Menu

Home › Forums › Housing › Feds Announce Plan to Delay Foreclosures

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 61 total)
1 2 3 4 5
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 12, 2008 at 2:49 PM #152286
    Bugs
    Participant

    Inasmuch as a lot of the lenders are so swamped it already takes them twice as long to foreclose as the law allows for, “adding” an extra 30-day buffer to the minimums will not have any noticeable affect on either the number of foreclosures or the length of time it takes a lender to do one.

    What do you get if you put a monkey in a silver suit?

    February 12, 2008 at 2:49 PM #152562
    kewp
    Participant

    The Republicans changed bankruptcy law to make it harder get out from under debt at the same time Americans were taking on insane debt loads.

    Mind you, I have *zero* sympathy for Joe Six-Pack that owes 500k on his 200k mexican prison. Especially if he *voted* for Bush!

    February 12, 2008 at 2:49 PM #152566
    kewp
    Participant

    The Republicans changed bankruptcy law to make it harder get out from under debt at the same time Americans were taking on insane debt loads.

    Mind you, I have *zero* sympathy for Joe Six-Pack that owes 500k on his 200k mexican prison. Especially if he *voted* for Bush!

    February 12, 2008 at 2:49 PM #152588
    kewp
    Participant

    The Republicans changed bankruptcy law to make it harder get out from under debt at the same time Americans were taking on insane debt loads.

    Mind you, I have *zero* sympathy for Joe Six-Pack that owes 500k on his 200k mexican prison. Especially if he *voted* for Bush!

    February 12, 2008 at 2:49 PM #152291
    kewp
    Participant

    The Republicans changed bankruptcy law to make it harder get out from under debt at the same time Americans were taking on insane debt loads.

    Mind you, I have *zero* sympathy for Joe Six-Pack that owes 500k on his 200k mexican prison. Especially if he *voted* for Bush!

    February 12, 2008 at 2:49 PM #152668
    kewp
    Participant

    The Republicans changed bankruptcy law to make it harder get out from under debt at the same time Americans were taking on insane debt loads.

    Mind you, I have *zero* sympathy for Joe Six-Pack that owes 500k on his 200k mexican prison. Especially if he *voted* for Bush!

    February 12, 2008 at 6:39 PM #152685
    bobby
    Participant

    “Why should the guy who can’t afford his home be ableto re-negotiate the terms of his loan when the guy who can afford his home and pays on time isn’t?”
    b/c life is not fair.
    but I don’t care who loses, as long as it’s not the tax payers. Banks or FBs can lose their shirt, matters not to me.

    February 12, 2008 at 6:39 PM #152758
    bobby
    Participant

    “Why should the guy who can’t afford his home be ableto re-negotiate the terms of his loan when the guy who can afford his home and pays on time isn’t?”
    b/c life is not fair.
    but I don’t care who loses, as long as it’s not the tax payers. Banks or FBs can lose their shirt, matters not to me.

    February 12, 2008 at 6:39 PM #152380
    bobby
    Participant

    “Why should the guy who can’t afford his home be ableto re-negotiate the terms of his loan when the guy who can afford his home and pays on time isn’t?”
    b/c life is not fair.
    but I don’t care who loses, as long as it’s not the tax payers. Banks or FBs can lose their shirt, matters not to me.

    February 12, 2008 at 6:39 PM #152660
    bobby
    Participant

    “Why should the guy who can’t afford his home be ableto re-negotiate the terms of his loan when the guy who can afford his home and pays on time isn’t?”
    b/c life is not fair.
    but I don’t care who loses, as long as it’s not the tax payers. Banks or FBs can lose their shirt, matters not to me.

    February 12, 2008 at 6:39 PM #152655
    bobby
    Participant

    “Why should the guy who can’t afford his home be ableto re-negotiate the terms of his loan when the guy who can afford his home and pays on time isn’t?”
    b/c life is not fair.
    but I don’t care who loses, as long as it’s not the tax payers. Banks or FBs can lose their shirt, matters not to me.

    February 12, 2008 at 7:58 PM #152692
    drunkle
    Participant

    “Inasmuch as a lot of the lenders are so swamped it already takes them twice as long to foreclose as the law allows for”

    heh, exactly. i was thinking that the bankers heard the proposal, shrugged and said sure, why not.

    February 12, 2008 at 7:58 PM #152696
    drunkle
    Participant

    “Inasmuch as a lot of the lenders are so swamped it already takes them twice as long to foreclose as the law allows for”

    heh, exactly. i was thinking that the bankers heard the proposal, shrugged and said sure, why not.

    February 12, 2008 at 7:58 PM #152720
    drunkle
    Participant

    “Inasmuch as a lot of the lenders are so swamped it already takes them twice as long to foreclose as the law allows for”

    heh, exactly. i was thinking that the bankers heard the proposal, shrugged and said sure, why not.

    February 12, 2008 at 7:58 PM #152415
    drunkle
    Participant

    “Inasmuch as a lot of the lenders are so swamped it already takes them twice as long to foreclose as the law allows for”

    heh, exactly. i was thinking that the bankers heard the proposal, shrugged and said sure, why not.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 61 total)
1 2 3 4 5
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.