Founder Of Reaganomics Says That “Without A Revolution, Americans Are History”

[blahblahblah]

In summary:

* Poor Americans aren’t really poor because there are people dying of disease and malnutrition somewhere else. Since they are better off than these people, they really have nothing to complain about.

* Poor Americans aren’t actually poor because a hundred years ago poor people couldn’t have a TV or a flush commode. Poor Americans now have both! They’re rich! What a bunch of whiners.

* There is no poverty in America. I certainly don’t see any on my commute between Encinitas and Sorrento Valley.

* Poor Americans are greedy and want free houses in Encinitas without working. Therefore all American jobs deserve to be shipped to China. Except for mine of course, Chinese people aren’t smart enough to be a (choose one) financial adviser/tax accountant/day trader/middle manager/real estate agent.

* Globalization is helping poor people in places like China by giving them jobs with no worker protection, safety, or environmental standards.

* Globalization is unstoppable and Americans are addicted to cheap goods so we must continue on our current course. What we need is more outsourcing, more movement of capital out of the US so that we can continue importing cheap furniture and cheap TVs. We’re addicted to this stuff! Everyone knows that the cure for addiction is to simply have more of whatever it is you’re addicted to.

* Anyone who uses the word “deserve” or “fair” in their argument is childish, since only children use these words. Children like Benjamin Franklin – “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety” or Eleanor Roosevelt – “It is not fair to ask of others what you are not willing to do yourself. ”

[briansd1]

hahaha, that was pretty funny CONCHO.

Everyone here knows that I’m a social liberal who is all for directing financial assistance to the poorest Americans.

Unfortunately, during this financial crisis, the government is not cutting administrative costs and salaries. The government is eliminating social benefits to the poorest.

That’s a policy problem that has nothing to do with globalization. Blaming globalization and foreigners won’t get you anywhere. Focus on the policies.

[briansd1]

hahaha, that was pretty funny CONCHO.

Everyone here knows that I’m a social liberal who is all for directing financial assistance to the poorest Americans.

Unfortunately, during this financial crisis, the government is not cutting administrative costs and salaries. The government is eliminating social benefits to the poorest.

That’s a policy problem that has nothing to do with globalization. Blaming globalization and foreigners won’t get you anywhere. Focus on the policies.

[briansd1]

hahaha, that was pretty funny CONCHO.

Everyone here knows that I’m a social liberal who is all for directing financial assistance to the poorest Americans.

Unfortunately, during this financial crisis, the government is not cutting administrative costs and salaries. The government is eliminating social benefits to the poorest.

That’s a policy problem that has nothing to do with globalization. Blaming globalization and foreigners won’t get you anywhere. Focus on the policies.

[briansd1]

hahaha, that was pretty funny CONCHO.

Everyone here knows that I’m a social liberal who is all for directing financial assistance to the poorest Americans.

Unfortunately, during this financial crisis, the government is not cutting administrative costs and salaries. The government is eliminating social benefits to the poorest.

That’s a policy problem that has nothing to do with globalization. Blaming globalization and foreigners won’t get you anywhere. Focus on the policies.

[briansd1]

hahaha, that was pretty funny CONCHO.

Everyone here knows that I’m a social liberal who is all for directing financial assistance to the poorest Americans.

Unfortunately, during this financial crisis, the government is not cutting administrative costs and salaries. The government is eliminating social benefits to the poorest.

That’s a policy problem that has nothing to do with globalization. Blaming globalization and foreigners won’t get you anywhere. Focus on the policies.

[blahblahblah]

[quote=briansd1]
That’s a policy problem that has nothing to do with globalization. Blaming globalization and foreigners won’t get you anywhere. Focus on the policies.[/quote]

Excellent! I had forgotten that one, let’s add it to the list:

* If you don’t support policies which make it favorable for US companies to move jobs abroad where there are fewer worker’s rights, lower safety standards, and fewer environmental protections, you are “blaming foreigners”!

Nice one. That will pretty much put a stop to any debate and we can “win” at that point. No one wants to be accused of “blaming foreigners!” Heh heh heh we win.

[blahblahblah]

[quote=briansd1]
That’s a policy problem that has nothing to do with globalization. Blaming globalization and foreigners won’t get you anywhere. Focus on the policies.[/quote]

Excellent! I had forgotten that one, let’s add it to the list:

* If you don’t support policies which make it favorable for US companies to move jobs abroad where there are fewer worker’s rights, lower safety standards, and fewer environmental protections, you are “blaming foreigners”!

Nice one. That will pretty much put a stop to any debate and we can “win” at that point. No one wants to be accused of “blaming foreigners!” Heh heh heh we win.

[blahblahblah]

[quote=briansd1]
That’s a policy problem that has nothing to do with globalization. Blaming globalization and foreigners won’t get you anywhere. Focus on the policies.[/quote]

Excellent! I had forgotten that one, let’s add it to the list:

* If you don’t support policies which make it favorable for US companies to move jobs abroad where there are fewer worker’s rights, lower safety standards, and fewer environmental protections, you are “blaming foreigners”!

Nice one. That will pretty much put a stop to any debate and we can “win” at that point. No one wants to be accused of “blaming foreigners!” Heh heh heh we win.

[blahblahblah]

[quote=briansd1]
That’s a policy problem that has nothing to do with globalization. Blaming globalization and foreigners won’t get you anywhere. Focus on the policies.[/quote]

Excellent! I had forgotten that one, let’s add it to the list:

* If you don’t support policies which make it favorable for US companies to move jobs abroad where there are fewer worker’s rights, lower safety standards, and fewer environmental protections, you are “blaming foreigners”!

Nice one. That will pretty much put a stop to any debate and we can “win” at that point. No one wants to be accused of “blaming foreigners!” Heh heh heh we win.

[blahblahblah]

[quote=briansd1]
That’s a policy problem that has nothing to do with globalization. Blaming globalization and foreigners won’t get you anywhere. Focus on the policies.[/quote]

Excellent! I had forgotten that one, let’s add it to the list:

* If you don’t support policies which make it favorable for US companies to move jobs abroad where there are fewer worker’s rights, lower safety standards, and fewer environmental protections, you are “blaming foreigners”!

Nice one. That will pretty much put a stop to any debate and we can “win” at that point. No one wants to be accused of “blaming foreigners!” Heh heh heh we win.

[briansd1]

[quote=CONCHO]
* If you don’t support policies which make it favorable for US companies to move jobs abroad where there are fewer worker’s rights, lower safety standards, and fewer environmental protections, you are “blaming foreigners”!
[/quote]

hahaha… US companies are not exactly US companies. They are owned by investors from around the world.

In a globalized world, if a US company does not participate in a market, foreign companies will.

Remember that in America, companies moved jobs from North to South to West. They created new markets and new wealth in the process. The same principle applies in a globalizing world.

[briansd1]

[quote=CONCHO]
* If you don’t support policies which make it favorable for US companies to move jobs abroad where there are fewer worker’s rights, lower safety standards, and fewer environmental protections, you are “blaming foreigners”!
[/quote]

hahaha… US companies are not exactly US companies. They are owned by investors from around the world.

In a globalized world, if a US company does not participate in a market, foreign companies will.

Remember that in America, companies moved jobs from North to South to West. They created new markets and new wealth in the process. The same principle applies in a globalizing world.

[briansd1]

[quote=CONCHO]
* If you don’t support policies which make it favorable for US companies to move jobs abroad where there are fewer worker’s rights, lower safety standards, and fewer environmental protections, you are “blaming foreigners”!
[/quote]

hahaha… US companies are not exactly US companies. They are owned by investors from around the world.

In a globalized world, if a US company does not participate in a market, foreign companies will.

Remember that in America, companies moved jobs from North to South to West. They created new markets and new wealth in the process. The same principle applies in a globalizing world.

[briansd1]

[quote=CONCHO]
* If you don’t support policies which make it favorable for US companies to move jobs abroad where there are fewer worker’s rights, lower safety standards, and fewer environmental protections, you are “blaming foreigners”!
[/quote]

hahaha… US companies are not exactly US companies. They are owned by investors from around the world.

In a globalized world, if a US company does not participate in a market, foreign companies will.

Remember that in America, companies moved jobs from North to South to West. They created new markets and new wealth in the process. The same principle applies in a globalizing world.

[Author]

Posts