- This topic has 90 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 29, 2010 at 8:23 AM #556664May 29, 2010 at 9:32 AM #556591AnonymousGuest
So let’s put all humans in jail because some are murderers.
May 29, 2010 at 9:32 AM #557558AnonymousGuestSo let’s put all humans in jail because some are murderers.
May 29, 2010 at 9:32 AM #557178AnonymousGuestSo let’s put all humans in jail because some are murderers.
May 29, 2010 at 9:32 AM #556694AnonymousGuestSo let’s put all humans in jail because some are murderers.
May 29, 2010 at 9:32 AM #557281AnonymousGuestSo let’s put all humans in jail because some are murderers.
May 29, 2010 at 10:17 AM #557606AnonymousGuestHapps,
I say this in the gentlest way possible, which is difficult for me, but here goes: seek therapy. The stream-of-consciousness writing style, obsession with possibility of dog attack, and the fact you’ve been walking the same route for >20 years without ever being attacked much less bitten raise my eyebrows.
In my experience, most dog attacks occur on their home turf, be it their home or immediate surrounds, ie they are defending in a territorial manner. Occasionally packs will feed off each other’s energy, etc. Is it a real risk? Sure, but extremely uncommon.
In my HUMBLE opinion, the aggressive traits combined with the strength of the put bull (stafforshire) terriers are a public health risk and I see no reason for the existence of this particular breed.
When is the last time you saw a police K-9 pit bull?
Risk assessment is difficult for many people. Risk of flight disaster, dog attacks, etc pale next to risk of walking alongside a busy roadway, or driving on the roadway. Or breathing city air.
May 29, 2010 at 10:17 AM #556641AnonymousGuestHapps,
I say this in the gentlest way possible, which is difficult for me, but here goes: seek therapy. The stream-of-consciousness writing style, obsession with possibility of dog attack, and the fact you’ve been walking the same route for >20 years without ever being attacked much less bitten raise my eyebrows.
In my experience, most dog attacks occur on their home turf, be it their home or immediate surrounds, ie they are defending in a territorial manner. Occasionally packs will feed off each other’s energy, etc. Is it a real risk? Sure, but extremely uncommon.
In my HUMBLE opinion, the aggressive traits combined with the strength of the put bull (stafforshire) terriers are a public health risk and I see no reason for the existence of this particular breed.
When is the last time you saw a police K-9 pit bull?
Risk assessment is difficult for many people. Risk of flight disaster, dog attacks, etc pale next to risk of walking alongside a busy roadway, or driving on the roadway. Or breathing city air.
May 29, 2010 at 10:17 AM #557330AnonymousGuestHapps,
I say this in the gentlest way possible, which is difficult for me, but here goes: seek therapy. The stream-of-consciousness writing style, obsession with possibility of dog attack, and the fact you’ve been walking the same route for >20 years without ever being attacked much less bitten raise my eyebrows.
In my experience, most dog attacks occur on their home turf, be it their home or immediate surrounds, ie they are defending in a territorial manner. Occasionally packs will feed off each other’s energy, etc. Is it a real risk? Sure, but extremely uncommon.
In my HUMBLE opinion, the aggressive traits combined with the strength of the put bull (stafforshire) terriers are a public health risk and I see no reason for the existence of this particular breed.
When is the last time you saw a police K-9 pit bull?
Risk assessment is difficult for many people. Risk of flight disaster, dog attacks, etc pale next to risk of walking alongside a busy roadway, or driving on the roadway. Or breathing city air.
May 29, 2010 at 10:17 AM #556744AnonymousGuestHapps,
I say this in the gentlest way possible, which is difficult for me, but here goes: seek therapy. The stream-of-consciousness writing style, obsession with possibility of dog attack, and the fact you’ve been walking the same route for >20 years without ever being attacked much less bitten raise my eyebrows.
In my experience, most dog attacks occur on their home turf, be it their home or immediate surrounds, ie they are defending in a territorial manner. Occasionally packs will feed off each other’s energy, etc. Is it a real risk? Sure, but extremely uncommon.
In my HUMBLE opinion, the aggressive traits combined with the strength of the put bull (stafforshire) terriers are a public health risk and I see no reason for the existence of this particular breed.
When is the last time you saw a police K-9 pit bull?
Risk assessment is difficult for many people. Risk of flight disaster, dog attacks, etc pale next to risk of walking alongside a busy roadway, or driving on the roadway. Or breathing city air.
May 29, 2010 at 10:17 AM #557228AnonymousGuestHapps,
I say this in the gentlest way possible, which is difficult for me, but here goes: seek therapy. The stream-of-consciousness writing style, obsession with possibility of dog attack, and the fact you’ve been walking the same route for >20 years without ever being attacked much less bitten raise my eyebrows.
In my experience, most dog attacks occur on their home turf, be it their home or immediate surrounds, ie they are defending in a territorial manner. Occasionally packs will feed off each other’s energy, etc. Is it a real risk? Sure, but extremely uncommon.
In my HUMBLE opinion, the aggressive traits combined with the strength of the put bull (stafforshire) terriers are a public health risk and I see no reason for the existence of this particular breed.
When is the last time you saw a police K-9 pit bull?
Risk assessment is difficult for many people. Risk of flight disaster, dog attacks, etc pale next to risk of walking alongside a busy roadway, or driving on the roadway. Or breathing city air.
May 29, 2010 at 10:49 AM #557369SK in CVParticipantInsightful comment.
Specially this part.
[quote=deriving drunk]
In my experience, most dog attacks occur on their home turf, be it their home or immediate surrounds, ie they are defending in a territorial manner. Occasionally packs will feed off each other’s energy, etc. Is it a real risk? Sure, but extremely uncommon.[/quote]
I’ll expand that a bit to include the event the OP described where a dog on lead was involved with a dog off lead and violence erupted. Dog behaviorists use the term barrier agression. Dogs will often display agression on one side of a fence towards a percieved threat on the opposite side of the fence. But home territory is only a piece of that puzzle. Same thing can occur when one is on lead and one isn’t. (Or two on lead, for that matter.) The one on lead has greater exposure to threats, and is much more likely to display agression. In most cases, it has nothing to do with obedience, it’s temperment. Which makes it extraordinarily risky walking a dog on lead through a dog park with dogs off lead, even with a well trained dog. (I know all hell would break loose if I tried that with my main dog.) A few dozen dogs off lead are unlikely to fight. (not never, just unlikely)
May 29, 2010 at 10:49 AM #557268SK in CVParticipantInsightful comment.
Specially this part.
[quote=deriving drunk]
In my experience, most dog attacks occur on their home turf, be it their home or immediate surrounds, ie they are defending in a territorial manner. Occasionally packs will feed off each other’s energy, etc. Is it a real risk? Sure, but extremely uncommon.[/quote]
I’ll expand that a bit to include the event the OP described where a dog on lead was involved with a dog off lead and violence erupted. Dog behaviorists use the term barrier agression. Dogs will often display agression on one side of a fence towards a percieved threat on the opposite side of the fence. But home territory is only a piece of that puzzle. Same thing can occur when one is on lead and one isn’t. (Or two on lead, for that matter.) The one on lead has greater exposure to threats, and is much more likely to display agression. In most cases, it has nothing to do with obedience, it’s temperment. Which makes it extraordinarily risky walking a dog on lead through a dog park with dogs off lead, even with a well trained dog. (I know all hell would break loose if I tried that with my main dog.) A few dozen dogs off lead are unlikely to fight. (not never, just unlikely)
May 29, 2010 at 10:49 AM #556680SK in CVParticipantInsightful comment.
Specially this part.
[quote=deriving drunk]
In my experience, most dog attacks occur on their home turf, be it their home or immediate surrounds, ie they are defending in a territorial manner. Occasionally packs will feed off each other’s energy, etc. Is it a real risk? Sure, but extremely uncommon.[/quote]
I’ll expand that a bit to include the event the OP described where a dog on lead was involved with a dog off lead and violence erupted. Dog behaviorists use the term barrier agression. Dogs will often display agression on one side of a fence towards a percieved threat on the opposite side of the fence. But home territory is only a piece of that puzzle. Same thing can occur when one is on lead and one isn’t. (Or two on lead, for that matter.) The one on lead has greater exposure to threats, and is much more likely to display agression. In most cases, it has nothing to do with obedience, it’s temperment. Which makes it extraordinarily risky walking a dog on lead through a dog park with dogs off lead, even with a well trained dog. (I know all hell would break loose if I tried that with my main dog.) A few dozen dogs off lead are unlikely to fight. (not never, just unlikely)
May 29, 2010 at 10:49 AM #556782SK in CVParticipantInsightful comment.
Specially this part.
[quote=deriving drunk]
In my experience, most dog attacks occur on their home turf, be it their home or immediate surrounds, ie they are defending in a territorial manner. Occasionally packs will feed off each other’s energy, etc. Is it a real risk? Sure, but extremely uncommon.[/quote]
I’ll expand that a bit to include the event the OP described where a dog on lead was involved with a dog off lead and violence erupted. Dog behaviorists use the term barrier agression. Dogs will often display agression on one side of a fence towards a percieved threat on the opposite side of the fence. But home territory is only a piece of that puzzle. Same thing can occur when one is on lead and one isn’t. (Or two on lead, for that matter.) The one on lead has greater exposure to threats, and is much more likely to display agression. In most cases, it has nothing to do with obedience, it’s temperment. Which makes it extraordinarily risky walking a dog on lead through a dog park with dogs off lead, even with a well trained dog. (I know all hell would break loose if I tried that with my main dog.) A few dozen dogs off lead are unlikely to fight. (not never, just unlikely)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.