Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Civics lesson
- This topic has 90 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by hugo.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 23, 2009 at 11:43 AM #371995March 23, 2009 at 11:53 AM #372213jpinpbParticipant
SDR – Don’t let them see that movie Zeitgeist. That might be a rude awakening for them.
March 23, 2009 at 11:53 AM #372172jpinpbParticipantSDR – Don’t let them see that movie Zeitgeist. That might be a rude awakening for them.
March 23, 2009 at 11:53 AM #372327jpinpbParticipantSDR – Don’t let them see that movie Zeitgeist. That might be a rude awakening for them.
March 23, 2009 at 11:53 AM #371712jpinpbParticipantSDR – Don’t let them see that movie Zeitgeist. That might be a rude awakening for them.
March 23, 2009 at 11:53 AM #371999jpinpbParticipantSDR – Don’t let them see that movie Zeitgeist. That might be a rude awakening for them.
March 23, 2009 at 12:09 PM #372228SDEngineerParticipantI have no doubt this is an urban legend.
One clue is that the professor presumably would have known the difference between socialism and communism. The example used in this class was strict communism.
Under most forms of socialism, there is still incentive to get ahead, and people are not treated exactly equally. A doctor, for example, still commands a premium wage over a ditchdigger. The difference is simply that the wage inequality which occurs under capitalism is kept somewhat in check (especially under most hybrid systems, which appear to be the most successful, which fuse elements of both capitalism and socialism together), and a minimum living standard (usually pretty low) is guaranteed to it’s citizens.
Does anyone here really think that, for example, a CEO actually should be paid 200-300x the average salary of his workers (which is roughly the current average)? Or a trust fund kiddy who’s dad made it big, but who has never actually done anything productive themselves make – simply based on capital investment alone – hundreds of thousands of dollars a year?
March 23, 2009 at 12:09 PM #372342SDEngineerParticipantI have no doubt this is an urban legend.
One clue is that the professor presumably would have known the difference between socialism and communism. The example used in this class was strict communism.
Under most forms of socialism, there is still incentive to get ahead, and people are not treated exactly equally. A doctor, for example, still commands a premium wage over a ditchdigger. The difference is simply that the wage inequality which occurs under capitalism is kept somewhat in check (especially under most hybrid systems, which appear to be the most successful, which fuse elements of both capitalism and socialism together), and a minimum living standard (usually pretty low) is guaranteed to it’s citizens.
Does anyone here really think that, for example, a CEO actually should be paid 200-300x the average salary of his workers (which is roughly the current average)? Or a trust fund kiddy who’s dad made it big, but who has never actually done anything productive themselves make – simply based on capital investment alone – hundreds of thousands of dollars a year?
March 23, 2009 at 12:09 PM #372187SDEngineerParticipantI have no doubt this is an urban legend.
One clue is that the professor presumably would have known the difference between socialism and communism. The example used in this class was strict communism.
Under most forms of socialism, there is still incentive to get ahead, and people are not treated exactly equally. A doctor, for example, still commands a premium wage over a ditchdigger. The difference is simply that the wage inequality which occurs under capitalism is kept somewhat in check (especially under most hybrid systems, which appear to be the most successful, which fuse elements of both capitalism and socialism together), and a minimum living standard (usually pretty low) is guaranteed to it’s citizens.
Does anyone here really think that, for example, a CEO actually should be paid 200-300x the average salary of his workers (which is roughly the current average)? Or a trust fund kiddy who’s dad made it big, but who has never actually done anything productive themselves make – simply based on capital investment alone – hundreds of thousands of dollars a year?
March 23, 2009 at 12:09 PM #371727SDEngineerParticipantI have no doubt this is an urban legend.
One clue is that the professor presumably would have known the difference between socialism and communism. The example used in this class was strict communism.
Under most forms of socialism, there is still incentive to get ahead, and people are not treated exactly equally. A doctor, for example, still commands a premium wage over a ditchdigger. The difference is simply that the wage inequality which occurs under capitalism is kept somewhat in check (especially under most hybrid systems, which appear to be the most successful, which fuse elements of both capitalism and socialism together), and a minimum living standard (usually pretty low) is guaranteed to it’s citizens.
Does anyone here really think that, for example, a CEO actually should be paid 200-300x the average salary of his workers (which is roughly the current average)? Or a trust fund kiddy who’s dad made it big, but who has never actually done anything productive themselves make – simply based on capital investment alone – hundreds of thousands of dollars a year?
March 23, 2009 at 12:09 PM #372014SDEngineerParticipantI have no doubt this is an urban legend.
One clue is that the professor presumably would have known the difference between socialism and communism. The example used in this class was strict communism.
Under most forms of socialism, there is still incentive to get ahead, and people are not treated exactly equally. A doctor, for example, still commands a premium wage over a ditchdigger. The difference is simply that the wage inequality which occurs under capitalism is kept somewhat in check (especially under most hybrid systems, which appear to be the most successful, which fuse elements of both capitalism and socialism together), and a minimum living standard (usually pretty low) is guaranteed to it’s citizens.
Does anyone here really think that, for example, a CEO actually should be paid 200-300x the average salary of his workers (which is roughly the current average)? Or a trust fund kiddy who’s dad made it big, but who has never actually done anything productive themselves make – simply based on capital investment alone – hundreds of thousands of dollars a year?
March 23, 2009 at 12:19 PM #372357anParticipantThere are probably different implementation of socialism too. I know many people from Sweden and over there, you’d get pay equivalent doing manual labor work as being an engineer. Since school is also free over there, many people chose to do manual labor work instead since it require less education and you get paid the similar.
March 23, 2009 at 12:19 PM #372243anParticipantThere are probably different implementation of socialism too. I know many people from Sweden and over there, you’d get pay equivalent doing manual labor work as being an engineer. Since school is also free over there, many people chose to do manual labor work instead since it require less education and you get paid the similar.
March 23, 2009 at 12:19 PM #372029anParticipantThere are probably different implementation of socialism too. I know many people from Sweden and over there, you’d get pay equivalent doing manual labor work as being an engineer. Since school is also free over there, many people chose to do manual labor work instead since it require less education and you get paid the similar.
March 23, 2009 at 12:19 PM #372201anParticipantThere are probably different implementation of socialism too. I know many people from Sweden and over there, you’d get pay equivalent doing manual labor work as being an engineer. Since school is also free over there, many people chose to do manual labor work instead since it require less education and you get paid the similar.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.