- This topic has 175 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by
felix.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 21, 2008 at 3:50 PM #291220October 21, 2008 at 3:50 PM #291222
Enorah
Participanthttp://www.wikiality.com/Rush_Limbaugh
“Rush on Black People
“I mean, why didn’t these morons leave New Orleans before the hurricane? I’ll tell you why: because they wanted to rape and loot! That’s just the way some people are! And if they’re black–if the rapists and looters are black–it’s not George Bush’s fault! We’ve had these problems ever since the Emancipation Proclamation. Once the whites leave town, all you’ve got is overwhelming lawlessness. That’s not racism, Mr. Snerdley; it’s a proven, demonstrable fact. Have you even seen a ghetto in Greenwich, Connecticut? I rest my case.”
“The NAACP should have riot rehearsal. They should get a liquor store and practice robberies.”
“They’re 12 percent of the population. Who the hell cares?”
“They oughta change Black History Month to Black Progress Month and start measuring it.”
“Look, let me put it to you this way: the NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it.”
“I mean, let’s face it, we didn’t have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: slavery built the South. I’m not saying we should bring it back; I’m just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark.”
“You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray. We miss you, James. Godspeed.”
October 21, 2008 at 3:50 PM #291260Participanthttp://www.wikiality.com/Rush_Limbaugh
“Rush on Black People
“I mean, why didn’t these morons leave New Orleans before the hurricane? I’ll tell you why: because they wanted to rape and loot! That’s just the way some people are! And if they’re black–if the rapists and looters are black–it’s not George Bush’s fault! We’ve had these problems ever since the Emancipation Proclamation. Once the whites leave town, all you’ve got is overwhelming lawlessness. That’s not racism, Mr. Snerdley; it’s a proven, demonstrable fact. Have you even seen a ghetto in Greenwich, Connecticut? I rest my case.”
“The NAACP should have riot rehearsal. They should get a liquor store and practice robberies.”
“They’re 12 percent of the population. Who the hell cares?”
“They oughta change Black History Month to Black Progress Month and start measuring it.”
“Look, let me put it to you this way: the NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it.”
“I mean, let’s face it, we didn’t have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: slavery built the South. I’m not saying we should bring it back; I’m just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark.”
“You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray. We miss you, James. Godspeed.”
October 21, 2008 at 4:49 PM #290878Arraya
ParticipantRush and his ilk are terrorists. Guardians to their kleptocratic masters playing on peoples fears and insecurities while distracting them from the systemic looting that is going on.
October 21, 2008 at 4:49 PM #291193ParticipantRush and his ilk are terrorists. Guardians to their kleptocratic masters playing on peoples fears and insecurities while distracting them from the systemic looting that is going on.
October 21, 2008 at 4:49 PM #291194ParticipantRush and his ilk are terrorists. Guardians to their kleptocratic masters playing on peoples fears and insecurities while distracting them from the systemic looting that is going on.
October 21, 2008 at 4:49 PM #291229ParticipantRush and his ilk are terrorists. Guardians to their kleptocratic masters playing on peoples fears and insecurities while distracting them from the systemic looting that is going on.
October 21, 2008 at 4:49 PM #291230ParticipantRush and his ilk are terrorists. Guardians to their kleptocratic masters playing on peoples fears and insecurities while distracting them from the systemic looting that is going on.
October 21, 2008 at 4:49 PM #291232ParticipantRush and his ilk are terrorists. Guardians to their kleptocratic masters playing on peoples fears and insecurities while distracting them from the systemic looting that is going on.
October 21, 2008 at 4:49 PM #291270ParticipantRush and his ilk are terrorists. Guardians to their kleptocratic masters playing on peoples fears and insecurities while distracting them from the systemic looting that is going on.
October 21, 2008 at 5:24 PM #290898Kilohana
ParticipantThe bottom line is that the “Obama’s Shady Past” narrative was created out of the need to distract voters and candidates from discussing the real issues… Hillary tried it and failed – and now McCain has made it the centerpiece of his campaign.
In fact, McCain’s campaign manager, Rick Davis explained it all perfectly:
“John McCain tried to point out how people should be informed about Barack Obama’s background, including his relationships with domestic terrorists like William Ayers. People are going to form these judgments. It’s great fodder for us to debate every day. I think it’s fun,”
Fun!
I’m sure there will again be skeptics calling me on my lies so here’s a link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8G6dDVjW6c :54 seconds in.
Yes, the Rush quotes were real. Does context really matter when the the topic is the so-called merits of slavery? How about praising the assassin of an American icon and Civil Rights leader? Is there *any* context in which this would be appropriate?
Is this type of dialogue good for America? Is this really who we are?
October 21, 2008 at 5:24 PM #291213ParticipantThe bottom line is that the “Obama’s Shady Past” narrative was created out of the need to distract voters and candidates from discussing the real issues… Hillary tried it and failed – and now McCain has made it the centerpiece of his campaign.
In fact, McCain’s campaign manager, Rick Davis explained it all perfectly:
“John McCain tried to point out how people should be informed about Barack Obama’s background, including his relationships with domestic terrorists like William Ayers. People are going to form these judgments. It’s great fodder for us to debate every day. I think it’s fun,”
Fun!
I’m sure there will again be skeptics calling me on my lies so here’s a link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8G6dDVjW6c :54 seconds in.
Yes, the Rush quotes were real. Does context really matter when the the topic is the so-called merits of slavery? How about praising the assassin of an American icon and Civil Rights leader? Is there *any* context in which this would be appropriate?
Is this type of dialogue good for America? Is this really who we are?
October 21, 2008 at 5:24 PM #291249ParticipantThe bottom line is that the “Obama’s Shady Past” narrative was created out of the need to distract voters and candidates from discussing the real issues… Hillary tried it and failed – and now McCain has made it the centerpiece of his campaign.
In fact, McCain’s campaign manager, Rick Davis explained it all perfectly:
“John McCain tried to point out how people should be informed about Barack Obama’s background, including his relationships with domestic terrorists like William Ayers. People are going to form these judgments. It’s great fodder for us to debate every day. I think it’s fun,”
Fun!
I’m sure there will again be skeptics calling me on my lies so here’s a link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8G6dDVjW6c :54 seconds in.
Yes, the Rush quotes were real. Does context really matter when the the topic is the so-called merits of slavery? How about praising the assassin of an American icon and Civil Rights leader? Is there *any* context in which this would be appropriate?
Is this type of dialogue good for America? Is this really who we are?
October 21, 2008 at 5:24 PM #291250ParticipantThe bottom line is that the “Obama’s Shady Past” narrative was created out of the need to distract voters and candidates from discussing the real issues… Hillary tried it and failed – and now McCain has made it the centerpiece of his campaign.
In fact, McCain’s campaign manager, Rick Davis explained it all perfectly:
“John McCain tried to point out how people should be informed about Barack Obama’s background, including his relationships with domestic terrorists like William Ayers. People are going to form these judgments. It’s great fodder for us to debate every day. I think it’s fun,”
Fun!
I’m sure there will again be skeptics calling me on my lies so here’s a link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8G6dDVjW6c :54 seconds in.
Yes, the Rush quotes were real. Does context really matter when the the topic is the so-called merits of slavery? How about praising the assassin of an American icon and Civil Rights leader? Is there *any* context in which this would be appropriate?
Is this type of dialogue good for America? Is this really who we are?
October 21, 2008 at 5:24 PM #291252ParticipantThe bottom line is that the “Obama’s Shady Past” narrative was created out of the need to distract voters and candidates from discussing the real issues… Hillary tried it and failed – and now McCain has made it the centerpiece of his campaign.
In fact, McCain’s campaign manager, Rick Davis explained it all perfectly:
“John McCain tried to point out how people should be informed about Barack Obama’s background, including his relationships with domestic terrorists like William Ayers. People are going to form these judgments. It’s great fodder for us to debate every day. I think it’s fun,”
Fun!
I’m sure there will again be skeptics calling me on my lies so here’s a link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8G6dDVjW6c :54 seconds in.
Yes, the Rush quotes were real. Does context really matter when the the topic is the so-called merits of slavery? How about praising the assassin of an American icon and Civil Rights leader? Is there *any* context in which this would be appropriate?
Is this type of dialogue good for America? Is this really who we are?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.