Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Cop Trashed House- Now he’s a wanted a man
- This topic has 306 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 3 months ago by spdrun.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 7, 2010 at 8:04 PM #615519October 7, 2010 at 9:52 PM #614489PCinSDGuest
[quote=bubba99]I am not sure where the crime is. Vandalism is for property “any real or personal property not his or her own”. If the trashing was before the sale – no crime[/quote]
Here’s a short legal write-up from January, 2009 about this exact type of situation:
http://www.gdlawoffices.com/update/January_Courtside_Newsletter_09.pdf
It seems Penal Code Section 502.5 addresses this type of behavior.
I just googled it, I have no idea who that lawyer is.
October 7, 2010 at 9:52 PM #614574PCinSDGuest[quote=bubba99]I am not sure where the crime is. Vandalism is for property “any real or personal property not his or her own”. If the trashing was before the sale – no crime[/quote]
Here’s a short legal write-up from January, 2009 about this exact type of situation:
http://www.gdlawoffices.com/update/January_Courtside_Newsletter_09.pdf
It seems Penal Code Section 502.5 addresses this type of behavior.
I just googled it, I have no idea who that lawyer is.
October 7, 2010 at 9:52 PM #615117PCinSDGuest[quote=bubba99]I am not sure where the crime is. Vandalism is for property “any real or personal property not his or her own”. If the trashing was before the sale – no crime[/quote]
Here’s a short legal write-up from January, 2009 about this exact type of situation:
http://www.gdlawoffices.com/update/January_Courtside_Newsletter_09.pdf
It seems Penal Code Section 502.5 addresses this type of behavior.
I just googled it, I have no idea who that lawyer is.
October 7, 2010 at 9:52 PM #615232PCinSDGuest[quote=bubba99]I am not sure where the crime is. Vandalism is for property “any real or personal property not his or her own”. If the trashing was before the sale – no crime[/quote]
Here’s a short legal write-up from January, 2009 about this exact type of situation:
http://www.gdlawoffices.com/update/January_Courtside_Newsletter_09.pdf
It seems Penal Code Section 502.5 addresses this type of behavior.
I just googled it, I have no idea who that lawyer is.
October 7, 2010 at 9:52 PM #615549PCinSDGuest[quote=bubba99]I am not sure where the crime is. Vandalism is for property “any real or personal property not his or her own”. If the trashing was before the sale – no crime[/quote]
Here’s a short legal write-up from January, 2009 about this exact type of situation:
http://www.gdlawoffices.com/update/January_Courtside_Newsletter_09.pdf
It seems Penal Code Section 502.5 addresses this type of behavior.
I just googled it, I have no idea who that lawyer is.
October 7, 2010 at 11:10 PM #614509jpinpbParticipantI think the key word is “foreclosed” property. If it is already bank owned, then yes. If they haven’t foreclosed yet and they trash the place before they move, before it is “bank” owned, then I’m having trouble understanding how they can be charged w/vandalizing their own property. Particularly something like removing appliances. Suppose they purchased those appliances at Sears or something. Appliances don’t always convey w/the house.
Again, not justifying what the jerk did. He did what many others did. I’m just pissed b/c he makes other cops look bad. Realtor wife doing this, sure. That doesn’t surprise me. More than a few bad apples in that bunch.
October 7, 2010 at 11:10 PM #614594jpinpbParticipantI think the key word is “foreclosed” property. If it is already bank owned, then yes. If they haven’t foreclosed yet and they trash the place before they move, before it is “bank” owned, then I’m having trouble understanding how they can be charged w/vandalizing their own property. Particularly something like removing appliances. Suppose they purchased those appliances at Sears or something. Appliances don’t always convey w/the house.
Again, not justifying what the jerk did. He did what many others did. I’m just pissed b/c he makes other cops look bad. Realtor wife doing this, sure. That doesn’t surprise me. More than a few bad apples in that bunch.
October 7, 2010 at 11:10 PM #615137jpinpbParticipantI think the key word is “foreclosed” property. If it is already bank owned, then yes. If they haven’t foreclosed yet and they trash the place before they move, before it is “bank” owned, then I’m having trouble understanding how they can be charged w/vandalizing their own property. Particularly something like removing appliances. Suppose they purchased those appliances at Sears or something. Appliances don’t always convey w/the house.
Again, not justifying what the jerk did. He did what many others did. I’m just pissed b/c he makes other cops look bad. Realtor wife doing this, sure. That doesn’t surprise me. More than a few bad apples in that bunch.
October 7, 2010 at 11:10 PM #615252jpinpbParticipantI think the key word is “foreclosed” property. If it is already bank owned, then yes. If they haven’t foreclosed yet and they trash the place before they move, before it is “bank” owned, then I’m having trouble understanding how they can be charged w/vandalizing their own property. Particularly something like removing appliances. Suppose they purchased those appliances at Sears or something. Appliances don’t always convey w/the house.
Again, not justifying what the jerk did. He did what many others did. I’m just pissed b/c he makes other cops look bad. Realtor wife doing this, sure. That doesn’t surprise me. More than a few bad apples in that bunch.
October 7, 2010 at 11:10 PM #615569jpinpbParticipantI think the key word is “foreclosed” property. If it is already bank owned, then yes. If they haven’t foreclosed yet and they trash the place before they move, before it is “bank” owned, then I’m having trouble understanding how they can be charged w/vandalizing their own property. Particularly something like removing appliances. Suppose they purchased those appliances at Sears or something. Appliances don’t always convey w/the house.
Again, not justifying what the jerk did. He did what many others did. I’m just pissed b/c he makes other cops look bad. Realtor wife doing this, sure. That doesn’t surprise me. More than a few bad apples in that bunch.
October 7, 2010 at 11:40 PM #614523CafeMotoParticipantwow, the video is unreal.
it was never their house (paid in full), I hope the law can hold them liable and issue punishment that follows them. Time to make someone the example.October 7, 2010 at 11:40 PM #614609CafeMotoParticipantwow, the video is unreal.
it was never their house (paid in full), I hope the law can hold them liable and issue punishment that follows them. Time to make someone the example.October 7, 2010 at 11:40 PM #615151CafeMotoParticipantwow, the video is unreal.
it was never their house (paid in full), I hope the law can hold them liable and issue punishment that follows them. Time to make someone the example.October 7, 2010 at 11:40 PM #615267CafeMotoParticipantwow, the video is unreal.
it was never their house (paid in full), I hope the law can hold them liable and issue punishment that follows them. Time to make someone the example. -
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.