Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Clinton, Republicans agree to deregulation of US financial system
- This topic has 140 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by ltokuda.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 20, 2008 at 8:23 PM #273608September 20, 2008 at 10:39 PM #273320WickedheartParticipant
[quote=patientlywaiting]Ex-SD, so if the Gramm bill was so bad, why didn’t Bush undo it like his has undone many of Clinton’s other doings?
It seems to me like Phil Gramm had more to do with it than Bill Clinton.
[/quote]
Of yeah. He wasn’t content with the repeal of Glass-Steagal. You can thank him for the lack of oversight of Wallstreet, the Enron mess and the Commodities Futures Moderization Act.
Foreclosure Phil
Phil Gramm as Treasury Secretary if McCain wins, what a great idea!
Phil Gramm calls us “a nation of whiners”
September 20, 2008 at 10:39 PM #273566WickedheartParticipant[quote=patientlywaiting]Ex-SD, so if the Gramm bill was so bad, why didn’t Bush undo it like his has undone many of Clinton’s other doings?
It seems to me like Phil Gramm had more to do with it than Bill Clinton.
[/quote]
Of yeah. He wasn’t content with the repeal of Glass-Steagal. You can thank him for the lack of oversight of Wallstreet, the Enron mess and the Commodities Futures Moderization Act.
Foreclosure Phil
Phil Gramm as Treasury Secretary if McCain wins, what a great idea!
Phil Gramm calls us “a nation of whiners”
September 20, 2008 at 10:39 PM #273572WickedheartParticipant[quote=patientlywaiting]Ex-SD, so if the Gramm bill was so bad, why didn’t Bush undo it like his has undone many of Clinton’s other doings?
It seems to me like Phil Gramm had more to do with it than Bill Clinton.
[/quote]
Of yeah. He wasn’t content with the repeal of Glass-Steagal. You can thank him for the lack of oversight of Wallstreet, the Enron mess and the Commodities Futures Moderization Act.
Foreclosure Phil
Phil Gramm as Treasury Secretary if McCain wins, what a great idea!
Phil Gramm calls us “a nation of whiners”
September 20, 2008 at 10:39 PM #273614WickedheartParticipant[quote=patientlywaiting]Ex-SD, so if the Gramm bill was so bad, why didn’t Bush undo it like his has undone many of Clinton’s other doings?
It seems to me like Phil Gramm had more to do with it than Bill Clinton.
[/quote]
Of yeah. He wasn’t content with the repeal of Glass-Steagal. You can thank him for the lack of oversight of Wallstreet, the Enron mess and the Commodities Futures Moderization Act.
Foreclosure Phil
Phil Gramm as Treasury Secretary if McCain wins, what a great idea!
Phil Gramm calls us “a nation of whiners”
September 20, 2008 at 10:39 PM #273638WickedheartParticipant[quote=patientlywaiting]Ex-SD, so if the Gramm bill was so bad, why didn’t Bush undo it like his has undone many of Clinton’s other doings?
It seems to me like Phil Gramm had more to do with it than Bill Clinton.
[/quote]
Of yeah. He wasn’t content with the repeal of Glass-Steagal. You can thank him for the lack of oversight of Wallstreet, the Enron mess and the Commodities Futures Moderization Act.
Foreclosure Phil
Phil Gramm as Treasury Secretary if McCain wins, what a great idea!
Phil Gramm calls us “a nation of whiners”
September 22, 2008 at 2:03 PM #273898AnonymousGuestyou posted the vote that didn’t make it.
The bills were introduced in the Senate by Phil Gramm (R-TX) and in the House of Representatives by James Leach (R-IA). The bills were passed by a 54-44 vote along party lines with Republican support in the Senate and by a 343-86 vote in the House of Representatives. Nov 4, 1999: After passing both the Senate and House the bill was moved to a conference committee to work out the differences between the Senate and House versions. Democrats agreed to support the bill only after Republicans agreed to strengthen provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act and address certain privacy concerns. The final bipartisan bill resolving the differences was passed in the Senate 90-8-1 and in the House: 362-57-15. Without forcing a veto vote, this bipartisan, veto proof legislation was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on November 12, 1999.September 22, 2008 at 2:03 PM #274146AnonymousGuestyou posted the vote that didn’t make it.
The bills were introduced in the Senate by Phil Gramm (R-TX) and in the House of Representatives by James Leach (R-IA). The bills were passed by a 54-44 vote along party lines with Republican support in the Senate and by a 343-86 vote in the House of Representatives. Nov 4, 1999: After passing both the Senate and House the bill was moved to a conference committee to work out the differences between the Senate and House versions. Democrats agreed to support the bill only after Republicans agreed to strengthen provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act and address certain privacy concerns. The final bipartisan bill resolving the differences was passed in the Senate 90-8-1 and in the House: 362-57-15. Without forcing a veto vote, this bipartisan, veto proof legislation was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on November 12, 1999.September 22, 2008 at 2:03 PM #274151AnonymousGuestyou posted the vote that didn’t make it.
The bills were introduced in the Senate by Phil Gramm (R-TX) and in the House of Representatives by James Leach (R-IA). The bills were passed by a 54-44 vote along party lines with Republican support in the Senate and by a 343-86 vote in the House of Representatives. Nov 4, 1999: After passing both the Senate and House the bill was moved to a conference committee to work out the differences between the Senate and House versions. Democrats agreed to support the bill only after Republicans agreed to strengthen provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act and address certain privacy concerns. The final bipartisan bill resolving the differences was passed in the Senate 90-8-1 and in the House: 362-57-15. Without forcing a veto vote, this bipartisan, veto proof legislation was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on November 12, 1999.September 22, 2008 at 2:03 PM #274195AnonymousGuestyou posted the vote that didn’t make it.
The bills were introduced in the Senate by Phil Gramm (R-TX) and in the House of Representatives by James Leach (R-IA). The bills were passed by a 54-44 vote along party lines with Republican support in the Senate and by a 343-86 vote in the House of Representatives. Nov 4, 1999: After passing both the Senate and House the bill was moved to a conference committee to work out the differences between the Senate and House versions. Democrats agreed to support the bill only after Republicans agreed to strengthen provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act and address certain privacy concerns. The final bipartisan bill resolving the differences was passed in the Senate 90-8-1 and in the House: 362-57-15. Without forcing a veto vote, this bipartisan, veto proof legislation was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on November 12, 1999.September 22, 2008 at 2:03 PM #274218AnonymousGuestyou posted the vote that didn’t make it.
The bills were introduced in the Senate by Phil Gramm (R-TX) and in the House of Representatives by James Leach (R-IA). The bills were passed by a 54-44 vote along party lines with Republican support in the Senate and by a 343-86 vote in the House of Representatives. Nov 4, 1999: After passing both the Senate and House the bill was moved to a conference committee to work out the differences between the Senate and House versions. Democrats agreed to support the bill only after Republicans agreed to strengthen provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act and address certain privacy concerns. The final bipartisan bill resolving the differences was passed in the Senate 90-8-1 and in the House: 362-57-15. Without forcing a veto vote, this bipartisan, veto proof legislation was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on November 12, 1999.September 22, 2008 at 3:35 PM #273963ltokudaParticipantSo basically, the facts are that this whole thread is a red herring and the Glass-Steagall act has nothing to do with the current mess we’re in. It seems like another pathetic attempt to pass the blame.
September 22, 2008 at 3:35 PM #274212ltokudaParticipantSo basically, the facts are that this whole thread is a red herring and the Glass-Steagall act has nothing to do with the current mess we’re in. It seems like another pathetic attempt to pass the blame.
September 22, 2008 at 3:35 PM #274216ltokudaParticipantSo basically, the facts are that this whole thread is a red herring and the Glass-Steagall act has nothing to do with the current mess we’re in. It seems like another pathetic attempt to pass the blame.
September 22, 2008 at 3:35 PM #274260ltokudaParticipantSo basically, the facts are that this whole thread is a red herring and the Glass-Steagall act has nothing to do with the current mess we’re in. It seems like another pathetic attempt to pass the blame.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.