- This topic has 410 replies, 36 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 24, 2008 at 10:58 AM #142454January 24, 2008 at 11:05 AM #142130SD RealtorParticipant
Let’s see….
Didn’t someone recently make a comment about nationalization of housing?
If anyone thinks this is a good thing then I would heartily disagree. Those who keep thinking that nothing can be done to stop the depreciation cycle may be correct. Yet moves like this, political incentivization programs and the likes will indeed drag the cycle out a heck of alot longer.
Death by a thousand arrows guys.
*******
Like others, this would help me bigtime. The better rate I can get and lower payment I can get, all the better. I would take it in a minute. Yet to think that this is not anything but further subsidization of the market by our government is foolish. So basically in a roundabout manner, your taxes insure more and more crap and higher limits! Hooray!
January 24, 2008 at 11:05 AM #142357SD RealtorParticipantLet’s see….
Didn’t someone recently make a comment about nationalization of housing?
If anyone thinks this is a good thing then I would heartily disagree. Those who keep thinking that nothing can be done to stop the depreciation cycle may be correct. Yet moves like this, political incentivization programs and the likes will indeed drag the cycle out a heck of alot longer.
Death by a thousand arrows guys.
*******
Like others, this would help me bigtime. The better rate I can get and lower payment I can get, all the better. I would take it in a minute. Yet to think that this is not anything but further subsidization of the market by our government is foolish. So basically in a roundabout manner, your taxes insure more and more crap and higher limits! Hooray!
January 24, 2008 at 11:05 AM #142370SD RealtorParticipantLet’s see….
Didn’t someone recently make a comment about nationalization of housing?
If anyone thinks this is a good thing then I would heartily disagree. Those who keep thinking that nothing can be done to stop the depreciation cycle may be correct. Yet moves like this, political incentivization programs and the likes will indeed drag the cycle out a heck of alot longer.
Death by a thousand arrows guys.
*******
Like others, this would help me bigtime. The better rate I can get and lower payment I can get, all the better. I would take it in a minute. Yet to think that this is not anything but further subsidization of the market by our government is foolish. So basically in a roundabout manner, your taxes insure more and more crap and higher limits! Hooray!
January 24, 2008 at 11:05 AM #142397SD RealtorParticipantLet’s see….
Didn’t someone recently make a comment about nationalization of housing?
If anyone thinks this is a good thing then I would heartily disagree. Those who keep thinking that nothing can be done to stop the depreciation cycle may be correct. Yet moves like this, political incentivization programs and the likes will indeed drag the cycle out a heck of alot longer.
Death by a thousand arrows guys.
*******
Like others, this would help me bigtime. The better rate I can get and lower payment I can get, all the better. I would take it in a minute. Yet to think that this is not anything but further subsidization of the market by our government is foolish. So basically in a roundabout manner, your taxes insure more and more crap and higher limits! Hooray!
January 24, 2008 at 11:05 AM #142459SD RealtorParticipantLet’s see….
Didn’t someone recently make a comment about nationalization of housing?
If anyone thinks this is a good thing then I would heartily disagree. Those who keep thinking that nothing can be done to stop the depreciation cycle may be correct. Yet moves like this, political incentivization programs and the likes will indeed drag the cycle out a heck of alot longer.
Death by a thousand arrows guys.
*******
Like others, this would help me bigtime. The better rate I can get and lower payment I can get, all the better. I would take it in a minute. Yet to think that this is not anything but further subsidization of the market by our government is foolish. So basically in a roundabout manner, your taxes insure more and more crap and higher limits! Hooray!
January 24, 2008 at 11:17 AM #142140nostradamusParticipantThe article mentions tax rebates for individuals and breaks for businesses. Does this mean I get a rebate check plus extra write-offs for my businesses? Where can I find more info about the business breaks?
January 24, 2008 at 11:17 AM #142368nostradamusParticipantThe article mentions tax rebates for individuals and breaks for businesses. Does this mean I get a rebate check plus extra write-offs for my businesses? Where can I find more info about the business breaks?
January 24, 2008 at 11:17 AM #142380nostradamusParticipantThe article mentions tax rebates for individuals and breaks for businesses. Does this mean I get a rebate check plus extra write-offs for my businesses? Where can I find more info about the business breaks?
January 24, 2008 at 11:17 AM #142406nostradamusParticipantThe article mentions tax rebates for individuals and breaks for businesses. Does this mean I get a rebate check plus extra write-offs for my businesses? Where can I find more info about the business breaks?
January 24, 2008 at 11:17 AM #142469nostradamusParticipantThe article mentions tax rebates for individuals and breaks for businesses. Does this mean I get a rebate check plus extra write-offs for my businesses? Where can I find more info about the business breaks?
January 24, 2008 at 11:24 AM #142145sd_bearParticipantI just re-read the article and can no longer find where it says anything about conforming limits being raised. Did they scrap this? I’m having trouble finding anything about it now from current articles.
Please please please please please don’t raise those limits. They should be dropped to 300k.
January 24, 2008 at 11:24 AM #142373sd_bearParticipantI just re-read the article and can no longer find where it says anything about conforming limits being raised. Did they scrap this? I’m having trouble finding anything about it now from current articles.
Please please please please please don’t raise those limits. They should be dropped to 300k.
January 24, 2008 at 11:24 AM #142385sd_bearParticipantI just re-read the article and can no longer find where it says anything about conforming limits being raised. Did they scrap this? I’m having trouble finding anything about it now from current articles.
Please please please please please don’t raise those limits. They should be dropped to 300k.
January 24, 2008 at 11:24 AM #142411sd_bearParticipantI just re-read the article and can no longer find where it says anything about conforming limits being raised. Did they scrap this? I’m having trouble finding anything about it now from current articles.
Please please please please please don’t raise those limits. They should be dropped to 300k.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.