- This topic has 175 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by felix.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 20, 2008 at 11:33 PM #290892October 21, 2008 at 12:04 AM #290546nostradamusParticipant
I spent some time reading about Bill Ayers.
Guess how many people he killed?
noneWouldn’t a terrorist be held in a maximum security prison or be executed for treason?
no, he is a distinguished professor at U of IllinoisThen why is he labeled a terrorist?
He was a 1960’s anti-war activist and co-founder of the Weather UndergroundDid the Weather Underground kill anyone?
Maybe they killed 1 police sergeant but it is not clear. They did blow up some statues at public buildings, blew up a statue at the “riot police” parade and bombed a wall at the Pentagon. While making bombs they also blew up 3 of their own members by accident. All of their bomb attacks were aimed at property, not people.Here is your terrorist in person.
October 21, 2008 at 12:04 AM #290856nostradamusParticipantI spent some time reading about Bill Ayers.
Guess how many people he killed?
noneWouldn’t a terrorist be held in a maximum security prison or be executed for treason?
no, he is a distinguished professor at U of IllinoisThen why is he labeled a terrorist?
He was a 1960’s anti-war activist and co-founder of the Weather UndergroundDid the Weather Underground kill anyone?
Maybe they killed 1 police sergeant but it is not clear. They did blow up some statues at public buildings, blew up a statue at the “riot police” parade and bombed a wall at the Pentagon. While making bombs they also blew up 3 of their own members by accident. All of their bomb attacks were aimed at property, not people.Here is your terrorist in person.
October 21, 2008 at 12:04 AM #290859nostradamusParticipantI spent some time reading about Bill Ayers.
Guess how many people he killed?
noneWouldn’t a terrorist be held in a maximum security prison or be executed for treason?
no, he is a distinguished professor at U of IllinoisThen why is he labeled a terrorist?
He was a 1960’s anti-war activist and co-founder of the Weather UndergroundDid the Weather Underground kill anyone?
Maybe they killed 1 police sergeant but it is not clear. They did blow up some statues at public buildings, blew up a statue at the “riot police” parade and bombed a wall at the Pentagon. While making bombs they also blew up 3 of their own members by accident. All of their bomb attacks were aimed at property, not people.Here is your terrorist in person.
October 21, 2008 at 12:04 AM #290895nostradamusParticipantI spent some time reading about Bill Ayers.
Guess how many people he killed?
noneWouldn’t a terrorist be held in a maximum security prison or be executed for treason?
no, he is a distinguished professor at U of IllinoisThen why is he labeled a terrorist?
He was a 1960’s anti-war activist and co-founder of the Weather UndergroundDid the Weather Underground kill anyone?
Maybe they killed 1 police sergeant but it is not clear. They did blow up some statues at public buildings, blew up a statue at the “riot police” parade and bombed a wall at the Pentagon. While making bombs they also blew up 3 of their own members by accident. All of their bomb attacks were aimed at property, not people.Here is your terrorist in person.
October 21, 2008 at 12:04 AM #290897nostradamusParticipantI spent some time reading about Bill Ayers.
Guess how many people he killed?
noneWouldn’t a terrorist be held in a maximum security prison or be executed for treason?
no, he is a distinguished professor at U of IllinoisThen why is he labeled a terrorist?
He was a 1960’s anti-war activist and co-founder of the Weather UndergroundDid the Weather Underground kill anyone?
Maybe they killed 1 police sergeant but it is not clear. They did blow up some statues at public buildings, blew up a statue at the “riot police” parade and bombed a wall at the Pentagon. While making bombs they also blew up 3 of their own members by accident. All of their bomb attacks were aimed at property, not people.Here is your terrorist in person.
October 21, 2008 at 12:11 AM #290556sdduuuudeParticipantIf I could, I’d vote for Powell to stage a military coup and overthrow whatever socialist regime takes power in January.
October 21, 2008 at 12:11 AM #290866sdduuuudeParticipantIf I could, I’d vote for Powell to stage a military coup and overthrow whatever socialist regime takes power in January.
October 21, 2008 at 12:11 AM #290869sdduuuudeParticipantIf I could, I’d vote for Powell to stage a military coup and overthrow whatever socialist regime takes power in January.
October 21, 2008 at 12:11 AM #290905sdduuuudeParticipantIf I could, I’d vote for Powell to stage a military coup and overthrow whatever socialist regime takes power in January.
October 21, 2008 at 12:11 AM #290907sdduuuudeParticipantIf I could, I’d vote for Powell to stage a military coup and overthrow whatever socialist regime takes power in January.
October 21, 2008 at 12:42 AM #290576ArrayaParticipantBut such is the nature of republicorp-democorp politics. Stir up the people with emotional frenzy driving hot buttons and pretend there’s a difference.
The least the McCain camp could do would be to explain how many billions they plan to give to the rich banksters of the country while the economy implodes. That would make things a little more clear. But, I’m not holding my breath.
Both candidates voted pro war, so the only thing that seems at stake is the kind of socialism the one brings over the other. Socialism for bankers, or socialism for a broader market. Not much of a choice, but it’s not supposed to be…which is why the PowersThatBe write such big checks to both sides.
The only economic track the PTB have is to mix enough socialism into cannibalistic capitalism to keep it afloat and themselves at the top of the heap. Have fun.
October 21, 2008 at 12:42 AM #290886ArrayaParticipantBut such is the nature of republicorp-democorp politics. Stir up the people with emotional frenzy driving hot buttons and pretend there’s a difference.
The least the McCain camp could do would be to explain how many billions they plan to give to the rich banksters of the country while the economy implodes. That would make things a little more clear. But, I’m not holding my breath.
Both candidates voted pro war, so the only thing that seems at stake is the kind of socialism the one brings over the other. Socialism for bankers, or socialism for a broader market. Not much of a choice, but it’s not supposed to be…which is why the PowersThatBe write such big checks to both sides.
The only economic track the PTB have is to mix enough socialism into cannibalistic capitalism to keep it afloat and themselves at the top of the heap. Have fun.
October 21, 2008 at 12:42 AM #290889ArrayaParticipantBut such is the nature of republicorp-democorp politics. Stir up the people with emotional frenzy driving hot buttons and pretend there’s a difference.
The least the McCain camp could do would be to explain how many billions they plan to give to the rich banksters of the country while the economy implodes. That would make things a little more clear. But, I’m not holding my breath.
Both candidates voted pro war, so the only thing that seems at stake is the kind of socialism the one brings over the other. Socialism for bankers, or socialism for a broader market. Not much of a choice, but it’s not supposed to be…which is why the PowersThatBe write such big checks to both sides.
The only economic track the PTB have is to mix enough socialism into cannibalistic capitalism to keep it afloat and themselves at the top of the heap. Have fun.
October 21, 2008 at 12:42 AM #290925ArrayaParticipantBut such is the nature of republicorp-democorp politics. Stir up the people with emotional frenzy driving hot buttons and pretend there’s a difference.
The least the McCain camp could do would be to explain how many billions they plan to give to the rich banksters of the country while the economy implodes. That would make things a little more clear. But, I’m not holding my breath.
Both candidates voted pro war, so the only thing that seems at stake is the kind of socialism the one brings over the other. Socialism for bankers, or socialism for a broader market. Not much of a choice, but it’s not supposed to be…which is why the PowersThatBe write such big checks to both sides.
The only economic track the PTB have is to mix enough socialism into cannibalistic capitalism to keep it afloat and themselves at the top of the heap. Have fun.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.