Why would she endorse someone who is too “inexperienced” for the job? Does she hate this country like Michelle does or what? If Obama picks an insider for VP running mate, and they don’t come more insider than a Kennedy, Edwards or Clinton, is he still the candidate of “Change”? Maybe he can find a liberal in the Bush family?That would be different at least.
Why would she endorse someone who is too “inexperienced” for the job? Does she hate this country like Michelle does or what? If Obama picks an insider for VP running mate, and they don’t come more insider than a Kennedy, Edwards or Clinton, is he still the candidate of “Change”? Maybe he can find a liberal in the Bush family?That would be different at least.
Why would she endorse someone who is too “inexperienced” for the job? Does she hate this country like Michelle does or what? If Obama picks an insider for VP running mate, and they don’t come more insider than a Kennedy, Edwards or Clinton, is he still the candidate of “Change”? Maybe he can find a liberal in the Bush family?That would be different at least.
Why would she endorse someone who is too “inexperienced” for the job? Does she hate this country like Michelle does or what? If Obama picks an insider for VP running mate, and they don’t come more insider than a Kennedy, Edwards or Clinton, is he still the candidate of “Change”? Maybe he can find a liberal in the Bush family?That would be different at least.
Why would she endorse someone who is too “inexperienced” for the job? Does she hate this country like Michelle does or what? If Obama picks an insider for VP running mate, and they don’t come more insider than a Kennedy, Edwards or Clinton, is he still the candidate of “Change”? Maybe he can find a liberal in the Bush family?That would be different at least.
Marion is not the party of tolerance. Assigning the opinions of each follower of any party to the whole party is exactly the kind of misdirection that starts to turn these debates into meaningless shouting. Must we do that?
Marion is not the party of tolerance. Assigning the opinions of each follower of any party to the whole party is exactly the kind of misdirection that starts to turn these debates into meaningless shouting. Must we do that?
Marion is not the party of tolerance. Assigning the opinions of each follower of any party to the whole party is exactly the kind of misdirection that starts to turn these debates into meaningless shouting. Must we do that?
Marion is not the party of tolerance. Assigning the opinions of each follower of any party to the whole party is exactly the kind of misdirection that starts to turn these debates into meaningless shouting. Must we do that?
