but someone mentioned that they believe that automobiles will begin to drop in price. I could easily see that happening. Car dealers chasing less wealthly consumers.
October 11, 2008 at 7:45 PM #285973CAwireman
ParticipantAbsolutely, quality is an issue. I don’t know that I’d buy another US manufacturer’s car (the last one we purchased was from a Japanese manufacturer despite wanting to buy American.)
US auto’s break down too much. For something that costs $25 to $75 thousand dollars, you’d think that if you take care of it, it should last 10 to 15 years, no problems.
Haven’t owned European cars, so I can’t comment.
I don’t recall where I heard this, but someone mentioned that they believe that automobiles will begin to drop in price. I could easily see that happening. Car dealers chasing less wealthly consumers.
October 11, 2008 at 7:45 PM #286267CAwireman
ParticipantAbsolutely, quality is an issue. I don’t know that I’d buy another US manufacturer’s car (the last one we purchased was from a Japanese manufacturer despite wanting to buy American.)
US auto’s break down too much. For something that costs $25 to $75 thousand dollars, you’d think that if you take care of it, it should last 10 to 15 years, no problems.
Haven’t owned European cars, so I can’t comment.
I don’t recall where I heard this, but someone mentioned that they believe that automobiles will begin to drop in price. I could easily see that happening. Car dealers chasing less wealthly consumers.
October 11, 2008 at 7:45 PM #286287CAwireman
ParticipantAbsolutely, quality is an issue. I don’t know that I’d buy another US manufacturer’s car (the last one we purchased was from a Japanese manufacturer despite wanting to buy American.)
US auto’s break down too much. For something that costs $25 to $75 thousand dollars, you’d think that if you take care of it, it should last 10 to 15 years, no problems.
Haven’t owned European cars, so I can’t comment.
I don’t recall where I heard this, but someone mentioned that they believe that automobiles will begin to drop in price. I could easily see that happening. Car dealers chasing less wealthly consumers.
October 11, 2008 at 7:48 PM #286319HereWeGo
ParticipantI like the synergies of this merger … one bankruptcy is much more efficient than two bankruptcies.
October 11, 2008 at 7:48 PM #286324HereWeGo
ParticipantI like the synergies of this merger … one bankruptcy is much more efficient than two bankruptcies.
October 11, 2008 at 7:48 PM #286297HereWeGo
ParticipantI like the synergies of this merger … one bankruptcy is much more efficient than two bankruptcies.
October 11, 2008 at 7:48 PM #286277HereWeGo
ParticipantI like the synergies of this merger … one bankruptcy is much more efficient than two bankruptcies.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.