- This topic has 90 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 1 month ago by
SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 8, 2008 at 2:20 PM #11434January 8, 2008 at 3:01 PM #131881
stansd
ParticipantHoly Crap…that explains the low November.
A quick look at history seems to show that December often blips, though.
Jan often tends to be higher still, however.
Stan
January 8, 2008 at 3:01 PM #132168stansd
ParticipantHoly Crap…that explains the low November.
A quick look at history seems to show that December often blips, though.
Jan often tends to be higher still, however.
Stan
January 8, 2008 at 3:01 PM #132134stansd
ParticipantHoly Crap…that explains the low November.
A quick look at history seems to show that December often blips, though.
Jan often tends to be higher still, however.
Stan
January 8, 2008 at 3:01 PM #132063stansd
ParticipantHoly Crap…that explains the low November.
A quick look at history seems to show that December often blips, though.
Jan often tends to be higher still, however.
Stan
January 8, 2008 at 3:01 PM #132072stansd
ParticipantHoly Crap…that explains the low November.
A quick look at history seems to show that December often blips, though.
Jan often tends to be higher still, however.
Stan
January 8, 2008 at 3:04 PM #132180davelj
ParticipantAnyone know why the November numbers broke the trend so decisively only to have the trend reasserted with a vengeance in December? Someone mentioned in a previous post that maybe the November numbers represented a seasonal issue, or perhaps loan modifications were increasing, which I couldn’t disagree with. But the December numbers are a nightmare. If December is any indication of what 2008 numbers are going to look like… we could see 15,000+ trustee deeds next year, which is 250% of the worst year during the 90s (1996 to be exact). Oh Lawzy… lawzy lawzy lawzy.
January 8, 2008 at 3:04 PM #132143davelj
ParticipantAnyone know why the November numbers broke the trend so decisively only to have the trend reasserted with a vengeance in December? Someone mentioned in a previous post that maybe the November numbers represented a seasonal issue, or perhaps loan modifications were increasing, which I couldn’t disagree with. But the December numbers are a nightmare. If December is any indication of what 2008 numbers are going to look like… we could see 15,000+ trustee deeds next year, which is 250% of the worst year during the 90s (1996 to be exact). Oh Lawzy… lawzy lawzy lawzy.
January 8, 2008 at 3:04 PM #132085davelj
ParticipantAnyone know why the November numbers broke the trend so decisively only to have the trend reasserted with a vengeance in December? Someone mentioned in a previous post that maybe the November numbers represented a seasonal issue, or perhaps loan modifications were increasing, which I couldn’t disagree with. But the December numbers are a nightmare. If December is any indication of what 2008 numbers are going to look like… we could see 15,000+ trustee deeds next year, which is 250% of the worst year during the 90s (1996 to be exact). Oh Lawzy… lawzy lawzy lawzy.
January 8, 2008 at 3:04 PM #131891davelj
ParticipantAnyone know why the November numbers broke the trend so decisively only to have the trend reasserted with a vengeance in December? Someone mentioned in a previous post that maybe the November numbers represented a seasonal issue, or perhaps loan modifications were increasing, which I couldn’t disagree with. But the December numbers are a nightmare. If December is any indication of what 2008 numbers are going to look like… we could see 15,000+ trustee deeds next year, which is 250% of the worst year during the 90s (1996 to be exact). Oh Lawzy… lawzy lawzy lawzy.
January 8, 2008 at 3:04 PM #132073davelj
ParticipantAnyone know why the November numbers broke the trend so decisively only to have the trend reasserted with a vengeance in December? Someone mentioned in a previous post that maybe the November numbers represented a seasonal issue, or perhaps loan modifications were increasing, which I couldn’t disagree with. But the December numbers are a nightmare. If December is any indication of what 2008 numbers are going to look like… we could see 15,000+ trustee deeds next year, which is 250% of the worst year during the 90s (1996 to be exact). Oh Lawzy… lawzy lawzy lawzy.
January 8, 2008 at 3:26 PM #132108unbiasedobserver
ParticipantDuring the 90’s bust the monthly defaults peaked around 1100 per month, this Dec. over 2,700! I’m estimating 40,000 defaults in 2008 alone. This is getting far worse than even I believed it would.
January 8, 2008 at 3:26 PM #132119unbiasedobserver
ParticipantDuring the 90’s bust the monthly defaults peaked around 1100 per month, this Dec. over 2,700! I’m estimating 40,000 defaults in 2008 alone. This is getting far worse than even I believed it would.
January 8, 2008 at 3:26 PM #132213unbiasedobserver
ParticipantDuring the 90’s bust the monthly defaults peaked around 1100 per month, this Dec. over 2,700! I’m estimating 40,000 defaults in 2008 alone. This is getting far worse than even I believed it would.
January 8, 2008 at 3:26 PM #132178unbiasedobserver
ParticipantDuring the 90’s bust the monthly defaults peaked around 1100 per month, this Dec. over 2,700! I’m estimating 40,000 defaults in 2008 alone. This is getting far worse than even I believed it would.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.