Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Fed cuts .5% yet again…
- This topic has 255 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by lendingbubblecontinues.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 30, 2008 at 10:44 PM #146071January 30, 2008 at 11:03 PM #145732patientlywaitingParticipant
I personally like slow growth times. I did well in the early to mid 1990s. In those times, only the very best succeed.
Due to my conservative nature, I don’t like boom times where the tides lift all boats.
For example, I would never offer on a house upon first viewing. In my opinion, people who bought sight unseen and made money did not deserve it. They just got lucky.
The dot.com boom was just ludicrous. It was all hype. And so was the Y2K deal. I knew nothing would happen and nothing did. BTW, the Fed injected massive liquidity into the banking system to avoid a crash at that time. And every tech firm was hawking Y2K consulting. I resisted a much as I could but had to spend money to “insure” against the Y2K bug. Ridiculous! What was wrong with shutting down the computers for one day a taking a day off?
I’ve come to beleive that all the “new paradigms” are marketing hypes that end up in big crashes.
I’m all for a hard recession to reset our national priorities. Let’s get back to sustainable growth based on real productivity. Vaporware needs to die once and for all.
And, yes, let’s slash government spending. The bureaucrats got fat and lazy during the good times also. Public spending needs to be re-adjusted to provide real value.
Personally, I’ve got nothing to worry about. I’ve got no debt and hardly any expenses. I’m not boasting here. But it’s about time that financially responsible folks got some recognition in this country.
January 30, 2008 at 11:03 PM #145974patientlywaitingParticipantI personally like slow growth times. I did well in the early to mid 1990s. In those times, only the very best succeed.
Due to my conservative nature, I don’t like boom times where the tides lift all boats.
For example, I would never offer on a house upon first viewing. In my opinion, people who bought sight unseen and made money did not deserve it. They just got lucky.
The dot.com boom was just ludicrous. It was all hype. And so was the Y2K deal. I knew nothing would happen and nothing did. BTW, the Fed injected massive liquidity into the banking system to avoid a crash at that time. And every tech firm was hawking Y2K consulting. I resisted a much as I could but had to spend money to “insure” against the Y2K bug. Ridiculous! What was wrong with shutting down the computers for one day a taking a day off?
I’ve come to beleive that all the “new paradigms” are marketing hypes that end up in big crashes.
I’m all for a hard recession to reset our national priorities. Let’s get back to sustainable growth based on real productivity. Vaporware needs to die once and for all.
And, yes, let’s slash government spending. The bureaucrats got fat and lazy during the good times also. Public spending needs to be re-adjusted to provide real value.
Personally, I’ve got nothing to worry about. I’ve got no debt and hardly any expenses. I’m not boasting here. But it’s about time that financially responsible folks got some recognition in this country.
January 30, 2008 at 11:03 PM #146006patientlywaitingParticipantI personally like slow growth times. I did well in the early to mid 1990s. In those times, only the very best succeed.
Due to my conservative nature, I don’t like boom times where the tides lift all boats.
For example, I would never offer on a house upon first viewing. In my opinion, people who bought sight unseen and made money did not deserve it. They just got lucky.
The dot.com boom was just ludicrous. It was all hype. And so was the Y2K deal. I knew nothing would happen and nothing did. BTW, the Fed injected massive liquidity into the banking system to avoid a crash at that time. And every tech firm was hawking Y2K consulting. I resisted a much as I could but had to spend money to “insure” against the Y2K bug. Ridiculous! What was wrong with shutting down the computers for one day a taking a day off?
I’ve come to beleive that all the “new paradigms” are marketing hypes that end up in big crashes.
I’m all for a hard recession to reset our national priorities. Let’s get back to sustainable growth based on real productivity. Vaporware needs to die once and for all.
And, yes, let’s slash government spending. The bureaucrats got fat and lazy during the good times also. Public spending needs to be re-adjusted to provide real value.
Personally, I’ve got nothing to worry about. I’ve got no debt and hardly any expenses. I’m not boasting here. But it’s about time that financially responsible folks got some recognition in this country.
January 30, 2008 at 11:03 PM #146014patientlywaitingParticipantI personally like slow growth times. I did well in the early to mid 1990s. In those times, only the very best succeed.
Due to my conservative nature, I don’t like boom times where the tides lift all boats.
For example, I would never offer on a house upon first viewing. In my opinion, people who bought sight unseen and made money did not deserve it. They just got lucky.
The dot.com boom was just ludicrous. It was all hype. And so was the Y2K deal. I knew nothing would happen and nothing did. BTW, the Fed injected massive liquidity into the banking system to avoid a crash at that time. And every tech firm was hawking Y2K consulting. I resisted a much as I could but had to spend money to “insure” against the Y2K bug. Ridiculous! What was wrong with shutting down the computers for one day a taking a day off?
I’ve come to beleive that all the “new paradigms” are marketing hypes that end up in big crashes.
I’m all for a hard recession to reset our national priorities. Let’s get back to sustainable growth based on real productivity. Vaporware needs to die once and for all.
And, yes, let’s slash government spending. The bureaucrats got fat and lazy during the good times also. Public spending needs to be re-adjusted to provide real value.
Personally, I’ve got nothing to worry about. I’ve got no debt and hardly any expenses. I’m not boasting here. But it’s about time that financially responsible folks got some recognition in this country.
January 30, 2008 at 11:03 PM #146076patientlywaitingParticipantI personally like slow growth times. I did well in the early to mid 1990s. In those times, only the very best succeed.
Due to my conservative nature, I don’t like boom times where the tides lift all boats.
For example, I would never offer on a house upon first viewing. In my opinion, people who bought sight unseen and made money did not deserve it. They just got lucky.
The dot.com boom was just ludicrous. It was all hype. And so was the Y2K deal. I knew nothing would happen and nothing did. BTW, the Fed injected massive liquidity into the banking system to avoid a crash at that time. And every tech firm was hawking Y2K consulting. I resisted a much as I could but had to spend money to “insure” against the Y2K bug. Ridiculous! What was wrong with shutting down the computers for one day a taking a day off?
I’ve come to beleive that all the “new paradigms” are marketing hypes that end up in big crashes.
I’m all for a hard recession to reset our national priorities. Let’s get back to sustainable growth based on real productivity. Vaporware needs to die once and for all.
And, yes, let’s slash government spending. The bureaucrats got fat and lazy during the good times also. Public spending needs to be re-adjusted to provide real value.
Personally, I’ve got nothing to worry about. I’ve got no debt and hardly any expenses. I’m not boasting here. But it’s about time that financially responsible folks got some recognition in this country.
January 30, 2008 at 11:24 PM #145752CoronitaParticipantpatientlywaiting,
With all due respect, mind if I ask what you or your business does that would allow you to do well in slow economies but not "even better" in good economy?
I can think of a few businesses that would be this case, like repo/auction houses, collection agencies perhaps. But what specifically do you do that allows you to be "better" off in a downturn economy?
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
January 30, 2008 at 11:24 PM #145995CoronitaParticipantpatientlywaiting,
With all due respect, mind if I ask what you or your business does that would allow you to do well in slow economies but not "even better" in good economy?
I can think of a few businesses that would be this case, like repo/auction houses, collection agencies perhaps. But what specifically do you do that allows you to be "better" off in a downturn economy?
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
January 30, 2008 at 11:24 PM #146026CoronitaParticipantpatientlywaiting,
With all due respect, mind if I ask what you or your business does that would allow you to do well in slow economies but not "even better" in good economy?
I can think of a few businesses that would be this case, like repo/auction houses, collection agencies perhaps. But what specifically do you do that allows you to be "better" off in a downturn economy?
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
January 30, 2008 at 11:24 PM #146034CoronitaParticipantpatientlywaiting,
With all due respect, mind if I ask what you or your business does that would allow you to do well in slow economies but not "even better" in good economy?
I can think of a few businesses that would be this case, like repo/auction houses, collection agencies perhaps. But what specifically do you do that allows you to be "better" off in a downturn economy?
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
January 30, 2008 at 11:24 PM #146093CoronitaParticipantpatientlywaiting,
With all due respect, mind if I ask what you or your business does that would allow you to do well in slow economies but not "even better" in good economy?
I can think of a few businesses that would be this case, like repo/auction houses, collection agencies perhaps. But what specifically do you do that allows you to be "better" off in a downturn economy?
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
January 30, 2008 at 11:38 PM #145762temeculaguyParticipantFLU, no apology needed, just that it wasn’t directed at me is enough. Like the other fiscal conservatives have expressed, I hate bubbles, they are counterproductive to good planning. In a perfect world housing would have gone up 5% a year, stocks and commodities too. It’s the drastic swings up and down that screw things up, because despite what anyone says, equilibrium cannot be denied. Speaking of history, no matter how many books we read, everyone has to experience a bubble in order to spot one. I also experienced a meticulous clock cleansing in the dot com bubble and it was that lesson that served me well in the R/E bubble, hopefully today’s bubble victim will see the next one coming and act accordingly.
January 30, 2008 at 11:38 PM #146004temeculaguyParticipantFLU, no apology needed, just that it wasn’t directed at me is enough. Like the other fiscal conservatives have expressed, I hate bubbles, they are counterproductive to good planning. In a perfect world housing would have gone up 5% a year, stocks and commodities too. It’s the drastic swings up and down that screw things up, because despite what anyone says, equilibrium cannot be denied. Speaking of history, no matter how many books we read, everyone has to experience a bubble in order to spot one. I also experienced a meticulous clock cleansing in the dot com bubble and it was that lesson that served me well in the R/E bubble, hopefully today’s bubble victim will see the next one coming and act accordingly.
January 30, 2008 at 11:38 PM #146036temeculaguyParticipantFLU, no apology needed, just that it wasn’t directed at me is enough. Like the other fiscal conservatives have expressed, I hate bubbles, they are counterproductive to good planning. In a perfect world housing would have gone up 5% a year, stocks and commodities too. It’s the drastic swings up and down that screw things up, because despite what anyone says, equilibrium cannot be denied. Speaking of history, no matter how many books we read, everyone has to experience a bubble in order to spot one. I also experienced a meticulous clock cleansing in the dot com bubble and it was that lesson that served me well in the R/E bubble, hopefully today’s bubble victim will see the next one coming and act accordingly.
January 30, 2008 at 11:38 PM #146043temeculaguyParticipantFLU, no apology needed, just that it wasn’t directed at me is enough. Like the other fiscal conservatives have expressed, I hate bubbles, they are counterproductive to good planning. In a perfect world housing would have gone up 5% a year, stocks and commodities too. It’s the drastic swings up and down that screw things up, because despite what anyone says, equilibrium cannot be denied. Speaking of history, no matter how many books we read, everyone has to experience a bubble in order to spot one. I also experienced a meticulous clock cleansing in the dot com bubble and it was that lesson that served me well in the R/E bubble, hopefully today’s bubble victim will see the next one coming and act accordingly.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.