- This topic has 35 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by
Eugene.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 6, 2008 at 7:17 PM #12010March 6, 2008 at 8:09 PM #165587
Bugs
ParticipantInasmuch as less than 7% of the households in SD county can swing a $4,800 monthly PITI payment I’m thinking the lighter interest load on jumbos is basically meaningless to pricing. Bear in mind, the logical alternative to a $700k home is the $600k home located next door that’s in foreclosure. It’s in foreclosure because it’s borrower could never afford the 5.5% fixed rate that was in effect when he bought, much less the 6% rate you’re talking about now, two years later.
March 6, 2008 at 8:09 PM #165589Bugs
ParticipantInasmuch as less than 7% of the households in SD county can swing a $4,800 monthly PITI payment I’m thinking the lighter interest load on jumbos is basically meaningless to pricing. Bear in mind, the logical alternative to a $700k home is the $600k home located next door that’s in foreclosure. It’s in foreclosure because it’s borrower could never afford the 5.5% fixed rate that was in effect when he bought, much less the 6% rate you’re talking about now, two years later.
March 6, 2008 at 8:09 PM #165575Bugs
ParticipantInasmuch as less than 7% of the households in SD county can swing a $4,800 monthly PITI payment I’m thinking the lighter interest load on jumbos is basically meaningless to pricing. Bear in mind, the logical alternative to a $700k home is the $600k home located next door that’s in foreclosure. It’s in foreclosure because it’s borrower could never afford the 5.5% fixed rate that was in effect when he bought, much less the 6% rate you’re talking about now, two years later.
March 6, 2008 at 8:09 PM #165676Bugs
ParticipantInasmuch as less than 7% of the households in SD county can swing a $4,800 monthly PITI payment I’m thinking the lighter interest load on jumbos is basically meaningless to pricing. Bear in mind, the logical alternative to a $700k home is the $600k home located next door that’s in foreclosure. It’s in foreclosure because it’s borrower could never afford the 5.5% fixed rate that was in effect when he bought, much less the 6% rate you’re talking about now, two years later.
March 6, 2008 at 8:09 PM #165261Bugs
ParticipantInasmuch as less than 7% of the households in SD county can swing a $4,800 monthly PITI payment I’m thinking the lighter interest load on jumbos is basically meaningless to pricing. Bear in mind, the logical alternative to a $700k home is the $600k home located next door that’s in foreclosure. It’s in foreclosure because it’s borrower could never afford the 5.5% fixed rate that was in effect when he bought, much less the 6% rate you’re talking about now, two years later.
March 6, 2008 at 8:31 PM #165691kev374
ParticipantI talked to a mortgage broker a few days ago about this limit increase and he says that is all hogwash since it doesn’t matter if they increase the limit to 5 billion dollars! He said the underwriting guidelines have changed and nobody can qualify with stated income loans anymore and a downpayment is needed. So the limit is pointless if nobody qualifies!
March 6, 2008 at 8:31 PM #165276kev374
ParticipantI talked to a mortgage broker a few days ago about this limit increase and he says that is all hogwash since it doesn’t matter if they increase the limit to 5 billion dollars! He said the underwriting guidelines have changed and nobody can qualify with stated income loans anymore and a downpayment is needed. So the limit is pointless if nobody qualifies!
March 6, 2008 at 8:31 PM #165590kev374
ParticipantI talked to a mortgage broker a few days ago about this limit increase and he says that is all hogwash since it doesn’t matter if they increase the limit to 5 billion dollars! He said the underwriting guidelines have changed and nobody can qualify with stated income loans anymore and a downpayment is needed. So the limit is pointless if nobody qualifies!
March 6, 2008 at 8:31 PM #165602kev374
ParticipantI talked to a mortgage broker a few days ago about this limit increase and he says that is all hogwash since it doesn’t matter if they increase the limit to 5 billion dollars! He said the underwriting guidelines have changed and nobody can qualify with stated income loans anymore and a downpayment is needed. So the limit is pointless if nobody qualifies!
March 6, 2008 at 8:31 PM #165604kev374
ParticipantI talked to a mortgage broker a few days ago about this limit increase and he says that is all hogwash since it doesn’t matter if they increase the limit to 5 billion dollars! He said the underwriting guidelines have changed and nobody can qualify with stated income loans anymore and a downpayment is needed. So the limit is pointless if nobody qualifies!
March 6, 2008 at 8:36 PM #165696Eugene
ParticipantI don’t think you can get those loans yet.
March 6, 2008 at 8:36 PM #165281Eugene
ParticipantI don’t think you can get those loans yet.
March 6, 2008 at 8:36 PM #165595Eugene
ParticipantI don’t think you can get those loans yet.
March 6, 2008 at 8:36 PM #165607Eugene
ParticipantI don’t think you can get those loans yet.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.