- This topic has 48 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 18 years ago by
markzuber.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 13, 2007 at 2:47 PM #99150November 13, 2007 at 2:47 PM #99167
CBad
ParticipantFYI, and how long did it take these people to get their money?
November 13, 2007 at 2:47 PM #99172ParticipantFYI, and how long did it take these people to get their money?
November 13, 2007 at 3:24 PM #99098kev374
Participantgaming the system? bub, are you serious??
The Fed is screwing with the markets and printing money to fuel ponzi schemes and entice people to take on more debt than they can afford so a select few on Wall St. can get rich…
who is gaming who here? Are you sure the system is not gaming the responsible American Public? Better wake up buddy!
November 13, 2007 at 3:24 PM #99157Participantgaming the system? bub, are you serious??
The Fed is screwing with the markets and printing money to fuel ponzi schemes and entice people to take on more debt than they can afford so a select few on Wall St. can get rich…
who is gaming who here? Are you sure the system is not gaming the responsible American Public? Better wake up buddy!
November 13, 2007 at 3:24 PM #99174Participantgaming the system? bub, are you serious??
The Fed is screwing with the markets and printing money to fuel ponzi schemes and entice people to take on more debt than they can afford so a select few on Wall St. can get rich…
who is gaming who here? Are you sure the system is not gaming the responsible American Public? Better wake up buddy!
November 13, 2007 at 3:24 PM #99180Participantgaming the system? bub, are you serious??
The Fed is screwing with the markets and printing money to fuel ponzi schemes and entice people to take on more debt than they can afford so a select few on Wall St. can get rich…
who is gaming who here? Are you sure the system is not gaming the responsible American Public? Better wake up buddy!
November 13, 2007 at 3:44 PM #99110patientlywaiting
ParticipantLike I said before, I had money in failed S&Ls in the 1990s. It’s not a big deal. When there is a failure the receiver comes in and runs the bank like before without disruption. They then sells the assets of the bank with any short covered by the taxpayers.
Even if FDIC becomes insolvent, Congress will enact a bailout plan such as RTC to run and liquidate the banks. Just make sure that your funds are FDIC insured.
If we go the way of Argentina, then kiss the future of your kids goodbye. As far as I know, Tango and the night-life are still thriving in Buenos Aires. They are still having fun down there.
November 13, 2007 at 3:44 PM #99169ParticipantLike I said before, I had money in failed S&Ls in the 1990s. It’s not a big deal. When there is a failure the receiver comes in and runs the bank like before without disruption. They then sells the assets of the bank with any short covered by the taxpayers.
Even if FDIC becomes insolvent, Congress will enact a bailout plan such as RTC to run and liquidate the banks. Just make sure that your funds are FDIC insured.
If we go the way of Argentina, then kiss the future of your kids goodbye. As far as I know, Tango and the night-life are still thriving in Buenos Aires. They are still having fun down there.
November 13, 2007 at 3:44 PM #99186ParticipantLike I said before, I had money in failed S&Ls in the 1990s. It’s not a big deal. When there is a failure the receiver comes in and runs the bank like before without disruption. They then sells the assets of the bank with any short covered by the taxpayers.
Even if FDIC becomes insolvent, Congress will enact a bailout plan such as RTC to run and liquidate the banks. Just make sure that your funds are FDIC insured.
If we go the way of Argentina, then kiss the future of your kids goodbye. As far as I know, Tango and the night-life are still thriving in Buenos Aires. They are still having fun down there.
November 13, 2007 at 3:44 PM #99192ParticipantLike I said before, I had money in failed S&Ls in the 1990s. It’s not a big deal. When there is a failure the receiver comes in and runs the bank like before without disruption. They then sells the assets of the bank with any short covered by the taxpayers.
Even if FDIC becomes insolvent, Congress will enact a bailout plan such as RTC to run and liquidate the banks. Just make sure that your funds are FDIC insured.
If we go the way of Argentina, then kiss the future of your kids goodbye. As far as I know, Tango and the night-life are still thriving in Buenos Aires. They are still having fun down there.
November 13, 2007 at 3:46 PM #99114akbarpunjabi
ParticipantThat link to the FDIC is great. What would cause so many people to simply throw away money by having more than $100,000 in any single account? Did about 1500 people throw away around $36,000 just because they got too lazy to open up new accounts and transfer the money? I would have imagined people who banked online through NetBank would have been smarter.
November 13, 2007 at 3:46 PM #99173ParticipantThat link to the FDIC is great. What would cause so many people to simply throw away money by having more than $100,000 in any single account? Did about 1500 people throw away around $36,000 just because they got too lazy to open up new accounts and transfer the money? I would have imagined people who banked online through NetBank would have been smarter.
November 13, 2007 at 3:46 PM #99190ParticipantThat link to the FDIC is great. What would cause so many people to simply throw away money by having more than $100,000 in any single account? Did about 1500 people throw away around $36,000 just because they got too lazy to open up new accounts and transfer the money? I would have imagined people who banked online through NetBank would have been smarter.
November 13, 2007 at 3:46 PM #99196ParticipantThat link to the FDIC is great. What would cause so many people to simply throw away money by having more than $100,000 in any single account? Did about 1500 people throw away around $36,000 just because they got too lazy to open up new accounts and transfer the money? I would have imagined people who banked online through NetBank would have been smarter.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
