Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Famed Columnist gives rotten mortgage advice
- This topic has 165 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by patb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 28, 2009 at 11:57 PM #422195June 29, 2009 at 12:20 AM #421477EugeneParticipant
Ethics, honor, promise … being a man of your word … all that applies only to non-collateralized, verbal interactions between human beings.
There’s no ethics and there’s no honor in legal contracts. It’s all based on cold logic. Especially true when the other party is not a human being but a soulless machine. The contract states that the bank will do A, and you will do B monthly for thirty years, and, should you fail to do so at some point before those thirty years are over, the bank is permitted to do C. In the event of a mutual agreement, both parties may discard the contract and sign a new one under different terms. Ethics does not enter.
June 29, 2009 at 12:20 AM #421708EugeneParticipantEthics, honor, promise … being a man of your word … all that applies only to non-collateralized, verbal interactions between human beings.
There’s no ethics and there’s no honor in legal contracts. It’s all based on cold logic. Especially true when the other party is not a human being but a soulless machine. The contract states that the bank will do A, and you will do B monthly for thirty years, and, should you fail to do so at some point before those thirty years are over, the bank is permitted to do C. In the event of a mutual agreement, both parties may discard the contract and sign a new one under different terms. Ethics does not enter.
June 29, 2009 at 12:20 AM #421981EugeneParticipantEthics, honor, promise … being a man of your word … all that applies only to non-collateralized, verbal interactions between human beings.
There’s no ethics and there’s no honor in legal contracts. It’s all based on cold logic. Especially true when the other party is not a human being but a soulless machine. The contract states that the bank will do A, and you will do B monthly for thirty years, and, should you fail to do so at some point before those thirty years are over, the bank is permitted to do C. In the event of a mutual agreement, both parties may discard the contract and sign a new one under different terms. Ethics does not enter.
June 29, 2009 at 12:20 AM #422049EugeneParticipantEthics, honor, promise … being a man of your word … all that applies only to non-collateralized, verbal interactions between human beings.
There’s no ethics and there’s no honor in legal contracts. It’s all based on cold logic. Especially true when the other party is not a human being but a soulless machine. The contract states that the bank will do A, and you will do B monthly for thirty years, and, should you fail to do so at some point before those thirty years are over, the bank is permitted to do C. In the event of a mutual agreement, both parties may discard the contract and sign a new one under different terms. Ethics does not enter.
June 29, 2009 at 12:20 AM #422210EugeneParticipantEthics, honor, promise … being a man of your word … all that applies only to non-collateralized, verbal interactions between human beings.
There’s no ethics and there’s no honor in legal contracts. It’s all based on cold logic. Especially true when the other party is not a human being but a soulless machine. The contract states that the bank will do A, and you will do B monthly for thirty years, and, should you fail to do so at some point before those thirty years are over, the bank is permitted to do C. In the event of a mutual agreement, both parties may discard the contract and sign a new one under different terms. Ethics does not enter.
June 29, 2009 at 10:54 AM #421637AecetiaParticipantTG:
I am saving that quote. That is not just the best of Temeculaguy, I think it is the best ever. And you have some done some excellent writing on Piggington. I like everything there except for the avoiding sugar part. Godiva has sugar in it and life is too short not to enjoy good chocolate!
June 29, 2009 at 10:54 AM #421867AecetiaParticipantTG:
I am saving that quote. That is not just the best of Temeculaguy, I think it is the best ever. And you have some done some excellent writing on Piggington. I like everything there except for the avoiding sugar part. Godiva has sugar in it and life is too short not to enjoy good chocolate!
June 29, 2009 at 10:54 AM #422141AecetiaParticipantTG:
I am saving that quote. That is not just the best of Temeculaguy, I think it is the best ever. And you have some done some excellent writing on Piggington. I like everything there except for the avoiding sugar part. Godiva has sugar in it and life is too short not to enjoy good chocolate!
June 29, 2009 at 10:54 AM #422209AecetiaParticipantTG:
I am saving that quote. That is not just the best of Temeculaguy, I think it is the best ever. And you have some done some excellent writing on Piggington. I like everything there except for the avoiding sugar part. Godiva has sugar in it and life is too short not to enjoy good chocolate!
June 29, 2009 at 10:54 AM #422371AecetiaParticipantTG:
I am saving that quote. That is not just the best of Temeculaguy, I think it is the best ever. And you have some done some excellent writing on Piggington. I like everything there except for the avoiding sugar part. Godiva has sugar in it and life is too short not to enjoy good chocolate!
June 29, 2009 at 11:05 AM #421647briansd1Guest[quote=Eugene]Ethics, honor, promise … being a man of your word … all that applies only to non-collateralized, verbal interactions between human beings.
There’s no ethics and there’s no honor in legal contracts. It’s all based on cold logic. Especially true when the other party is not a human being but a soulless machine. The contract states that the bank will do A, and you will do B monthly for thirty years, and, should you fail to do so at some point before those thirty years are over, the bank is permitted to do C. In the event of a mutual agreement, both parties may discard the contract and sign a new one under different terms. Ethics does not enter.[/quote]
I completely agree with Eugene.
June 29, 2009 at 11:05 AM #421877briansd1Guest[quote=Eugene]Ethics, honor, promise … being a man of your word … all that applies only to non-collateralized, verbal interactions between human beings.
There’s no ethics and there’s no honor in legal contracts. It’s all based on cold logic. Especially true when the other party is not a human being but a soulless machine. The contract states that the bank will do A, and you will do B monthly for thirty years, and, should you fail to do so at some point before those thirty years are over, the bank is permitted to do C. In the event of a mutual agreement, both parties may discard the contract and sign a new one under different terms. Ethics does not enter.[/quote]
I completely agree with Eugene.
June 29, 2009 at 11:05 AM #422151briansd1Guest[quote=Eugene]Ethics, honor, promise … being a man of your word … all that applies only to non-collateralized, verbal interactions between human beings.
There’s no ethics and there’s no honor in legal contracts. It’s all based on cold logic. Especially true when the other party is not a human being but a soulless machine. The contract states that the bank will do A, and you will do B monthly for thirty years, and, should you fail to do so at some point before those thirty years are over, the bank is permitted to do C. In the event of a mutual agreement, both parties may discard the contract and sign a new one under different terms. Ethics does not enter.[/quote]
I completely agree with Eugene.
June 29, 2009 at 11:05 AM #422219briansd1Guest[quote=Eugene]Ethics, honor, promise … being a man of your word … all that applies only to non-collateralized, verbal interactions between human beings.
There’s no ethics and there’s no honor in legal contracts. It’s all based on cold logic. Especially true when the other party is not a human being but a soulless machine. The contract states that the bank will do A, and you will do B monthly for thirty years, and, should you fail to do so at some point before those thirty years are over, the bank is permitted to do C. In the event of a mutual agreement, both parties may discard the contract and sign a new one under different terms. Ethics does not enter.[/quote]
I completely agree with Eugene.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.