Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Ghetto & Gentrification
- This topic has 36 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by spdrun.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 2, 2016 at 12:22 AM #22173November 2, 2016 at 9:29 AM #802960HLSParticipant
Discussing tenants by using terms such as
White, Black and Latino is a blatant violation of Federal Law
and if anybody ever heard you utter them, you could get sued and lose everything that you own. Good luck defending yourself.Now that you are on the board of the HOA, your racism & prejudicial remarks could bring down the entire association.
I hope they have really good insurance.On March 28, 2014, the U.S. Department of Justice published a notice increasing the civil monetary penalties for violations of the Fair Housing Act. Under the new rule, which applies to violations that occur on or after April 28, 2014, the maximum civil penalty for a first violation has increased from $55,000 to $75,000, and for subsequent violations the new maximum is $150,000.
http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_opp/FHLaws
November 2, 2016 at 9:35 AM #802961NotCrankyParticipantI ‘d never own a rental unit I wouldn’t find acceptable to live in myself.
November 2, 2016 at 9:39 AM #802962spdrunParticipantSeems like FIH hates all of the ethnicities in his complex equally.
As far as other trashy tenants, who cares as long as you’re getting good rent? If anything, they drive down sale prices so you (FIH) can buy more units in the complex. Win.
November 2, 2016 at 9:48 AM #802963PCinSDGuest[quote=HLS]Discussing tenants by using terms such as
White, Black and Latino is a blatant violation of Federal Law
and if anybody ever heard you utter them, you could get sued and lose everything that you own. Good luck defending yourself.Now that you are on the board of the HOA, your racism & prejudicial remarks could bring down the entire association.
I hope they have really good insurance.On March 28, 2014, the U.S. Department of Justice published a notice increasing the civil monetary penalties for violations of the Fair Housing Act. Under the new rule, which applies to violations that occur on or after April 28, 2014, the maximum civil penalty for a first violation has increased from $55,000 to $75,000, and for subsequent violations the new maximum is $150,000.
http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_opp/FHLaws%5B/quote%5D
In case you haven’t noticed, FIH has always posted overtly racist comments here. This comment is tame compared to some of his other ones. And, he would never, under any circumstances, consider the rental application of a black or Hispanic prospective tenant.
November 2, 2016 at 9:52 AM #802964spdrunParticipantWhich is funny, because he claims to be out to make money. Moral considerations aside, money is all the same color.
November 2, 2016 at 10:07 AM #802965HLSParticipantFreedom of speech allows him to say whatever he wants.
However, the slightest hint of discrimination when
it comes to renting/selling property could cost him everything that he owns.I know he’s an expert in almost everything and would never pay anyone to do anything, so hearing what the judge would say about his
racism would be interesting (especially if it were a ‘Black’ or ‘Latino’ judge) when he represents himself.November 2, 2016 at 10:23 AM #802966FlyerInHiGuestJust observations on the demographics of neighborhood.
Nothing to do when tenant screening. I screen tenants of all kinds very well. BTW, we never talk about any individual resident in terms of race.The problem many owners are desperate for money and will rent to anyone. And when units are in bad condition, the tenant pool is much smaller.
November 2, 2016 at 10:53 AM #802967FlyerInHiGuest[quote=spdrun]Which is funny, because he claims to be out to make money. Moral considerations aside, money is all the same color.[/quote]
I agree, money is green.
That’s why I support immigration reform and a diverse business environment with all kinds of people
The critiria I have are simple. No race involved.
No criminal record
No eviction
Verifiable income by employer via business fax or phone. Copy of paystub not good enough
Move in at beginning of month. No desperate immediate move-inNovember 2, 2016 at 11:48 AM #802970millennialParticipantI have invested in areas such as the one you mention for the same exact reasons. In fact it sounds very similar in terms of avg. rent; except the property is located just north of downtown Phoenix and the purchase for the whole multifamily complex. I did it this way to avoid some of the problems you are currently having; and would advise going that route if possible.
November 2, 2016 at 12:01 PM #802971FlyerInHiGuestMillennial, i was looking for a multiunit but those are impossible to find in a decent area.
There are many multi units but on deplorable streets full of other multi units so there would be spillover problems.I believe in gentrification of older centrally located areas. But it’s hard to get owners on board. Some landlords are so cheap they won’t replace water valves until there are leaks. They don’t do any maintenance.
November 2, 2016 at 12:23 PM #802973millennialParticipant[quote=FlyerInHi]Millennial, i was looking for a multiunit but those are impossible to find in a decent area.
There are many multi units but on deplorable streets full of other multi units so there would be spillover problems.I believe in gentrification of older centrally located areas. But it’s hard to get owners on board. Some landlords are so cheap they won’t replace water valves until there are leaks. They don’t do any maintenance.[/quote]
It sounds like you have a problem, but it also sounds like that many on the HOA board will agree to some maintenance improvements. What’s the ratio of rent vs. own in the complex? I think many owners would be OK with increase monthly HOA dues to improve the value of their property and if you can sell the idea to landlords that improved property/amenities = higher rents you will get their vote as well. I haven’t invested in Nevada before so don’t know if their is rent control, but you could try and increase rents to not only cover maintenance CAPEX but also some discretionary CAPEX and attract those that would appreciate the improved amenities and grounds. Typically those that appreciate their home will treat it nice as well.
November 2, 2016 at 2:54 PM #802978spdrunParticipantIf I were holding to rent and not looking to flip, I’d keep my mouth shut, keep ahead of whatever structural issues the complex has, and not bother much getting the place prettified. Uglier complex = lower sale prices, for you to buy more condos. And really, if the location is the same, it doesn’t make much difference in rents.
November 2, 2016 at 5:10 PM #802983flyerParticipantAgree with sp. As long as you are able to find good tenants, you should be fine, and, hopefully, if you do sell, you’ll find a buyer who sees the same potential.
A few of our single and multi-family properties here and in other states, although not in “ghetto” or “deplorable” areas, they are in older, high demand areas.
We’ve always been happy with the returns, and have never had any issues we couldn’t handle, so things might work out better than you think. In your case, getting the HOA on board is key.
November 2, 2016 at 8:56 PM #802988FlyerInHiGuest[quote=spdrun]If I were holding to rent and not looking to flip, I’d keep my mouth shut, keep ahead of whatever structural issues the complex has, and not bother much getting the place prettified. Uglier complex = lower sale prices, for you to buy more condos. And really, if the location is the same, it doesn’t make much difference in rents.[/quote]
I think you’re right. But I’m a perfectionist and expect everyone to live up my expectations. I put effort into fixing up my rentals and I want professionals in them.
The other owners just want the cash flow. They don’t know how to be their own general contractors and they can’t afford $15 to $30k to remodel. I’m just the new blood wanting to change things.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.