Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Dallas Fed Admits to Manipulating housing market
- This topic has 210 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by
CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 27, 2010 at 3:31 AM #645990December 27, 2010 at 11:09 AM #644883
SD Realtor
ParticipantHey now!
Financial Reform was on Brians big checkoff list?
You mean it was not created entirely for the protection of the American people?
Surely you jest….
December 27, 2010 at 11:09 AM #644954SD Realtor
ParticipantHey now!
Financial Reform was on Brians big checkoff list?
You mean it was not created entirely for the protection of the American people?
Surely you jest….
December 27, 2010 at 11:09 AM #645534SD Realtor
ParticipantHey now!
Financial Reform was on Brians big checkoff list?
You mean it was not created entirely for the protection of the American people?
Surely you jest….
December 27, 2010 at 11:09 AM #645671SD Realtor
ParticipantHey now!
Financial Reform was on Brians big checkoff list?
You mean it was not created entirely for the protection of the American people?
Surely you jest….
December 27, 2010 at 11:09 AM #645995SD Realtor
ParticipantHey now!
Financial Reform was on Brians big checkoff list?
You mean it was not created entirely for the protection of the American people?
Surely you jest….
December 27, 2010 at 12:52 PM #644888briansd1
GuestI believe it’s time that we recognize that in America, we intervene in the economy just as much as the socialist countries of Europe.
We just don’t call it what it is to obfuscate the issues. We bail out the banks, but our government is too timid to take them over and throw out the executives.
Our brand of socialism is for the very richest. It creates periods of exhuberance in boom and bust cycles. Only the most entrepreneurial and best connected people can take advantage of those cycles.
The average person who works hard and plays by the rules does not benefit.
As far a financial reform is concerned, it’s not the best bill but better than what we had before. That’s very different from the Federal Reserve (the topic of this thread) which as an independent central banks is free to act on its own.
Remember that those who deregulated the financial industry and caused the Financial Crisis of 2008 are most opposed to financial reform and have vowed to repeal it.
In life, the small differences are what distinguishes the good from the bad, the polite from the vulgar. Pay attention to the details.
December 27, 2010 at 12:52 PM #644959briansd1
GuestI believe it’s time that we recognize that in America, we intervene in the economy just as much as the socialist countries of Europe.
We just don’t call it what it is to obfuscate the issues. We bail out the banks, but our government is too timid to take them over and throw out the executives.
Our brand of socialism is for the very richest. It creates periods of exhuberance in boom and bust cycles. Only the most entrepreneurial and best connected people can take advantage of those cycles.
The average person who works hard and plays by the rules does not benefit.
As far a financial reform is concerned, it’s not the best bill but better than what we had before. That’s very different from the Federal Reserve (the topic of this thread) which as an independent central banks is free to act on its own.
Remember that those who deregulated the financial industry and caused the Financial Crisis of 2008 are most opposed to financial reform and have vowed to repeal it.
In life, the small differences are what distinguishes the good from the bad, the polite from the vulgar. Pay attention to the details.
December 27, 2010 at 12:52 PM #645539briansd1
GuestI believe it’s time that we recognize that in America, we intervene in the economy just as much as the socialist countries of Europe.
We just don’t call it what it is to obfuscate the issues. We bail out the banks, but our government is too timid to take them over and throw out the executives.
Our brand of socialism is for the very richest. It creates periods of exhuberance in boom and bust cycles. Only the most entrepreneurial and best connected people can take advantage of those cycles.
The average person who works hard and plays by the rules does not benefit.
As far a financial reform is concerned, it’s not the best bill but better than what we had before. That’s very different from the Federal Reserve (the topic of this thread) which as an independent central banks is free to act on its own.
Remember that those who deregulated the financial industry and caused the Financial Crisis of 2008 are most opposed to financial reform and have vowed to repeal it.
In life, the small differences are what distinguishes the good from the bad, the polite from the vulgar. Pay attention to the details.
December 27, 2010 at 12:52 PM #645676briansd1
GuestI believe it’s time that we recognize that in America, we intervene in the economy just as much as the socialist countries of Europe.
We just don’t call it what it is to obfuscate the issues. We bail out the banks, but our government is too timid to take them over and throw out the executives.
Our brand of socialism is for the very richest. It creates periods of exhuberance in boom and bust cycles. Only the most entrepreneurial and best connected people can take advantage of those cycles.
The average person who works hard and plays by the rules does not benefit.
As far a financial reform is concerned, it’s not the best bill but better than what we had before. That’s very different from the Federal Reserve (the topic of this thread) which as an independent central banks is free to act on its own.
Remember that those who deregulated the financial industry and caused the Financial Crisis of 2008 are most opposed to financial reform and have vowed to repeal it.
In life, the small differences are what distinguishes the good from the bad, the polite from the vulgar. Pay attention to the details.
December 27, 2010 at 12:52 PM #646000briansd1
GuestI believe it’s time that we recognize that in America, we intervene in the economy just as much as the socialist countries of Europe.
We just don’t call it what it is to obfuscate the issues. We bail out the banks, but our government is too timid to take them over and throw out the executives.
Our brand of socialism is for the very richest. It creates periods of exhuberance in boom and bust cycles. Only the most entrepreneurial and best connected people can take advantage of those cycles.
The average person who works hard and plays by the rules does not benefit.
As far a financial reform is concerned, it’s not the best bill but better than what we had before. That’s very different from the Federal Reserve (the topic of this thread) which as an independent central banks is free to act on its own.
Remember that those who deregulated the financial industry and caused the Financial Crisis of 2008 are most opposed to financial reform and have vowed to repeal it.
In life, the small differences are what distinguishes the good from the bad, the polite from the vulgar. Pay attention to the details.
December 27, 2010 at 1:32 PM #644897briansd1
GuestAbout financial reform, those who oppose it should look at the details and list the items they are so much against.
Sure, it won’t prevent the next financial crisis. The surest way to prevent the next financial crisis is not to have a financial system.
Nothing is 100% safe, so that’s not a good argument in my opinion.
As a small business owner, I’m happy that the financial regulatory bill has gotten closer to becoming law. Sure, it’s not perfect. But I gave up on perfection the minute my company started selling Microsoft (MSFT) products. In the long term, this bill will be a good thing for my company
http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/jun2010/sb20100629_183643.htm
December 27, 2010 at 1:32 PM #644969briansd1
GuestAbout financial reform, those who oppose it should look at the details and list the items they are so much against.
Sure, it won’t prevent the next financial crisis. The surest way to prevent the next financial crisis is not to have a financial system.
Nothing is 100% safe, so that’s not a good argument in my opinion.
As a small business owner, I’m happy that the financial regulatory bill has gotten closer to becoming law. Sure, it’s not perfect. But I gave up on perfection the minute my company started selling Microsoft (MSFT) products. In the long term, this bill will be a good thing for my company
http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/jun2010/sb20100629_183643.htm
December 27, 2010 at 1:32 PM #645549briansd1
GuestAbout financial reform, those who oppose it should look at the details and list the items they are so much against.
Sure, it won’t prevent the next financial crisis. The surest way to prevent the next financial crisis is not to have a financial system.
Nothing is 100% safe, so that’s not a good argument in my opinion.
As a small business owner, I’m happy that the financial regulatory bill has gotten closer to becoming law. Sure, it’s not perfect. But I gave up on perfection the minute my company started selling Microsoft (MSFT) products. In the long term, this bill will be a good thing for my company
http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/jun2010/sb20100629_183643.htm
December 27, 2010 at 1:32 PM #645686briansd1
GuestAbout financial reform, those who oppose it should look at the details and list the items they are so much against.
Sure, it won’t prevent the next financial crisis. The surest way to prevent the next financial crisis is not to have a financial system.
Nothing is 100% safe, so that’s not a good argument in my opinion.
As a small business owner, I’m happy that the financial regulatory bill has gotten closer to becoming law. Sure, it’s not perfect. But I gave up on perfection the minute my company started selling Microsoft (MSFT) products. In the long term, this bill will be a good thing for my company
http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/jun2010/sb20100629_183643.htm
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.