Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Economic datapoint: auto sales
- This topic has 35 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 5 months ago by
mixxalot.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 1, 2008 at 2:55 PM #232079July 1, 2008 at 2:56 PM #231901
CoronitaParticipantmy bad, i misread that… post…Weird, different sources are reporting different numbers.
July 1, 2008 at 2:56 PM #232023
CoronitaParticipantmy bad, i misread that… post…Weird, different sources are reporting different numbers.
July 1, 2008 at 2:56 PM #232033
CoronitaParticipantmy bad, i misread that… post…Weird, different sources are reporting different numbers.
July 1, 2008 at 2:56 PM #232073
CoronitaParticipantmy bad, i misread that… post…Weird, different sources are reporting different numbers.
July 1, 2008 at 2:56 PM #232083
CoronitaParticipantmy bad, i misread that… post…Weird, different sources are reporting different numbers.
July 1, 2008 at 2:59 PM #231906an
ParticipantWhat other source are you reading? Autoblog calculated the % differently, so that might be the reason. Also, most auto maker report on the first of the Month, so I think these # are pretty up to date. In my post, which is from autoblog, it also have # from 6/07 as well for you to compare.
July 1, 2008 at 2:59 PM #232027an
ParticipantWhat other source are you reading? Autoblog calculated the % differently, so that might be the reason. Also, most auto maker report on the first of the Month, so I think these # are pretty up to date. In my post, which is from autoblog, it also have # from 6/07 as well for you to compare.
July 1, 2008 at 2:59 PM #232037an
ParticipantWhat other source are you reading? Autoblog calculated the % differently, so that might be the reason. Also, most auto maker report on the first of the Month, so I think these # are pretty up to date. In my post, which is from autoblog, it also have # from 6/07 as well for you to compare.
July 1, 2008 at 2:59 PM #232080an
ParticipantWhat other source are you reading? Autoblog calculated the % differently, so that might be the reason. Also, most auto maker report on the first of the Month, so I think these # are pretty up to date. In my post, which is from autoblog, it also have # from 6/07 as well for you to compare.
July 1, 2008 at 2:59 PM #232088an
ParticipantWhat other source are you reading? Autoblog calculated the % differently, so that might be the reason. Also, most auto maker report on the first of the Month, so I think these # are pretty up to date. In my post, which is from autoblog, it also have # from 6/07 as well for you to compare.
July 1, 2008 at 3:02 PM #231911
CoronitaParticipantnews feeds and autospies
Actually i think the difference is news sources are reporting change from monthly.
Edit…Ah, autoblog reports average number of vehicles sold per day. I don’t know how to read today.
July 1, 2008 at 3:02 PM #232034
CoronitaParticipantnews feeds and autospies
Actually i think the difference is news sources are reporting change from monthly.
Edit…Ah, autoblog reports average number of vehicles sold per day. I don’t know how to read today.
July 1, 2008 at 3:02 PM #232042
CoronitaParticipantnews feeds and autospies
Actually i think the difference is news sources are reporting change from monthly.
Edit…Ah, autoblog reports average number of vehicles sold per day. I don’t know how to read today.
July 1, 2008 at 3:02 PM #232082
CoronitaParticipantnews feeds and autospies
Actually i think the difference is news sources are reporting change from monthly.
Edit…Ah, autoblog reports average number of vehicles sold per day. I don’t know how to read today.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
