- This topic has 175 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 1 month ago by
felix.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 21, 2008 at 12:42 AM #290927October 21, 2008 at 8:43 AM #290614
urbanrealtor
ParticipantEnorah has a point in her criticism.
Literally I think Boyle is accurate but the implication that he is a black muslim and a terrorist all kind of wrap up together.
The part I find compelling here is that regardless of which of these is being imputed here, neither is acceptable.
It is not reasonable to say that he is unqualified either because of his religion or because of his race.
Likewise, the assertion that he is a terrorist sympathizer or a terrorist himself requires some evidence to have any validity. Ted Kennedy, as a Roman Catholic Irish-American is about as likely to be a terrorist based on these superficial criteria.
October 21, 2008 at 8:43 AM #290926urbanrealtor
ParticipantEnorah has a point in her criticism.
Literally I think Boyle is accurate but the implication that he is a black muslim and a terrorist all kind of wrap up together.
The part I find compelling here is that regardless of which of these is being imputed here, neither is acceptable.
It is not reasonable to say that he is unqualified either because of his religion or because of his race.
Likewise, the assertion that he is a terrorist sympathizer or a terrorist himself requires some evidence to have any validity. Ted Kennedy, as a Roman Catholic Irish-American is about as likely to be a terrorist based on these superficial criteria.
October 21, 2008 at 8:43 AM #290929urbanrealtor
ParticipantEnorah has a point in her criticism.
Literally I think Boyle is accurate but the implication that he is a black muslim and a terrorist all kind of wrap up together.
The part I find compelling here is that regardless of which of these is being imputed here, neither is acceptable.
It is not reasonable to say that he is unqualified either because of his religion or because of his race.
Likewise, the assertion that he is a terrorist sympathizer or a terrorist himself requires some evidence to have any validity. Ted Kennedy, as a Roman Catholic Irish-American is about as likely to be a terrorist based on these superficial criteria.
October 21, 2008 at 8:43 AM #290965urbanrealtor
ParticipantEnorah has a point in her criticism.
Literally I think Boyle is accurate but the implication that he is a black muslim and a terrorist all kind of wrap up together.
The part I find compelling here is that regardless of which of these is being imputed here, neither is acceptable.
It is not reasonable to say that he is unqualified either because of his religion or because of his race.
Likewise, the assertion that he is a terrorist sympathizer or a terrorist himself requires some evidence to have any validity. Ted Kennedy, as a Roman Catholic Irish-American is about as likely to be a terrorist based on these superficial criteria.
October 21, 2008 at 8:43 AM #290967urbanrealtor
ParticipantEnorah has a point in her criticism.
Literally I think Boyle is accurate but the implication that he is a black muslim and a terrorist all kind of wrap up together.
The part I find compelling here is that regardless of which of these is being imputed here, neither is acceptable.
It is not reasonable to say that he is unqualified either because of his religion or because of his race.
Likewise, the assertion that he is a terrorist sympathizer or a terrorist himself requires some evidence to have any validity. Ted Kennedy, as a Roman Catholic Irish-American is about as likely to be a terrorist based on these superficial criteria.
October 21, 2008 at 9:26 AM #290659peterb
ParticipantEventhough Powell quit, he still took the job and did what he was told for a long time. Ruined his street cred.
October 21, 2008 at 9:26 AM #290971peterb
ParticipantEventhough Powell quit, he still took the job and did what he was told for a long time. Ruined his street cred.
October 21, 2008 at 9:26 AM #290974peterb
ParticipantEventhough Powell quit, he still took the job and did what he was told for a long time. Ruined his street cred.
October 21, 2008 at 9:26 AM #291010peterb
ParticipantEventhough Powell quit, he still took the job and did what he was told for a long time. Ruined his street cred.
October 21, 2008 at 9:26 AM #291012peterb
ParticipantEventhough Powell quit, he still took the job and did what he was told for a long time. Ruined his street cred.
October 21, 2008 at 9:53 AM #290680urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=peterb]Eventhough Powell quit, he still took the job and did what he was told for a long time. Ruined his street cred. [/quote]
How valid is that criticism when applied to a soldier?
Mind you I don’t necessarily disagree but the purpose of the military is to follow orders and enact policy of the civilian leaders, not to think critically or create policy themselves.
He was a part of the civilian leadership at the time you mention but that was not his background.October 21, 2008 at 9:53 AM #290991urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=peterb]Eventhough Powell quit, he still took the job and did what he was told for a long time. Ruined his street cred. [/quote]
How valid is that criticism when applied to a soldier?
Mind you I don’t necessarily disagree but the purpose of the military is to follow orders and enact policy of the civilian leaders, not to think critically or create policy themselves.
He was a part of the civilian leadership at the time you mention but that was not his background.October 21, 2008 at 9:53 AM #290994urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=peterb]Eventhough Powell quit, he still took the job and did what he was told for a long time. Ruined his street cred. [/quote]
How valid is that criticism when applied to a soldier?
Mind you I don’t necessarily disagree but the purpose of the military is to follow orders and enact policy of the civilian leaders, not to think critically or create policy themselves.
He was a part of the civilian leadership at the time you mention but that was not his background.October 21, 2008 at 9:53 AM #291030urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=peterb]Eventhough Powell quit, he still took the job and did what he was told for a long time. Ruined his street cred. [/quote]
How valid is that criticism when applied to a soldier?
Mind you I don’t necessarily disagree but the purpose of the military is to follow orders and enact policy of the civilian leaders, not to think critically or create policy themselves.
He was a part of the civilian leadership at the time you mention but that was not his background. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
