- This topic has 15 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by
Coronita.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 15, 2009 at 3:25 PM #16038July 15, 2009 at 4:58 PM #430963
XBoxBoy
ParticipantTwo things to keep in mind about these stats.
1) They use median price, which isn’t really a very good metric.
2) The overall numbers have enough samples to be good, but many of the individual zip numbers are too small a sample and have a lot of noise in them.
Still, I do believe that it’s fair to say that many areas are indeed still getting pummeled on price.
XBoxBoy
July 15, 2009 at 4:58 PM #431178XBoxBoy
ParticipantTwo things to keep in mind about these stats.
1) They use median price, which isn’t really a very good metric.
2) The overall numbers have enough samples to be good, but many of the individual zip numbers are too small a sample and have a lot of noise in them.
Still, I do believe that it’s fair to say that many areas are indeed still getting pummeled on price.
XBoxBoy
July 15, 2009 at 4:58 PM #431473XBoxBoy
ParticipantTwo things to keep in mind about these stats.
1) They use median price, which isn’t really a very good metric.
2) The overall numbers have enough samples to be good, but many of the individual zip numbers are too small a sample and have a lot of noise in them.
Still, I do believe that it’s fair to say that many areas are indeed still getting pummeled on price.
XBoxBoy
July 15, 2009 at 4:58 PM #431541XBoxBoy
ParticipantTwo things to keep in mind about these stats.
1) They use median price, which isn’t really a very good metric.
2) The overall numbers have enough samples to be good, but many of the individual zip numbers are too small a sample and have a lot of noise in them.
Still, I do believe that it’s fair to say that many areas are indeed still getting pummeled on price.
XBoxBoy
July 15, 2009 at 4:58 PM #431699XBoxBoy
ParticipantTwo things to keep in mind about these stats.
1) They use median price, which isn’t really a very good metric.
2) The overall numbers have enough samples to be good, but many of the individual zip numbers are too small a sample and have a lot of noise in them.
Still, I do believe that it’s fair to say that many areas are indeed still getting pummeled on price.
XBoxBoy
July 16, 2009 at 8:15 AM #431318
CoronitaParticipantData seems too thin in some areas. Del Mar for instance shows an upward movement, probably from the low sample space.
July 16, 2009 at 8:15 AM #431529
CoronitaParticipantData seems too thin in some areas. Del Mar for instance shows an upward movement, probably from the low sample space.
July 16, 2009 at 8:15 AM #431820
CoronitaParticipantData seems too thin in some areas. Del Mar for instance shows an upward movement, probably from the low sample space.
July 16, 2009 at 8:15 AM #431890
CoronitaParticipantData seems too thin in some areas. Del Mar for instance shows an upward movement, probably from the low sample space.
July 16, 2009 at 8:15 AM #432050
CoronitaParticipantData seems too thin in some areas. Del Mar for instance shows an upward movement, probably from the low sample space.
July 16, 2009 at 8:16 AM #431322
CoronitaParticipantData seems too thin in some areas. Del Mar for instance shows an upward movement, probably from the low sample space.
July 16, 2009 at 8:16 AM #431534
CoronitaParticipantData seems too thin in some areas. Del Mar for instance shows an upward movement, probably from the low sample space.
July 16, 2009 at 8:16 AM #431825
CoronitaParticipantData seems too thin in some areas. Del Mar for instance shows an upward movement, probably from the low sample space.
July 16, 2009 at 8:16 AM #431895
CoronitaParticipantData seems too thin in some areas. Del Mar for instance shows an upward movement, probably from the low sample space.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
